Preview

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Under God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
907 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Pros And Cons Of Under God
Under God

Michael Newdow believes that “The government of the U.S should show equal respect for all of our lawful religious views”. Many American people are starting to argue about “under god” being in the Pledge of the United States Of America. It is becoming a problem. And its violating amendment 1 from freedom of religion. This problem needs to be solved.

Pledge allegiance history

The pledge was made in august 1892. It was written by francis Bellamy(‘The Pledge”).Francis was a baptist minister that was from New York(Jeffrey).It was originally made by the Knights Of Columbus. The Knights Of Columbus were a large catholic fraternal service organization. The pledge was first part of the celebration for Columbus Day.There
…show more content…
The pledge was mostly said in school mornings. Before class started they would start saying the pledge. When you say the Pledge you have to stand & look at the flag. You place your right hand on your heart and look straight to the flag then you start reciting the pledge(“pledge of”).

Pros

People who are for “under god” in the pledge support it for many reasons. Ronald Reagan said,” If we ever forget that we are one nation under god, then we will be a nation gone under. If we take “under god” away our nation heritage will go away too.(US pledge). Because our founding fathers were people of god(“the words”). A lot of american people say if you change it, it is going to feel wrong because they have gotten use to it.

The pledge is voluntary so people that feel uncomfortable don't have to say it. 85 percent of americans want the “under god” to stay in the pledge(god can). Also “under god” is not talking about our religious position(“why i”). Because the pledge is an expression to the flag of the US(“god can”). And kids shouldn't think they have to say it. That's why in 1943 supreme court ruled that school children could not be
…show more content…
Everybody needs equal rights( “US pledge”). The american human association wants people to sit out till the pledge is removed(why i). “Under god” is a statement of religious belief and violates the separation between church and state(“US pledge”). It's no use for it to be in the pledge because it was just to divide the US from communist countries(Anderson). Lawsuit has been sent to New Jersey and other places(“god can”). God is not a name to be used by the government for political reasons.

Conclusion

After many of these arguments whether “under god” should stay in the pledge or not. We should remove it. Because it's unfair to others with different beliefs. Like us as a nation we should understand why many people are mad about this topic. Because they came to America for freedom of religion, like amendment one says.they came to this country so they could believe in anything they wanted any other religion that isn't christianity , but our pledge is telling them otherwise.

Our government needs to know this is wrong that they our discriminating many others living in this country. Yes, it would be difficult children and adults to learn a new pledge without those words. People should know why this is wrong. We all need to be equal in this nation. We are a nation, but a nation with different raises and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I found this interesting because I have two students in my classroom that do not say the pledge. The first boy is Muslim and it is against his religion. I am not sure why the second boy does not say the pledge, but they both stand when the rest of the class says it and they are very respectful.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gwen Wilde, says “In my view, the addition of the words “under God” is inappropriate and they are needlessly divisive –an odd addition indeed to a Nation that is said to be “indivisible.” I agree with the author and believe that the words “under God” can cause hostility or disagreement between fellow Americans. I believe the pledge should be revised. I know that when I recite the pledge I do exactly what I am saying and feel proud to say it. I believe in God, so really I have never had a problem saying the entire pledge of allegiance. I do remember though, when I was in grade school a boy in my class did not recite the pledge of allegiance because of his religion. As Gwen said, “In short, the pledge which ought to unite us all, is indeed divisive.” Therefore, by revising the pledge of allegiance and omitting the words “under God,” many patriotic Americans, new citizens, and school children will be able to pledge allegiance to our flag aloud and proud instead of having to remain silent.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Society changes daily, even to a point in which the Constitution’s relevance is currently questioned. Although the Pledge is important to the majority of Americans, it should not be required in consideration of others. The American students who do choose to say the morning pledge should be respected by those who do not. Teachers should enforce no talking or distractions during the Pledge of Allegiance.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Church vs. State

    • 2756 Words
    • 12 Pages

    One of the most controversial points that is being debated in America today is the argument of church vs. state. Some people strongly believe that “In God We Trust” should be removed from the dollar bill, and “One nation under God” should be removed from the pledge of allegiance, because they feel that that is like forcing a certain faith upon people in a free country. Others strongly believe that we should keep those sayings on the money and in the pledge because it’s sticking to what America’s founding fathers believed and wanted. It is evident that this topic is hotly debated, but it is not yet evident which side is right.…

    • 2756 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While I agree with you that there are plenty of other issues going on in the world that needs to be addressed; however, I do think that this is one of those issues. I believe that this is a problem because it still stands for a country that no longer represents what those words have to say. Keeping those words in the Pledge of Allegiance only further promotes reasons for people to point out those that are different. I'm not religious at all and I have never been. I was forced as a child to go to church and I was forced to recite the Pledge of Allegiance every day at school. It always made me feel uncomfortable to say under God because I never felt that it represented me and what I thought our country stood for. We can't keep saying…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some think that it was part of something far and unknown. No, actually it is and forever will be a big part in American history. Trying to remove it now is thoughtless, we shouldn't have to relearn to whole pledge because of some small percentage of who either don't believe in God or don't believe in "forcing" students to say it. Removing the words "under God" from the pledge, is going to hurt our belief in traditions. In the same article it says, " 'Most Americans have recited the pledge hundreds of times and are not inclined to memorize a different pledge', he says. 'Changing it may just feel wrong. Most Americans they believe in God or a higher being and feel comfortable having "under God" in the pledge.' " In other words barley anyone wants to learn a different pledge and the current one makes sense to the majority. Furthermore, our nation was built up on religious principles, shouldn't it stay that way? Why should we change it? Also, in an article called "Trump: 'Under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance Is 'a Great Thing' it says, " 'Because that's what we are and that is what we will always be, and that is what our people want', he said." Trump says that we thought of ourselves as living under God, and we think the same way…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christian Nation Response

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first amendment clearly estates that introduction of new religions are acceptable and there’s no uphold to the citizens in which they have to be Christians. The amendment undoubtedly mentions the root of the United States as “We the people” and not declaring any religious believes or ideas. In the entire Constitution, there’s not mentioning of even once the name of God, Jesus or any particular deities. The treaty of Tripoli it’s an evidence that many didn’t acknowledge it yet, this treaty was made by George Washington. This treaty lucidly estates that Unites States it is not a Christian…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In fact, it was never originally part of the pledge. During the 1950’s once Eisenhower included “under god” into the pledge, he claimed, “ In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country's most powerful resource in peace and war,” (Greene). His original intent was to separate America from communism. The communists' regime ended almost thirty years ago. Communism is no longer an issue that the U. S needs to worry about so the inclusion of “under god” has fulfilled its duty. The phrase no longer holds any social significance and should be put to…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What I learn is that it is unconstitutional to stand for the pledge. Therefore, I agree with that statement. One time, in school there was a student who did not wanted to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. So the teacher forced him to stand. That means it is not mandatory.…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prayer in Public Schools

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some group of people, such as the Scientologist and Atheists do not believe in a God that governs over us. Also any other religions that have varied views governing prayer may not agree to the “ritual” of prayer in schools. To be non-offensive to all types of religions, it is best to allow prayer as an individual activity.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This mindset ostracizes those who choose to opt out of saying it. Recently, a Colorado teacher of Angevine Middle School assaulted a student who refused to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance (Wootson). While this is just one instance, many school officials react violently to students who wish to opt out. While some are merely unaware that students have the right to sit out the Pledge, others are aware of the law but make it a point to bully students into participation anyway (Niose). Additionally, when used in an exercise designed to teach patriotism to children, the words “under God” send the message that true patriots believe in God. “While a God-believer can proudly say the Pledge of Allegiance, [a] [nonbeliever] must choose to: 1) absent [themselves] from the practice 2) participate in the exercise that denigrates [their] beliefs, or 3) say a different pledge by omitting ‘under God’ which exposes the student and makes [them] appear unpatriotic” (Miller). No one would seriously contend that the daily recitation of “one nation for atheists” is not discriminatory simply because it is optional, yet “under God” is deemed as…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first reason some people claim the words should be removed is because of their belief that the words violet the constitution. The constitution says in the first amendment that you have the freedom of religion. If the U.S. tries to establish an official religion then it would violate the constitution.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pledge of Allegiance was written to fit any person in any country but the in 1945 the U.S. adopted it and changed it twice to fit our country but it wasn’t used in the morning to start the day for fifty-five years. In 2004 a student named Michael Newdow argued that “under God” challenged the right to freedom of religion and violated the prohibition on the establishment of religion in the First Amendment of the United States…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some recent legal activity has focused on allegations that public schools are proselytizing students by reciting the pledge each day (McCarthy, Martha). These legal actions were taken because some recent court cases has found that people were going against the prospect of saying “under God” in the pledge, they claim that saluting the flag contradicted their declared fidelity to God alone, a spiritual commitment that the First Amendment's "free exercise" clause protects (Sifton, Elisabeth). But by a ruling in 1943, students are also allowed to not partake in the reciting of the pledge, so there really is no reason for the separation of church and state in that field. Also, taking away the pledge would throw America into a political war. The pledge has been around for a very long time, taking it away would be like prohibiting the singing of the national anthem. The pledge is a huge patriotic symbol for most…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The five key educational issues related to the first amendment and the first one is separation of church and state. This amendment states that no laws endorsing a religion shall be passed and this impacts education because the pledge of allegiance is said in many schools and God’s in the pledge. Some people argued about public schools being funded by the government and the use of God in public schools is illegal. Under God to some people is a religious reference and it imposes on religion. This is a religious reference that goes against the first amendment that explicitly states that is prohibited to make a law establishing religion.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics