Preview

Week 5 Discussion

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
292 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Week 5 Discussion
Week 5
Discussion

Discuss the following:

A staff meeting has been called for all members of the administrative department at the hospital where you work.
Due to a change in patients’ needs, the hours of operation need to be modified. Several scheduling options are presented and a decision has to be made.

Should this decision be made by a majority vote, or a consensus?

Support your choice with reasoning from the decision making section on page 98 of your GMC.

I think that due to the time and hours of operation that it should be a majority vote for the reason or reasons outlined below:

1.Since there is only the matter of counting votes, decisions can be reached much more quickly with majority rule.

Majority rule does not require the same level of interpersonal communication. It is a democratic process which ultimately comes down to simple mathematics. This method of decision-making, outside of registration, is often anonymous. The nature of the process, in many cases, allows individuals to maintain their privacy, as others cannot know with certainty, for whom or what a person has voted.

A disadvantage of majority rule is the majority’s ability to vote against the interests and preferences of those in the minority without those groups or individuals being heard or involved in the discussion. Those in the minority may be disenfranchised and remove themselves from the decision-making process because they are aware they do not have the numbers to win or significantly impact the vote

Majority rule is a quicker decision-making process.
Majority rule is susceptible to abuse by the majority, while groups seeking to reach a consensus may fall victim to groupthink.

Majority means more than half
Majority simply means the larger part.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Framers limited majority rule to prevent minorities starting an uprising. By restraining majority rule, uprisings would not be able to form in…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individual rights are more important than the wishes of the majority. I think that the majority has a point, because this is a democracy. It is based on the majority vote. This country is not based on what a single person wants.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is a system of government in which members of the polity meet to discuss all policy decisions and then agree to abide by majority rule?…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    That said, the first premise, democratic Laws are made by the majority, does show weakness. It is true that a democracy is…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main dangers of referendums is the tyranny of the majority. This issue essentially deals with the fact that referendums work in favour of the majority and leave the minority defenceless and their say is not taken into account. In 2008 Manchester released a referendum asking whether a congestion charge should be introduced, the vote was 78.8% no in a 53.2% overall turnout. In this occasion the ‘yes’ campaigners, primarily Labour, whose plans for improving local transport where left politically stranded and their hopes for improving the city environmentally and in the transport sector were abandoned. The ‘no’ campaign were strong to emphasis the price of the congestion charge and were therefore have thought to won the vote this way. Therefore, referendums are…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So far, 11 states, including California, New York and Illinois, have said they would support this proposal” (Savage 1). Some people believe that abolishing the Electoral College is the only way to enact a majority rule election. However, this process proves that can be achieved without abolishing the Electoral College. The National Popular Vote, enables majority rule to be taken into effect without abolishing the EC, it is basically an equipollent process. If critics endeavor to call this action unconstitutional, they will be confuted by Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 of the Constitution which enables the states to dictate how they do elections.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Majoritarianism teaches that, on any issue, the majority gets to determine what the norm should be. This mentally had both political and social applications. For instance, because America is a democracy majoritarianism is often romanticized and equated with fairness. Majoritarianism is accepted as an ideal way to determine social and legal codes but there can be serious drawn backs to this. For one thing, majoritarianism can mask power dynamics while oversimplifying the intricacies of decision-making.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In other words, the votes of some are 15 times more powerful than the votes of others. Loenen makes note that the purpose (of the right to vote) cannot be less than to guarantee to citizens their full democratic rights in the government of the country and the provinces” (Loenen, 1997). He also mentions that such a fundamental right must not be diluted for some citizens by giving greater weight to the vote of others (Loenen, 1997). The court seems to be unaware that plurality electoral system regularly produces majority governments from a minority of the…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The majority does not perform the greatest ability to protect all members of a society. In the case of Miranda v Arizona, the courts had to decide whether or not a man was deprived of his freedoms while in police custody. Basically Miranda v Arizona completely changed the way police apprehend and interrogate suspects. However it was not only Miranda, but many other instances where the majority has not protected all minorities. Vignera v New York was another similar instance where a suspect was forced to sign statements and an inculpatory statement, while being questioned by police, without knowing he was entitled to legal representation. In California v Stewart, local police held and interrogated the defendant for 5 days,…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    government is NOT ruled by a majority, but instead is ruled by an already enforced set of laws…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Examples Of Sortition

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The freedom to representation guarantees that citizens will be free to have their views represented in whatever group makes decisions about national laws or budgets. Deciding who will represent the views of the people, whether it is a group or an independent leader, often creates conflict. Elected representatives are vulnerable to corruption, bribery, and bias. Sortition, or selection by lottery, protects the legitimacy of the election process and ultimately allows for a more truthful representation of the people. Examples from history and contemporary politics have proven that sortition is a practical and impartial system of voting that should be integrated into any new society and its constitution.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Proportional voting can lead to an unclear majority that correlates to the difficulty in a win for the Electoral College votes (270). Even though this could cause frustration, proportional voting could also be a positive; with proportional voting, comes coalitions. Coalitions bring candidates together in order to win elections. That, consequently, brings choice to the election, but not in an abrupt way. Combing candidates establish an easier election process which can build to a more stable government.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some proponent’s claim that could have a significant impact on influencing the voting interests groups and minorities, because they have all the systems in the state of winners (Advantages and Disadvantages of Electoral College, 2014).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    free and fair elections are important pillars of any democracy because it is necessary for peaceful transfer of power. Elections give voters an opportunity to elect representatives who serve as their leaders and shape the future of a nation or society. Since 1978 ratification of United States (U.S) constitution, U.S has been a representative democracy. U.S presidential elections are held every 4 years. States hold causes or primary elections before the general election to choose delegates to national nominating conventions.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    8. Majority Rule - Majority rule is the idea that at least one more than half of the total number of people has voted in a certain direction. Usually, majority rule is good when you are voting on something and need a quick solution to be presented.…

    • 5943 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays