Preview

What Are The Differences Between Romeo And Juliet

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
287 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Differences Between Romeo And Juliet
The Zeffirelli and Luhrmann versions of William Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy, Romeo and Juliet, are similar in several ways. One way that they’re similar is at the beginning of Act I, scene i, Samson and Gregory are at the public place in Verona are talking. When they see the servants to the Montague’s walk by the Capulets servants, one of them bite their thumb at them. Another thing that is similar is when they draw their swords in the Zeffirelli version. In the Luhrmann version, they have guns that are known as “swords” but which are drawn in both versions of Shakespeare's play. In the Luhrmann version, the “swords” they use is a gun. On the clip of the gun, it says Montague or Capulet depending on who the servants belong to. In the Zeffirelli version of the play, the actors would use real swords in the fight scenes. To conclude, there are multiple similarities of William Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet. …show more content…
In the Luhrmann version, the Montagues and Capulets would cars instead of having to walk and ride horses. The “prince”, chief of officers, would use a helicopter and uses a megaphone to tell Tybalt and Benvolio to lower their weapons. In the Zeffirelli version, the prince would ride a horse and will have his men follow him. Another difference is that the Lord Montague was riding a limousine in the Luhrmann version. In the Zeffirelli version, Lord Montague runs to the Capulets place and wants to fight Lord Capulet. Lady Capulet was trying to hold Lord Capulet back but he didn’t let her. In conclusion, there are many differences between both versions of the play but are very

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    But it was also different in many ways. The concept was the same in all the movies as well as the play. About how two people can not be in love because of their family dispute. But no one knows why the Montague’s and Capulet's did not like each other at the time. But after Romeo and Juliet both died the Prince said that the families was both equal and that no one else should die. Both the Montague’s and Capulet's was mad and same that they both lost a child. And they did not like each anymore than they did but they also have to find a way to get over it and move on. They both lost someone cause they would have disapproved of the love that Romeo and Juliet had. The point to me behind Romeo and Juliet is brave but sad at the same time. I think that because they went behind what their parents wanted because they loved each other. They wanted to be together and they did anything to be…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the play, everything takes place in the city of Verona, Italy. However in the film, everything takes place on Verona Street, in the gardens of the Montague’s and Capulet’s houses. In both the play and the film, are two separate groups of people, the Montagues and the Capulets. They’ve had a feud for a long time and don’t even remember why. There are also many deletions in the film that were in the original play.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The original play by Shakespeare and Zeffirelli and Luhrmann’s interpretation of the play are all different versions of the classical tragic story of Romeo and Juliet. When reading the play or seeing Zeffirelli and Luhrmann’s film we can observe various differences between them. Juliet, being one of the dominating characters of this story can be seen to be recontextualised differently through her personality, looks and role in society.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann have both directed a film version of Romeo and Juliet very well, but a movie can not capture everything from the book. So, which movie portrayed the book better? There are aspects of both movies that portray the book better. For example, there could one movie could show the character's personality better than the other one or one movie can show the city of Verona better than the other movie did. Small details of a scene could make a scene in one movie a lot better than on the other. Even the smallest of things like the way the characters are dressed could impact the entire scene. In some scenes, the Baz Luhrmann movie portrayed the book better because of the small details…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One detailed part that both movies portrayed conveniently and truthfully are the characters of the original play. In the original play of The tragedy of Romeo & Juliet, Tybalt, (Juliet's cousin), is this violently aggressive jealous man with a hot-tempered attitude, which causes him to amuse certain events at the annoyance of his relatives. This can be seen at the feast, as Tybalt automatically amuses Romeo has come to dispute the party based on him being a Montague. “This, by his voice, should be a Montague...What! Dares the slave come hither covered with an antic face, To fleer and scorn at our solemnity? Now, by the stock and honor of my kin, To strike him dead I hold it not a sin,” (Act 1, Scene 5, Lines 53-58 ). This scene shows that Tybalt will take any chance he has to kill a Montague, as long as it's not a sin; thus also showing that he has such a strong sense of honor towards his family. Seeing how Tybalt is described in the original play, both directors made sure that Tybalt’s performance would be as similar to how he’s depicted in the play, to establish Tybalt as the main antagonist in their films. In Luhrmann's Romeo + Juliet, Tybalt overreacts in an almost menacing vengeful way when he hears Romeo, as he begins to bang his chest and threaten him with death for the sake of his family. In Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet, Tybalt reacted similarly to when he saw Romeo dance with Juliet at the feast, as he furiously walked afterwards towards Lord Capulet with rage and envy, telling him that he would not tolerate Romeo. Above all, both movies depicted this character truthfully and convelling as the main villain of Romeo & Juliet, by bringing the play’s details to life; thus capturing a small, but crucial part of Romeo & Juliet’s whole essence. However, while both movies were able to capture the essence of the original play’s characters,…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only is the opening scene similar in both the Zeffirelli and Luhrmann’s version because of the prince’s arrival but also because of the similarity of the use of colours to differentiate the Capulet’s from the Montague’s. For instance, in the Zeffirelli’s version of Romeo and Juliet the Montague’s and the Capulet’s are differentiated by colour (Montague’s are wearing red and yellow, Capulet’s are wearing blue and green). Similarly, in the Luhrmann’s version, the Montague’s and Capulet’s are differentiated by colour (Montague boy’s cars are yellow, Capulets boy’s cars are blue). Henceforth, this goes to show that both the Zeffirelli and Luhrmann’s version of Romeo and Juliet are similar because of the use of colours to differentiate the Capulet’s from the Montague’s. Franco Zeffirelli shows the differences between the Montague’s and Capulet’s by making the Montague’s wear yellow and red, and making the Capulet’s wear blue and green. Correspondingly, Baz Luhrmann differentiates Montague boys from the Capulet boys by making the Montague boy’s cars yellow, and Capulets boy’s cars blue. If the two families weren’t differentiated by colour than the audience would have trouble determining…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many similarities between the two Romeo and Juliet films. One way the two movies are the same is with the characters. They also have the exact same minor characters such as Sampson, Gregory, Baltazar, Paris, and Prince Escalus. Another similarity between the two movies is with the language or dialogue used in the films. The characters both used the 1400 language where Juliet says on the balcony “Tis but thy name…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann reenactments of William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet are wonderful and was and still is very famous for its use of words and the plot of the play itself. All though there are many differences between these two films there are many similarities to the reenactments. The characters from the films had many things in common the character were very funny with their acting and put emotions into their part. The plot line between the two films was very different but had many similarities, the plot was the same by the Montague and Capulet running into each other and then starting an argument leading to a conflict many moments later. The family feud is a strong and very hostile emotion between these two…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romeo and Juliet Compare

    • 501 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare’s play, “The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet”, the type of love that the two main characters share for each other plays a big part in their horrible tragedy. Although Shakespeare portrays the two youths as experiencing strong first love attraction for each other, Romeo’s passion and love prevails as the more sincere of these two star-crossed lovers. Throughout the story, Juliet falls in love with Romeo because of what she observed in his actions and words, while Romeo loves Juliet solely because of her beauty. Romeo is the one responsible for naively rushing the relationship with thoughtless haste, thus creating an untimely end.…

    • 501 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As for the mood, there a few differences between the two versions of the tragedy. In the dialogue of marriage in the play, Romeo and Juliet are serious and sedate. In Zeffirelli’s version of the play, the marriage scene makes Romeo and Juliet to look almost like fools of young love because they are constantly kissing and giggling. In a marriage, the bride and groom are to be calm and patient because it is an important step in their lives, and the play shows this kind of character. The movie does not portray this realistic kind of character. During the “funeral” ceremony for Juliet, the Friar Lawrence made a giggle because he already knew about the secret plan. This part destroyed the sad and mischievous mood of the scene. Nevertheless, I believe the play and Zeffirelli’s movie did a great job in explaining the tragedy, but the movie could have been a lot more enticing if it weren’t for those minor slip-ups. The play also could have used some help because it felt like the characters lacked some expression unlike the movie, but I cannot criticize which one was better because the play is the way it is to be. One thing that the movie and the play collaborated together, were the props and scenes.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters do have some differences, since they are created in another place and time. For example, Doc is more helpless than Friar Laurence; Det. Shrank shows the dark side (not the wiser side) of the law; the religious side of Maria and Juliet comes from a different motivation. There are also other possibilities for comparison--are the characters Anybodys and Action similar to Shakespeare's clowns in the way they comment on society? Are Rosalia, Velma and the other women Romeo's Rosalind--stereotypes of women by naive men?…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Multiple film versions have been made of the play Romeo and Juliet. Most of these versions have been suitable adaptations of the play. One that specifically stands out is the 1996 version of the film. Unlike other versions the 1996 version of Romeo and Juliet is not a sutiable adaptation of the play because of the flaws in setting and tone which didnt relate enough to the play.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A humongous difference between the play and movie is that Romeo is being chased by the police as he is making his way to Juliet’s resting place. In the play this never even happened he just got on a horse and went to the place. Lurman had to include put a chase in there, but that’s just one weird thing in this scene the other one is that Romeo takes a hostage because he gets surrounded by the police. This part was probably not expected by a lot people.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romeo and Juliet are two normal people, from two different families that are enemies, who aren’t allowed to date each other. This big conflict between two families get into a street fight, and all of a sudden the two star crossed lovers fall deeply in love. These two characters have different personalities and relationships with friends and families, but by the end, they end up both relating each other.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the opening scene of the modern adaptation of "Romeo and Juliet", the qualities of the feuding families: The Montagues and The Capulets are successfully exposed to the audience by the use of presentational devices. The director, Baz Luhrmann, has paid deliberate attention to these areas, which successfully portray the rival family member's temperaments. The use of different lighting, colour, music, sound effects, costume and make up are applied to represent the different families to show the distinction of the two. Areas such as framing, location, camera angle and movement help to express the diversity of the two families, making it apparent to the audience the existence of the two families resentment towards each other. This essay will…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays