Topics: Leadership, Big Five personality traits, Personality psychology Pages: 24 (8153 words) Published: November 1, 2014
Trait Approach


Of interest to scholars throughout the 20th century, the trait approach was one of the first systematic attempts to study leadership. In the early 20th century, leadership traits were studied to determine what made certain people great leaders. The theories that were developed were called “great man” theories because they focused on identifying the innate qualities and characteristics possessed by great social, political, and military leaders (e.g., Catherine the Great, Mohandas Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, Abraham Lincoln, Joan of Arc, and Napoleon Bonaparte). It was believed that people were born with these traits, and that only the “great” people possessed them. During this time, research concentrated on determining the specific traits that clearly differentiated leaders from followers (Bass, 1990; Jago, 1982). In the mid-20th century, the trait approach was challenged by research that questioned the universality of leadership traits. In a major review, Stogdill (1948) suggested that no consistent set of traits differentiated leaders from nonleaders across a variety of situations. An individual with leadership traits who was a leader in one situation might not be a leader in another situation. Rather than being a quality that individuals possess, leadership was reconceptualized as a relationship between people in a social situation. Personal factors related to leadership continued to be important, but researchers contended that these factors were to be considered as relative to the requirements of the situation. The trait approach has generated much interest among researchers for its explanation of how traits influence leadership (Bryman, 1992). For example, an analysis of much of the previous trait research by Lord, DeVader, and Alliger (1986) found that personality traits were strongly


16   Leadership     Theory and Practice

associated with individuals’ perceptions of leadership. Similarly, Kirkpatrick and Locke (1991) went so far as to claim that effective leaders are actually distinct types of people in several key respects.

The trait approach has earned new interest through the current emphasis given by many researchers to visionary and charismatic leadership (see Bass, 1990; Bennis & Nanus, 1985; Nadler & Tushman, 1989; Zaccaro, 2007; Zaleznik, 1977). Charismatic leadership has catapulted to the forefront of public attention with the 2008 election of the United States’ first African-American president, Barack Obama, who is charismatic, among many other attributes. In a study to determine what distinguishes charismatic leaders from others, Jung and Sosik (2006) found that charismatic leaders consistently possess traits of self-monitoring, engagement in impression management, motivation to attain social power, and motivation to attain self-actualization. In short, the trait approach is alive and well. It began with an emphasis on identifying the qualities of great persons, shifted to include the impact of situations on leadership, and, currently, has shifted back to reemphasize the critical role of traits in effective leadership.

Although the research on traits spanned the entire 20th century, a good overview of this approach is found in two surveys completed by Stogdill (1948, 1974). In his first survey, Stogdill analyzed and synthesized more than 124 trait studies conducted between 1904 and 1947. In his second study, he analyzed another 163 studies completed between 1948 and 1970. By taking a closer look at each of these reviews, we can obtain a clearer picture of how individuals’ traits contribute to the leadership process. Stogdill’s first survey identified a group of important leadership traits that were related to how individuals in various groups became leaders. His results showed that the average individual in the leadership role is different from an average group member with regard to the following eight traits: intelligence, alertness, insight, responsibility,...

References: Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: A survey of theory
and research
Bennis, W. G., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New
York: Harper & Row.
Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London: Sage.
Caruso, D. R., & Wolfe, C. J. (2004). Emotional intelligence and leadership development. In D. V. Day, S. J. Zaccaro, & S. M. Halpin (Eds.), Leader development for transforming organizations: Growing leaders for tomorrow
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five
factor structure
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.
Jago, A. G. (1982). Leadership: Perspectives in theory and research. Management
Science, 28(3), 315–336.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and
leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review
Jung, D., & Sosik, J. J. (2006). Who are the spellbinders? Identifying personal
attributes of charismatic leaders
Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter? The
Executive, 5, 48–60.
Mann, R. D. (1959). A review of the relationship between personality and performance in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 241–270.
Marlowe, H. A. (1986). Social intelligence: Evidence for multidimensionality and
construct independence
Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2000). Selecting a measure of emotional
intelligence: The case for ability scales
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1995). Emotional intelligence and the construction
and regulation of feelings
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey
& D
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2000). Models of emotional intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 396–420).
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 52, 81–90.
Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1989). What makes for magic leadership? In
Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the
Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research.
Zaccaro, S. J. (2002). Organizational leadership and social intelligence. In
Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Trait-based perspectives of leadership. American Psychologist,
62, 6–16.
Zaccaro, S. J., Kemp, C., & Bader, P. (2004). Leader traits and attributes. In
Zaleznik, A. (1977, May–June). Managers and leaders: Are they different? Harvard
Business Review, 55, 67–78.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free