What Are The Arguments Against Gay Marriage

A Former US senator and a senior at the Ethics and Public Policy Center begin their case against gay marriage with the point that there are no studies that prove that homosexuals have a positive impact their community. They claim that people that support homosexuals are not “seeing the big picture” or assuming the repercussions of damaging others, including children, morally, religiously, physically, and mentally. When asked about a “go-slow approach,” their rebuttal consists of the idea that once America has gone slow all the way to the conclusion, Americans will be unhappy with the results; it is not worth using the courts. They continue with the statement that what is best for the children is a couple, a heterosexual marriage. “We know it’s
We know it’s better for men. We know it’s better for women. We know it’s better for communities.” He proves that this is the best because it is known and there is nothing else that is known, therefore, the first out of one first option is the safest. If people got married in a willy-nilly fashion, the sanctity of marriage would be tarnished for those it was meant for exclusively in the first place, thus, there is damage to the community. In places allowing same-sex marriage there are more people who divorce, wait to marry, abstain from marriage, or have children with someone they are not married to, and it is bad for society and the children. America was built Christian, for Christians, and with that in mind, it is embarrassing to even discuss the possibility of same-sex marriage. However, the discrimination against those who stand against same-sex marriage is improperly placed because opposing views are not divided into the enlightened versus the bigots. Not only is it okay to fight, it is necessary because if everyone pretends to accept this, one day, it will become