Preview

What Are the Social Causes of Youth Crime?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3303 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are the Social Causes of Youth Crime?
Youth crime has always been a concern in societies around the world. People try to determine the causes to which these problems stem from. This topic intrigued me, so I decided to write an essay on the question relating to this topic, "What are the social causes of youth crime?" The theory that I am going to examine and use to answer this question is the labeling theory. This theory is also known as the societal reaction theory. The labeling theory will often examine the offender in the situation. This theory not only examines the offender, but also the victim and the situation as a whole, instead of breaking it down. This theory claims that a "deviant" is only what the society around him/her describes him as. It also goes on to explain that the reason that many individuals become deviant is because they either grew up in a deviant social surrounding or they are unable to negotiate the rigors of everyday life.
The process of making the criminal is a process of tagging, defining identifying, segregating, describing, emphasizing, making conscious and self-conscious; it becomes a way of stimulating, suggesting, emphasizing, and evoking the very traits that are complained of. [Tannenbaum (1928: 19-20)]
The first, often called labeling or societal reaction theory, begins with a rejection of the idea that people become committed to deviant or criminal roles because they are unable to negotiate the rigors of everyday life or because they grow up in deviant social surroundings. [Cullen (1983: 123-124)] This theory known as labeling or societal reaction theory was formed as a significant paradigm in the 1960s and 1970s. Other deviant theorists tend to focus on the deviant and their behavior, while the labeling theory alters from that and moves on to look at the people who label the deviants and their behaviors. Within this perspective, there are four issues that theorists look at (Cullen and Cullen 1978a, b): origin of the "deviant label" or categories of



Bibliography: Boydell, Craig L., Carl F. Grindstaff and Paul C. Whitehead, Editors. (1972). Deviant Behaviour and Societal Reaction Cullen, Francis T. (1984). Rethinking Crime and Deviance Theory: The Emergence of a Structuring Tradition .Totowa, N.J Hawkins, Richard and Gary Tiedeman. (1975). The Creation of Deviance Interpersonal and Organizational Determinants Goode, Erich. (1978). Deviant Behavior: An Interactionist Approach. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice-Hall. Gove, Walter R., editor. (1980). The Labelling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective. Beverly Hills, Calif Lamb, Sharon. (1996). The Trouble With Blame: Victims, Perpetrators, and Responsibility. Robins, Lee N. (1966). Deviant Children Grown Up: A Sociological and Psychiatric Study of Sociopathic Personality Saragin, Edward (1975). Deviants and Deviance: An Introduction to the Study of Disvalued People and Behavior Schur, Edwin M. (1980). The Politics Of Deviance. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Scott, Robert A. and Jack D. Douglas, Editors. (1972). Theoretical Perspectives on Deviance.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Eth 125 Final Exam

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A sociological approach introduced by Howard Becker that attempts to explain why certain people are viewed as deviants and others engaging in the same behavior are not refers to…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sims, B. (1997, February). Crime, Punishment and the American Dream. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(5), 5-24.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For my study on deviance, I will consult the fictional motion picture "Instinct". Using Labeling Theory as my central perspective, I plan to identify just what is defined as deviant about the film 's main character, Dr. Ethan Powell (played by Anthony Hopkins), as well as how the individual 's society controls and perpetuates this perceived deviance. Finally, I plan to discuss the overtly presented cause of deviance in Dr. Powell 's unique case, which is ultimately unearthed by his psychologist, Dr. Theo Caulder (Cuba Gooding).…

    • 1298 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Interactionists argue that a mistake most perspectives make is that they assume lawbreakers are somehow different from law-abiding people. The labelling theory suggests that most people commit deviant and criminal acts but only come are caught and stigmatised for it. It is for this reason that emphasis should be on understanding the reaction and definition of deviance rather than the causes of the initial act.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ExaminingtheoryDownload

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Social process theories view deviant and criminal behaviors as evolving mechanisms learned through societal interaction. Social development theories view deviant and criminal behaviors as part of a maturational process. The process involves numerous perspectives—including biological, psychological, and social—…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Labelling Theory

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The criminal career is composed of re-offenses due to lack of social integration, exclusion from mainstream structures and in some cases renegation of the societal norms. The deviant is theorized to perceive no other choice but further deviance because the label attached to their discovery turns them into untrustworthy or even dangerous individuals. The social response only creates a backlash that manifests as acceptance of the label, retreatment from society or…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three main influences that explain why a person will turn to crime. These are cognitive, biological and upbringing. One influence that might cause an individual to turn to crime is upbringing. Farrington (2006) conducted a study in delinquent development to document the start, duration and end of offending behaviour from children and to adulthood in families. Farrington’s study concluded that offenders tend to be deviant in many areas of their lives. One of the most important risk factors for criminality in the family was poor school performance. This statement can be backed up by Farrington’s results that showed that, those who started criminal careers aged 10-13 were nearly all reconvicted (91%) and committed on average 6 crimes. Ages 10-16 (the early offenders) accounted for 77% of all crime in the group. This concluded that early intervention programmes for the under tens could have significant impact in reducing offending.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lilly's Labeling Theory

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thus, when discussing labeling theory, it can be assumed that society is the most responsible for the deviant behaviors of its citizens for various reasons. The first, and presumably most significant, is the fact that powerful citizens are in charge of determining which behaviors are considered criminal and which ones are not. For example, wife battering was only criminalized when individuals were motivated to create legal reform, it was not always a crime (Lilly, 2015). Society is also responsible for such behaviors because they construct the labels that lead citizens to make negative assumptions about offenders that are often times untrue (Lilley et al., 2015). As a result, these assumptions influence people’s reactions to offenders, making room for stereotyping and stigmas that produce unequal treatment for all offenders (Lilly, 2015). For example, a murder takes places in our community. While the murder itself is considered a socially deviant act, weather or not it will be viewed as a homicide depends upon the reaction of others, rather than the act itself (Lilly, 2015). If the victim was a police officer, people are going to react differently than if the victim was a…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A sociological approach introduced by Howard Beckner that attempts to explain why certain people are viewed as deviants and others engaging in the same behavior are not.” (Schaefer, 2012, p.18)…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labeling Theory

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ++A theory that involves deviance that can help reduce crime rate is the Labeling Theory. Aaron Cicourel, in his 1976 study, illustrates the labeling theory by investigating the relationship between the Californian police officers and the people whom they were more likely to arrest. Cicourel found that the police were more likely to arrest a group of people that fit the criteria of poor education, poor social status, and minority members. The police would interact with this group of people, that were suited to this list, more harshly than middle-class offenders, who were warned and then let go. The unequal treatment of the people within the society show how the view of specific acts affects their place, however, realists argue that interactionists…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Therory

    • 2288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The way individuals learn to interact with society as children tends to predict how they will interact with society and respond to its environments as adults. There are social theories that help the understanding of why individuals choose deviant behaviors and how they progress through life. Social process theories view criminal and deviant criminal behaviors as evolving mechanisms learned through societal interaction. Social development theories view deviant and criminal behaviors as part of a maturation process. Social theories are conclusions that have come about based on the response of individuals to their environments, what they have been taught, what they have learned through their experiences, and how they react to those experiences in society. Social process theories views criminality as s function of people’s interactions with various groups and institutions in society. A person’s behavior is greatly influenced by the positive and negative reinforcements of their behavior. This influence can be referred to as the differential reinforcement theory.…

    • 2288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Labeling Theory

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Conflict and radical theories ascribe several categories of crime and criminal laws to the self-interest of powerful segments of society. In common with labeling theory, the amount of objective evidence available to document these social process theories is limited and inconsistent. In the ideal and harmonious family, parents refrain from affixing labels to their children, either good or bad. It is understood that, taken to an extreme, such verbal reinforcers can easily become "self fulfilling prophecies." Supporters of labeling theory believe that a person with a deviant self-image will then suffer from reduced conventional opportunities. Over time, legal processing is felt to "steer" the individual farther and farther down the road to increased lawlessness. Future criminal offenses become statistically more likely, according to some. The risk of possible discrimination in the application of labels and legal sanctions is felt to be balanced/affirmed if the potential for continued criminality by the individual can be prophylactically curtailed. The label may reduce the overall number of victims.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Critical perspectives on crime differ from other perspectives in that they focus on ways people and institutions respond to crime and criminals. Critical perspectives are often called social reaction theories. The different theories covered under critical perspectives include Labeling theory, Conflict and radical theory and feminist theory. Labeling theory states that deviance is not the act itself that a person commits; a deviant label will lead us to be more deviant. Labeling theory is one of the most significant perspectives in the study of criminology. Amongst these theories is the labeling theory which is one of the most significant theories studied. Labeling theory adopts a relativist’s definition, by assuming that nothing about a…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays