Preview

What Are The Elements Of Celador's Fraud Case

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1881 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Elements Of Celador's Fraud Case
Paul Smith started Celador in 1983 as an independent television production company in the United Kingdom. Smith’s company developed and produced a variety of shows, including the game show “Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?” which aired in the U.K. in 1998. ‘Millionaire’ was an instant success.
ABC, a subsidiary of Walt Disney Company, sought to obtain the rights for the North American “Do You Want To Be A Millionaire” from Celador. ABC asked the William Morris Agency to offer a proposal for the show. Celador insisted and ABC agreed to a direct network deal and not a deal with a production company.
The two companies agreed to a 50/50 merchandising split and a 5/0/50 split on the network broadcast profits. A contract was signed and production
…show more content…
ABC never planned to keep that promise and brought in BVT, which is owned by ABC, in order to keep all the revenue within the corporation. Because of this misrepresentation, Celador received nothing from the profits of the show.
Constructive fraud: ABC misrepresented the truth regarding how theprofits from the show were to be divided in order to induce Celador to sign the contract. Celador relied on ABC’s promises, which resulted in damages to Celador.
Unfair competition under California Business and Professions Code § 17200: Celador was denied its fair share of the show’s profits because of a lack of a fair-market value network license fee. The accounting methods used by Disney’s affiliates were unfair and deceptive and cost Celador millions from the merchandising of supplemental products associated with the show.
An accounting: Plaintiff requested the Court order an accounting be done by ABC/Disney to trace all monetary transactions having to do with the show.
Copyright infringement: Lusam Music created the theme song for ‘Millionaire’ and Disney used it for one of its park attractions without obtaining permission to do

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    F. The appellants argued this substantial award created an impermissible financial interest on the board's part in the outcome of this case.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 421 Week 4

    • 636 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If there was a contract between Big Time Toymaker (BTT) and Chou it was a bilateral contract that was binding when BTT (offeror) paid Chou (offeree) $25K in exchange for limited negotiation privileges for a 90-day period. Consequently, BTT bought the rights to negotiate the distribution agreements for Chou’s board game. A bilateral contract is an agreement of two promises and two performances. The agreement stipulated that at the end of the 90-day period, there wasn’t a distribution agreement unless it was in writing. Considering that an oral contract may result in a binding contract it is my assumption that there was a contract for the 90 day negation period with the exception of the distribution.…

    • 636 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are a few facts that weigh in favor of Chou. First, three days prior to the end of the 90 day exclusive negotiation rights agreement, they reached an oral agreement and then shortly thereafter, a business email from a BTT management representative was sent to Chou with the specifics of the agreement. The email stated “that…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During a transaction, CNAC observed that Holberg had breached the contract and as a result decided to sue. CNAC and Holberg presented the contract between them to the trial court of Houston, Texas. CNAC pointed out the provision Holberg had breached, and though Holberg attempted to refute the claims, it was clear and apparent the contract had been violated. After careful review by the trial court, the judge awarded CNAC $94,304.79 as well as the additional expenditures accumulated as a result of the trial.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LAW 421 WEEK 4

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The favor goes to Chou because BTT showed a lot when they gave in the 25,000. After that the oral agreement came to be played in. And last came the final details of what else should be included all in it. There was a chance of making it a contract but like stated before without a signature nothing came about.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 421

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By studying the situation, I don't believe the 2 sides concerned ever had a deal. In the situation, the sides reached a deal just 3 days ahead of the conclusion of a 90-day time frame set in the initial negotiation deal. In the initial negotiation deal, it says that there would be no distribution agreement until it was on paper. As soon as the BTT manager posted the e-mail to Chou, he described the conditions of a distribution contract; however it doesn't make the email an agreement as neither side inked it. Just a verbal deal was reached. With no legally binding draft and the signature of both sides present, no agreement existed.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The parties had a contract when they spoke of and agreed on the deal that was later followed up by a BTT manager via email.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think the parties had a contract as soon as BTT sent over the email names Strat Deal. If it weren't in the exclusive negotiation agreement that stated the no distribution contract valid unless it's in writing, then I would say they were in a contract when Chou accepted the 25,000 from BTT for the 90-days exclusive rights.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Big Time Toy Maker

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The facts that may weigh in favor of Chow are the exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period, the oral agreement that was reached at the meeting and the email he received from Big Time Toy. The facts against Chou would be that there is never an actual written agreement drafted by Chou. In addition, the exclusive negotiation rights agreement stipulated that no distribution contract existed unless it was in writing. Finally, no written agreement was turned in within the original 90-day period stipulated in the exclusive negotiation right agreement.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Walt Disney Vs Eric Faden

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For starters, Eric’s work is in no way harming the profits of disney, he uses the videos for educational purposes and he is not gaining any money from the production. Although he used clips from the disney movies themself, he made sure to mash it up to manipulate what the characters in the film were saying into showing what he wanted it to say instead. This goes hand in hand with one of the four factors of fair use; the effect of the use on the potential market or value of the work.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Client Compliance Report

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Client also reported she won $5,000.00 from Wheel of Fortune but failed to submit any letter or document. Client wanted CM to contact Wheel of Fortune.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We all know, or at least hear about, Disney’s relationship with copyright, and how they refuse to let anyone touch their work. The character Mickey Mouse alone has lasted 87 years with a copyright over its head. Disney doesn’t want anyone to use their work under any circumstances. Although there is a brave man, who goes by the name of Mr. Faden, who used the loophole in the system in order to educate others in the most ironic way. This paper is discussing the court case of Mr. Faden’s remix “Fair(y) Use Tale” vs. Walt Disney. Mr. Faden’s remix is an educational video about the rules and laws of copyright and how it works, but the entire is told through clips of Disney movies. Walt Disney is claiming that Mr. Faden’s remix,“Fair(y) Use Tale, is copyright…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    week 2

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both BTT and Chau vocally consented to the deal. A realistic person would have expected the deal was on its way to go through because BTT paid Chau 25K for negotiation rights for a 90 day period. At this point there was an enforceable agreement between Chau and BTT.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory to practice

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Big Time Toymaker (BTT) develops, manufactures and distributes toys and board games. An inventor named Chou created a board game called Strat. Chous invention caught the attention of BTT and they sought out to negotiate with Chou. During the time of communication between both Chou and BTT an agreement was made. Both parties agreed to BTT having exclusive negotiating wrights for a 90-day period in exchange for $25,000.00. The agreement stated that no contract exist unless in writing. After a meeting when an oral agreement was made Chou was emailed a document subject Strat deal by a manager of BTT. This email can be considered the contract in writing and Chou assumed so, later to find that BTT was now run by new management who claimed they were uninterested in his invention.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First,what is the Disney corporation and how did it come to be? It was created almost single handedly by Walter Elias "Walt" Disney. He was born on December 5, 1901, one of five children. Walt had a love for drawing cartoons early on and even made money as a child by selling some of them to family and friends. When he was 16 he joined the Red Cross as an ambulance driver for WW1 after being denied service in the army for his young age. This patriotic fervor that would later shape his cartoons. When he returned home from the war he made a few failed attempts at working in different animation companies until he and his brother, Roy, started the Disney Brothers Studio in 1923 after moving to California. (Biography.com)…

    • 5396 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays