Preview

What Are The Arguments Against Nuclear Energy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
771 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Arguments Against Nuclear Energy
Nuclear energy on the other hand is a result of heat generated through the fission process of atoms. All power plants convert heat into electricity using steam. At nuclear power plants, the heat to make the steam is created when atoms split apart - called fission. The fission releases energy in the form of heat and neutrons. The released neutrons then goes on to hit other neutrons and repeat the process, hence generating more heat. In most cases the fuel used for nuclear fission is uranium.

Most supporters of nuclear energy point out the low carbon emission aspect of nuclear energy aAlthough nuclear energy is considered clean energy its inclusion in the renewable energy list is a subject of major debate. To understand the debate we need to
…show more content…
To be counted as renewable, the energy source (fuel) should be sustainable for an indefinite period of time, according to the definition of renewable energy.

Another major argument proposed by the opponents of including nuclear energy as renewable energy is the harmful nuclear waste from nuclear power reactors. The nuclear waste is considered as a radioactive pollutant that goes against the notion of a renewable energy source.Yucca Mountain is one of the examples used quite often to prove this point. Most of the opponents in the US also point at the fact that while most renewable energy source could render the US energy independent, uranium would still keep the country energy dependent as US would still have to import
…show more content…
The recent statement by Helene Pelosi, the interim director General of IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency), saying IRENA will not support nuclear energy programs because its a long, complicated process, it produces waste and is relatively risky, proves that their decision has nothing to do with having a sustainable supply of fuel. And if that's the case then nuclear proponents would have to figure out a way to deal with the nuclear waste management issue and other political implications of nuclear power before they can ask IRENA to reconsider including nuclear energy in the renewable energy list .

References

[1] K. Johnson, "Is Nuclear Power Renewable Energy," Wall Street Journal, 21 May 09.

[2] B.L. Cohen, "Breeder Reactors: A Renewable Energy Source," Am. J. Phys. 51, 75 (1983).

[3] J. Kanter, "Is Nuclear Power Renewable," New York Times, 3 Aug

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to Professor Cohen, if the Uranium deposit could be proved to last as long as the relationship between the Earth and Sun is supposed to last (5 billion years) then nuclear energy should be included in the renewable energy portfolio. The actual amount of uranium deposit available is way more than what is considered extractable right now, once we can extract uranium from other sources such as uranium from the eroding earth crust by river water. Another major upside to nuclear energy is that the amount of carbon emissions released into the air is minuscule compared to coal or other non-renewable energy sources. Other than the fact that at the moment nuclear energy is non-renewable, the only downside is that the…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These scenarios have led to nuclear power having a very bad public reputation despite numerous statistics showing that other energy sources have been much more…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays
    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canada 10% o South Africa 10% Uranium enrichment: ore is refined to increase concentration of U-­‐235 and processed into small pellets Nuclear reactor: device that initiates and maintains controlled nuclear fission chain reaction to produce electricity Pellets that are packed into fuel rod and grouped into fuel assemblies 200 rods per assembly and 150-­‐200 assemblies per reactor Final steps of fuel cycle: o Radioactive “spent” fuel must be safely stored for thousands of years o Nuclear plants must be retired after life span (15-­‐60 years) – radioactive materials must be stored or disposed of Nuclear power today: US: 104 nuclear reactors in 31 states o Accounts for 8-­‐9% of overall energy and 19-­‐20% of all electricity • France: 59 reactors – 77% of all electricity Controversies over nuclear energy 1.) Costs: Why so expensive? o Up front costs high – so delays very expensive o Technology is complex o Decommissioning expensive o Regulatory compliance expensive • Nuclear power plants require government $$$ – would not exist without government support! • 2.)…

    • 7330 Words
    • 249 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today there are so many countries and governments that have realized that nuclear energy is the only way to significantly decrease their emissions. The world economy is producing greenhouse emissions at the…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No new nuclear power plants should be built because the increasing energy demand in the United States can be met with less negative environmental impact with power generated by renewable sources such as wind, solar, and tidal power. The “zero emissions” benefit of nuclear energy is a common misconception. The actual reaction in a nuclear power plant only creates steam and radioactive waste; it does not produce greenhouse gasses or particulate matter that the combustion of fossil fuels creates. But, due to reliance on existing fossil-fuel power for plant construction, decommissioning, and fuel processing as well as the mining, enrichment, and transport of uranium, the nuclear…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    living wastes known to man. The technology to safely dispose of this waste has yet to…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    BioChem Paper

    • 2762 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nuclear power is a highly debated resource because it is very efficient but can also be very dangerous. I for one do not like nuclear energy because it is hazardous but it is almost impossible to stay away from now. Nuclear energy produces lots of energy at a high efficiency rate. Even though I would include it into my energy policy I would also look for better alternatives. Even though we are running out of…

    • 2762 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although using renewable energy sounds like a great idea, several people argue that renewables are not green, nor are they sustainable. The only way it’s even possible for renewable energy to contribute to production is by taking up vast amounts of land which in return will cause more damage. In order to truly go green, the best solution would be to use nuclear power instead. Not only does it generate large amounts of powers, it takes up a much smaller amount of land. Personally, I agree. This will help shrink our society’s energy system and reduce costs for everyone.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Energy Exploration

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nuclear energy can be very dangerous but can also be cleaner than other energy sources by creating less pollution than fossil fuels. It is an advanced form of energy that has only been available for the past 50 years. It is very similar to fossil fuel in that it uses steam turbines to produce electricity. It uses uranium to produce heat in a process called nuclear fission where neutrons are smashed into the nucleus of atoms splitting them and releasing heat energy.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (FYI) Nuclear energy is one of many technologies used to generate electricity. It is a clean, safe, and an economic energy source that does not contribute to smog, or emit acid gases or greenhouse gases that are linked to climate change…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of nuclear energy should be allowed to continue for many reasons such as nuclear energy is cleaner and safe when handled properly. An example of where nuclear energy is cleaner than other forms of energy such as coal-burning is in how the energy or heat is produced in the plants. In nuclear power plant the energy or heat it produced by the fission of Uranium; in a coal-burning plant the burning of coal produces the energy or heat. The Uranium power plant does not produce the soot and harmful gasses, such as CO2, that the coal-burning plant does. Also, nuclear power plants are cleaner because very little fuel is needed to create a lot of energy; and there is no air pollution like there is with a coal-burning…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The emissions of greenhouse gases and therefore the contribution of nuclear power plants to global warming is therefore relatively little. Another reason is because it can be established technologies for building nuclear power plants. Another reason is nuclear fuel is not expensive and easier for transportation. The last reasons are Highly Efficient No carbon dioxide (CO2) and Cheap Energy. That’s why i’m all for nuclear power are you against it or are you all for it. There are so many reasons to be all for nuclear power but the main reason is zero emissions: Nuclear power produces 20 percent of America’s electricity and 70 percent of our carbon-free electricity today. In contrast, wind and solar power provide only 2 percent of our electricity and only 6 percent of our carbon-free electricity. Nuclear also produces none of the air pollution that comes from burning fossil fuels. Reliable: America’s nuclear reactors operate 90 percent of the time, making nuclear our most reliable source of electricity. Renewable energy is intermittent, with power available only when the wind blows or the sun shines — about a third of the time. It’s hard to imagine a strong economy that can run its computers, factories and…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays