Preview

What Caused The Civil War Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
813 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Caused The Civil War Essay
The Civil War was one of the most vital points in American History. The Civil War encompassed battle was a civil war fought from 1861 to 1865 to determine the survival of the Union or independence for the Confederacy. Through this moment in history lied, the fate, of the future, of the United States government. This war, although possessed many factors, events, and triggers, was truly caused for three major reasons.
Arguably the biggest and most important reason why the Civil War was caused, was because of Slavery. Slavery in the south was not just a means for economic gain, but a lifestyle. Slaves were actual property who could be bought, sold, traded or inherited. Through the large majority of plantations in the South and an agrarian economy, slaves were heavily
…show more content…
The Southern Economy didn't just rely on slavery, it was slavery. Slavery wasn't just necessary, it was also was also desired by most southern plantation owners who exploited slaves. The economic beneFits reaped from slavery is what made it so favorable. Because of this, the southern states who were accustomed to this lifestyle, were obviously against reform. Due to the norths dependence on Industrial business, they weren't at loss by the abolishment of slavery. Financially without slaves, the South would’ve most likely be nearing bankruptcy. The Missouri Comprise exempliFied just how important slaveries monetary beneFits were. The Missouri Compromise was an event in which Congress diffused the conFlict between Union and Confederate of whether the state of Missouri should be allowed to own slaves. The North saw Missouri becoming apart of the Southern partially as an uneven beneFit of a economic power. The more states that owned slaves, the more trade and production for the South would increase. The Missouri Compromise allowed Congress to allow Missouri while in turn turning the state of Maine into a slave free

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was created in 1820 to put an end to the conflict between the slave and non-slave states, however, it only caused the conflict to worsen. The dispute began to get worse and worse, eventually making the sectionalism between the North and South increase. The Missouri Compromise ignited sectionalism within the United States, which further contributed to a terrible War.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major exports of the south is cotton, and while the north invested in factories and railroads, they invested in slaves to tend to their crops. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 stated that all territories about the 36’30 line must enter as free states, and all territories below must enter as slave. They also enter as pairs, one free/one slave, to keep balance. Many inventions, such as the Cotton Gin, led to an increased need for slaves. All the while, the North was moving away from slavery for both moral and economic reasons. Popular Sovereignty allowed citizens of each new territory to vote and decide if their area would be slave or free.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The intent of the Missouri Compromise was to solve the problem of unequal representation between slave and free states in the Union and, hopefully, bring peace between the North and South.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    While there had already been tension building between the North and the South, the addition of new territory added new fuel to the fire. If the new states that emerged from the Louisiana Territory were all free, then the balance of power in the U.S. Senate would tilt decisively against slavery or vice versa . From the moment that the expansion of the United States emerged, there was conflict. Eventually after many years of debate the Missouri Compromise came to be in 1820. The Missouri Compromise was devised by Henry Clay . It was an attempt to defuse the tension causes by the addition of the Louisiana Purchase. It gave the pre-slavers the decisive state they needed to hold their position in congress. After much debate was had about which states would be free or slave states with the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, a compromise was worked out. To appease both sides Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and Maine (which used to be apart Massachusetts) would have the status of a free state, and minus Missouri, slavery was to be excluded at a certain latitude . With the Missouri Compromise; all states south of Missouri would be slave states and all states north of it would be free. The addition of Missouri as a slave state just ignited the already hot debate about the legitimacy of slavery. While the Louisiana Purchase would eventually help to…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was a good plan in theory. It made one state a slave state and another state free. It alternated between the two to keep it even. The Missouri Compromise made Missouri a slave state, and made Maine a free state. Eventually, they split slave states and free states along the 36-30 parallel, which divided the states into North and South. The North became free states and the South became the slave states. The Missouri Compromise helped keep things neat and even but split the states.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri compromise determine which states will remain free or slave states. In addition, with incoming states a lateral line 36°30 will determine whether the state will become a “free…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 between the pro-slavery and anti-slavery state representatives. The compromise involved the regulation of slavery in the western territories. It prohibited slavery north of the parallel 36°30′ north except within the boundaries of the proposed state boundaries of the Missouri territory. In return for Missouri being a freed state, Maine was allowed to become a state separate from Massachusetts. The Events that led up to the compromise are not nearly as important as what the compromise represented; a deep rooted division of doctrine.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Missouri Compromise, in many ways made political conditions worse between the North and South. For a long time the North and South had been fighting about political issues such as slavery. The North believed that it was wrong to capture, enslave and ship Africans to America to work in harsh conditions for free for White owners. The South, on the other hand believed slavery was right and should be used for helping the economy and producing cash crops so the North could use the supplies to make products. But the addition of new states, especially an uneven number made the tension grow between the two sides on the decision of slavery.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1820, the United States Congress passed the Missouri Compromise. Before it was passed the Northern states and Southern states had different ideas of the states. The North wanted to limit slavery, while the Southern states wanted more slavery. Missouri wanted to become a slave state in 1820, but the Northern states wouldn’t allow it. As a compromise, Missouri could be a slave state as long as Maine was added as its own free state, thus the Missouri Compromise. Along with these factors a rule of 36⁰30N was applied saying that in the Louisiana Territory, the states above the latitude line 36⁰ and 30 minutes North was admitted as a free state; the states below the same line were slave states. Historians say that the Missouri Compromise caused a national crisis, others question why both sides agreed to the compromise. Both Northern and Southern states both agreed to the Missouri Compromise in thought of their own benefits, but it cause a major national crisis instead.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several things that play into why the Civil War started, although the overall burning issue was slavery. Many people argue that the Civil War started over states rights. But when you look at it the states rights were to abolish or protect slavery. This problem seemed to arise as the north became more industrialized and the south stayed predominately agricultural based. As the north began to look towards a city life people began to work together as one.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Slave owners living in Missouri did not want people to Kansas and Nebraska to become free states and if the Missouri Compromise stayed than both states would become free states, because they are both above the longitude line that decides if a state is a slave owning state or not. If both states became free states than Missouri might have been forced to change from slave owning state to free but the people from Missouri in government did not allow the development…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If asked, most people would blame as the cause of the civil war the issue of slavery. This is understandable; many people in the U.S. at the time were against slavery, going to far as to help runaway slaves escape to the free north. But, while slavery at face value was a major factor, international politics and economics played a major role. Several factors, including the election of Lincoln, the raid on Harper 's Ferry, the Dred Scott decision, and, most importantly, the fugitive slave law, contributed to the growing rift between the North and South and, eventually, the Civil War.…

    • 888 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North and the South were very different economically. The South had little industry; it was based off of an agrarian economy (Doc B). Slaves picked cotton off the plantation and the farmers sold these bales to make money (Doc A). The Southerners wouldn't be able to keep their wealth without slaves working for free. If slavery was abolished, then the farmers would have to pay their slaves to do this back-breaking work, which will cause the farmers to go broke. This is why slavery was so vital in the South. Now, the North didn't care much about slavery because it didn't affect them greatly. The economy of the North was based off of industry, unlike the South. Both the Northerners and the Southerners relied on each other economically. The North depended on the South for cotton and tobacco (Doc D), and the South depended on the North for industrial materials, such as utility, the making of railroads and canals, etc. (Doc C).…

    • 676 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Causes

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    More than likely, when someone thinks about causes of the American Civil War they automatically think slavery. Slavery in America began in the early 17th Century. The majority of slaves came from Africa against their will and were forced to work on plantations under horrible conditions. This went on for a very long time, and as the demand for cotton and tobacco grew slavery in the South became the foundation of…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States was divided on slavery and the Norther States abolished slavery while the southern states embraced it. The northern states above the Missouri Compromise of 1820 did not allow slavery. The United States economy played an important role in slavery were it either strengthened or weakened it. The northern states did not have a strong agricultural business due to the type of hard and rocky soil that proved…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays