Preview

What Are Desecrated Rights Of Expressions And Speech?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
280 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are Desecrated Rights Of Expressions And Speech?
Understanding that the right of expressions and speech is that of every American and that each individual is entitled to express themselves as they are compelled (with respect to those guidelines which protect safety and security of persons (text)), I tend to agree with Senator Kerry in his appreciation for the interpretation of the First Amendment as presented. Senator Kerry states "A desecrated flag is replaceable. Desecrated rights are lost forever to those who experience the loss" (Ban).
The use of the first amendment to protect some individuals’ rights, but deny the same right of expression to others calls into question the validity of such laws/statutes. As the First Amendment assures the people the freedom of speech, press, religion,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights. A careful reading of the First Amendment reveals that it protects several basic liberties freedom i.e. religion, speech, press, petition, and assembly. Interpretation of the amendment is far from easy, as court case after court case has tried to define the limits of these freedoms. The prohibition on abridgment of the freedom of speech is not absolute. Certain types of speech may be prohibited outright. Some types of speech may be more easily constrained than others. Furthermore, speech may be more easily regulated depending upon the location at which it takes place. All these rights protect the people of the US they have the right to religion and speech, they right to say whatever they want as long as it’s true without being held accountable for it. Even though speech is protected by the First Amendment not every speech is protected for example obscenity, child pornography, and speech that constitutes so-called “fighting words” or “true threats” are not protected by the amendment. There has always been controversy for defending the free speech rights of groups that spew hate, such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Nazis. But if only popular ideas were protected, we wouldn't need a First Amendment. If we do not come to the defense of the free speech rights of the most unpopular among us, even if their views are antithetical to the very freedom the First Amendment stands for, then no one's liberty will be secure. I can’t say I disagree with anything about these facts, I do agree that one should have freedom of speech everyone should feel free to express themselves by speaking but not everything should be said and that is why not every speech is protected by the amendment.…

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, the first amendment is taken advantage of in many ways. Many people express that they can say whatever they please because they have the Freedom of Speech. They might burn the USA flag, make a racist remark, or some other kind of action, but what they do not realize is that this may hurt people. The First Amendment should be limited so that individuals can speak their mind so long as it does not hurt other people, or violates their rights.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment, Freedom of Speech could probably be considered one of the most powerful amendments of the Constitution. It is very important to distinguish the suitability of Freedom of Speech and its’ position under the First Amendment. The essay “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus” presented by Derek Bok gives an example as to why this should be. In his essay Derek Bok responded to the presentation of the Confederate flag and the swastika by students at Harvard, with the expectation that the readers already have an understanding of what the phrase “freedom of speech” means to them as well as other people universally. “The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first amendment of the Bill of Rights, it clarified that all citizens of the United States have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. A democracy is a “government by the people”, if the government respects the freedom of speech, of the press, and of association, the 1st Amendment guarantees these freedom from the citizens, which is an important part of…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of expression from government interference. This is one of the most important amendments in the constitution and is what America is most proud of. However, these rights aren’t all they are cracked up to be. For example, censorship is very common and goes against the freedom of speech. Censorship has many different roles in society both in the past and present. In the past it was used as a way for dictators to control their people and keep them from reading rebellious literature. Hitler even burned all books that he did not like.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No citizen can be forced to do something that violates his or her religious views, so the First Amendment protects all those who strongly believe in any religion. No religion is considered more important than another, and no one can be discriminated against based on that religion, meaning that even private businesses can make decisions based on their religious views without punishment. The religious freedom and toleration created by the First Amendment should be considered in laws, social issues, and government actions.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Haac Pros And Cons

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Free speech, more than any other of America’s values, has been the touchstone of American democracy dating back to the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment, created in 1791, is so important because “without our basic and essential rights established by that first amendment, the others amendments would have little to no meaning and hardly any force.” It shows the creativity and innovativeness of American democracy. The Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” However, almost from the moment the…

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first amendment of the US Constitution has come into a lot of political controversy because it gives us some of the very essential rights to be whom we want to be. Under the first amendment we as United States citizens have the right to “freedom of speech, or the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble”, which some people don’t want us to have these rights and will try to come up with laws to restrain us from using them so it can benefit their cause (Ivers, 2013). I feel that the government wants to have the power to keep us in control and be able to do what they want, when they want with us.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment states - “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many individuals and groups alike that choose to express their disdain for certain actions, laws, and behaviors through the use of Freedom of Speech. The First Amendment has been cited by many protesters when demonstrating that it is their right to Freedom of expression. Freedom of Expression is powerful enough that sometimes words do not have to be spoken for a message to be conveyed. However, not all acts are protected by the First Amendment. For example, burning the flag is protected under the First Amendment but promoting the benefits of marijuana at a school event would be protected (U.S. Courts, n.d). If by chance there is a question of constitutionality regarding the First Amendment, it is usually linked to the overbreadth doctrine. Simply meaning, an individual may feel that their rights and/or others rights to Freedom of Speech may be prohibited by laws when applied under the context in which they were written. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is the most quoted case that addresses issues of the overbreadth doctrine as it pertains to the First Amendment.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are now limitations of free speech that were not put in place before because they have evolved as a problem of our society in this day and age. These limitations that "Fall outside of its protection are obscenity, child pornography, defamation, incitement to violence and true threats of violence," (Richards) "Even in those categories, there are tests that have to be met in order for the speech to be illegal. Beyond that, we are free to speak" (Richards). The Supreme Court of the United States of America fully supports and condones the First Amendment in all aspects and cases that don’t fall under any of these categories. This law is held to the highest importance because our country is run off of the human rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and without freedom to have a voice this would not exist. The limitations are set in place, but when the Founding Fathers passed this Amendment they wanted absolute freedom of speech, as they felt there should be no limits on what can be said and not said. Everyone has a voice or at least that’s how it started off. Present day issues, such as the items listed above, shouldn’t create a limitation on what can and cannot be said. That’s why we live in a free country unlike any in the world.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The First Amendment is the freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly , and petition. This may be the most revered of the Amendment's. The First Amendment protects our rights to say and write out opinions, worship how we please, assemble together peacefully, and petition our government, if we feel the need.”…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who knows the First Amendment by heart? Word for word? [Rhetorical Question] I did not and I still do not. I just know that the First Amendment gives us the right to express ourselves, at the right time and place. School should be a safe place where students, like us, can come and feel free to learn and share our opinions without any disruptions or negative comments. If such things are executed in class, it should and will call for suspension. But I am not saying that our rights are taken away when we enter school property, that is far from what I am saying. This important constitutional right that is used in our everyday lives is not absolute. The Supreme Court has gone back and forth, and back and forth [Repetition], trying to come to an agreement about what is a “reasonable” act of expression in school and how far is too far. Now, some may argue that developing such policies of limiting an individual’s ability to express themselves freely is a violation of the First Amendment [Concession][Ethos]. But when a conflict arises about which is more important, protecting the interest of the community or safeguarding the rights of that…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So if a law prohibits people from using any acts to defame or hurt the other’s right, the law is not violating the freedom of expression of people. For example, if there is a law that punishes people for slandering others, the law doesn’t violate the freedom of expression. Though it makes people cannot talk freely, it gives no restriction to people’s freedom of expression as it only punishes people who defames others’ reputation. So there is no contradiction between the law and the freedom of speech. This is because the person who is defaming the other is no longer protected by the freedom of expression, the punishment and law is then valid.…

    • 2225 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays