Preview

What Are The Four Alternative Remedies For The Exclusionary Rule

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
803 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Four Alternative Remedies For The Exclusionary Rule
Criminal Procedure
Michele Lira
CJA/364
November 18, 2013
Christopher Bragg

1
Exclusionary Rule Evaluation The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to exclude evidence obtained in violation of a criminal defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. It is also a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by the Fourth Amendment. Some exceptions of the exclusionary rule is barring the use at trial of evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful search and seizure. Some other exceptions to the exclusionary rule are: (1) a second, unpoisoned/untainted source had a major rule in finding the evidence, (2) the evidence would have been discovered …show more content…
They are: civil suits seeking damages, civil suits seeking injunctive relief, civil suits seeking declaratory judgment, and the possibility of criminal prosecution. The civil seeking money damages cannot provide for the appellate-court deterrence because of the doctrine of the quality immunity. Qualified immunity shields officers from liability for searches conducted in reasonable reliance. The civil suits for money damaging does not provide the necessary mechanism to correct constitutional errors.

Civil suits seeking injunctive relief also cannot provide the needed mechanism because of the Article III’s limits on Fourth Amendment injunctions. Civil law suits seeking declaratory judgment faces similar limitations. For example, for a plaintiff to have standing to seek a declaratory judgment in the Fourth Amendment case, the plaintiff needs to show that the challenged conduct is ongoing. Criminal prosecutions cannot provide a way to correct erroneous procedures. They also cannot substitute for the exclusionary rule in providing a means to correct erroneous constitutional
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    People Vs. Shaughnessy: Case Study
    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People Vs. Shaughnessy: Case Study

    Procedural History: At the conclusion of the trial, the defendant chose to move to dismiss on the grounds that the statute is unconstitutional, however, the courts found it unnecessary to pass due to constitutionality of the Ordinance because there is another reason it should be dismissed. The legal elements required to determine criminal accountability must be examined to determine if this case was handled correctly.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case: US V. Calandra 1974
    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court Case: US V. Calandra 1974

    In the case US v. Calandra (1974), Calandra was being questioned by the federal grand jury about loan sharking business. The reason the jury was asking these question were based on the evidence obtained at his company. Calandra didn’t want to answer any questions because he felt that the search of the company was an unlawful search and that it violated his fourth amendment exclusionary rule. The refusal to answer the grand jury, was what was being question about this case. Calandra felt like because of the exclusionary rule unde0r the fourth amendment he didn’t have to answer but he was wrong. The supreme court held that the exclusionary rule was only applicable in criminal courts and was not meant to be seen as a right but as a way to reduce unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by police ("Oyez: US v. Calandra," n.d.).…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dollree Mapp Case Study
    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dollree Mapp Case Study

    The court stated that the exclusionary rule also applies to states, meaning that states cannot use evidence gained by illegal means to convict someone. Clark argued that the Fourth Amendment strictly implies that the use of evidence obtained in violation of the amendment is unconstitutional. Furthermore this overturned the Wolf ruling, the Supreme Court had found that the Fourth Amendment’s protection against “police incursion into privacy” is incorporate if the right to privacy is incorporated. He also went on explaining the courts rationale based on the connection between the Fourth and the Fourteenth amendment when saying that since the Fourth amendment is a right of privacy and has been declared enforceable through the Fourteenth then it is enforceable against them by the same sanction of exclusion. The court believed that if the right to privacy stated in the Fourth amendment is valid with regard to action by the states they so should be exclusionary…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study
    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    Justice Black also believes the command that no unreasonable searches or seizures be allowed is too little to infer such a large decision. With these differences aside Justice Black feels that along with previous court decisions that the "Fourth Amendment's ban against unreasonable searches and seizures is considered together with the Fifth Amendment's ban against compelled self-incrimination, a constitutional basis emerges which not only justifies, but actually requires the exclusionary…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule: A Case Study
    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule: A Case Study

    The exclusionary rule prohibits illegally obtained evidence from being used in a criminal trial (Hall, 2015). Furthermore, the exclusionary rule applies to prevent unconstitutionally obtained evidentiary submissions, and the rule is applicable to items or confessions (Hall, 2015). After reviewing the exclusionary rule I feel it should be applied to illegal arrests too, unless the police obtain sufficient evidence independent of the illegal arrest. In the case of State v. Eserjose police made an illegal arrest of the defendant for second-degree burglary; however, during an interview the Mr. Eserjose was read his Miranda rights, and he chose to waive his rights, ultimately confessing to the burglary (Ma, 2013). Subsequently, Mr. Eserjose’s…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Raspardo Vs. Walgreen Co.: Discrimination Case
    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Raspardo Vs. Walgreen Co.: Discrimination Case

    § 1983. This law states that “every person under color of statue, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of any citizen of the US or other person within jurisdiction therefore to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceedings for redess, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer 's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.” (Forsythe,…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule: Befor Weeks V. United States
    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule: Befor Weeks V. United States

    The definition of the exclusionary rule was a principle of law that illegally obtained evidence may not be admitted in court. The exclusionary rule was one of the few laws the court system had made to enforce the Forth Amendment’s unreasonable search and seizure clause. The many exceptions and alternatives to the rule caused major controversy over why the rule even stands.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Research Paper
    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule Research Paper

    I am usually one of those people that believes in the law and that believes that rules are in place for a reason. I am well aware of the Exclusionary Rule and the Poisonous Fruit Doctrine however, these are two things that I don't believe in. According to the Exclusionary Rule, any evidence obtained without a warrant or Constitutional justification needs to be excluded from any case records. (FindLaw, 2017). While the Poisonous Fruit Doctrine indicates that the court may exclude not only the evidence itself that was seized in violation of the Constitution but also any other evidence that was derived from the illegal search. (FindLaw, 2017). This doctrine allows for many criminals to be set free on a technicality. We are all well aware that…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Automobile Search Research Paper
    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Automobile Search Research Paper

    In Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248, 251, 111 S.Ct. 1801, 1803-04 (1991) the Supreme Court held that a criminal suspect's right to be free from unreasonable searches was not violated when, after he gave a police officer permission to search his car, the officer opened a dosed container found within the car. Consent to search a vehicle inherently encompasses the entire vehicle and its contents, including closed containers. Id. The scope of the search extends to any…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule: Illegal Search And Seizure
    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page

    Exclusionary Rule: Illegal Search And Seizure

    To protect the American peoples 4th Amendment right “against unreasonable searches and seizures” from law enforcement using illegally seized evidence in a criminal trial against them, the exclusionary rule was created. The U.S. Supreme Court deemed any evidence illegally obtained inadmissible in a criminal trial, and any other evidence obtained during an illegal search and seizure inadmissible as well. This is known as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule: Police Misconduct
    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule: Police Misconduct

    Exclusionary rule is a judicially created rule that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal prosecution (Sheb and Sheb 503). It became known in 1914 after a Supreme Court case Weeks vs United States. The Supreme Court ruled that the rule was rational because police cannot illegaly do searches and…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Exclusionary Rule
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Exclusionary Rule

    What the author intends to answer is what the exclusionary rule is and alternatives to the rule that potentially increase societal self-worth and positive reinforcement. This article explains to for the exclusionary rule, “it is a judge made rule of evidence, originated in 1914 by the Supreme Court in Weeks v. United States, which bars "the use of evidence secured through an illegal search and seizure.(Wilkey, 216)” What surprises the reader is finding out that the exclusionary rule is not a rule required by the constitution. It is through…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule: Case Study
    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule: Case Study

    I find that the evidence would still be valid based on the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. The good faith exception states “that If officers had a reasonable, good-faith belief that they were acting per legal authority, such as by relying on a search warrant that is later found to have been legally defective, the illegally seized evidence is admissible” (Busby, 2009). The good faith exception was established by a 6-3 U.S Supreme court decision in the United States v. Leon 468 U.S. 897 (1984). The majority opinion, as written by Bryon R. White, was that the exclusionary rule was established to deter law enforcements violations of the 4th amendment warranting against illegal search and seizure. Therefore “reliable physical evidence seized by officers reasonably relying on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate” did not violate the exclusionary rule and the evidence was to be admitted (Kaye, 2011). The good faith exception was reviewed and expanded in Arizona v. Evans 514 U.S. 1 (1995), a case that I feel directly correlates to my decision reference the admissibility of the evidence in the example given. In Arizona v. Evans an officer conducts a legal traffic stop. Upon running the driver’s license the officer discovers an outstanding warrant for arrest. Pursuant to the arrest a search was conduct and marijuana discovered. When charging Evan’s when possession the officers discovered that the warrant had been quashed. In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that this was not a violation of Evan’s 4th Amendment rights since the evidence, though obtained based on an illegal warrant, was legal based on the good faith…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Do You Agree With The Exclusionary Rule
    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Do You Agree With The Exclusionary Rule

    The exclusionary rule is for prohibiting illegal evidence in court, this can be a deciding factor in most cases. An example of this is, they can’t fake, or plant evidence.They have to have solid concrete evidence.This rule is part of the fourth amendment, which a lot of people take seriously, these are rights given to all Americans. I agree with this because, everything needs to be done in a proper manner. If the evidence leaves the chain of custody or is collected in an unlawful manner this can be a deciding factor in the case and a guilty person can be set free. Also if anyone can come up with the evidence than an innocent person may be sentenced. So it better to do things the right way first.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Analysis
    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule Analysis

    The exclusionary rule is a legal procedure in the United States, which falls under the constitution. It protects citizens of the country in making sure that law enforcement officers are operating lawfully and that they abide by all search and seizure laws. It goes so far to protect the citizens of The United States that if a law enforcement officer illegally obtains evidence it can and most likely will be thrown out of the court. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the exclusionary rule, exploring its fallacies…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More

Related Topics