Preview

Webster's War With Mexico

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
625 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Webster's War With Mexico
Webster argued that the war with Mexico and the admission of new states would be horrible. This was his own opinion, but many individuals during this time period felt the way that he did. Webster talks of what the president has his mind set on and how that mindset cannot be changed. This is viewed as a problem that Webster can not get over, he feels that the president should listen to the people and not be caught up in his own mindset. The mindset of the president was one that was given to him by many of the people of the United States, but was it the majority of the people? Webster never discusses this with his readers. This may be for certain reasons; maybe the majority did feel the need for expansion. Webster would have hurt his own argument for him to put that in this article. …show more content…
Webster adamantly disagreed saying that any new state joining the Union was a bad thing and that it would only hurt the United States. "For the sake of peace, we must take territory! This is the will of the President!" (237). Webster continued by saying "Mr. Polk will take no less! That is fixed upon! He is immovable!" (237). This clearly shows that Webster firmly believes that the President will not change his mind about the annexing of any new states. Webster tells that the people do not want to allow anymore states into the Union. "If we will take peace without new States, and the Administration will have no peace without new States, I am willing to stand upon that, and trust the people" (237). Webster then argues that "if a state proposes to come into the Union, and to come in as a slave state; then there is an augmentation of the inequality in the representation of the people"

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The end result of the Texas-Mexico War was The Republic of Texas for about 10 years Texas was an independent country.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In United States history textbooks, the chief significance of the Mexican American war was territorial and political. For $15 million, the nation added 500,000 square miles of western lands from Kansas to the Pacific, encompassing what is now California, Arizona, New Mexico, and parts of Utah and Colorado. The war also re-ignited disputes over slavery in the western territory.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stephen F. Austin’s father (Moses Austin) was the original person to pursue a settlement in Texas (which was part of Mexico). In 1821, he had been granted a significant amount of land in the territory, but died shortly after. That was when Stephen F. Austin became the one to move forward with the settlement. It originally attracted 297 US families and continued to grow. By 1830, the Mexican government was greatly concerned with the large population of US citizens moving to Texas, so they closed the border. When this happened, Austin took action to convince Mexico’s President to reopen the border, because many Texan settlers still had families in America who wanted to settle there. The President of Mexico listened to him and did as he asked.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision in which Texas should become annexed was an ongoing battle in which many people have many different beliefs. Henry Clay a famous speaker of the house believed that we should not annex Texas. One of the reasons was that he believed it would start a war with Mexico. He also believed that it would not help the Union at all. Another man John L. O'Sullivan believed that we should annex Texas. One of his main reasons is that it would add more land, power, and another state to the Union.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Zinn argued that the Mexican American war was unpopular, not supported by most Americans and the Mexican American war was fought mainly for the purposes of expansion…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ironically, the cause of the Mexican – American War was due to the politics of the U.S. President at the time, President Tyler. Tyler wanted to achieve a second term in presidency, but his name among the American people was not as well known in contrast to his opponent James K. Polk. President Tyler contemplated ways to make himself a more popular candidate, and came to a conclusion that would essentially foreshadow the coming of the war. He wanted his name to be associated with the thought of “American Expansion”, unfortunately he would never get that chance officially because he lost the election. However, in regards to his loss, he still had a desire to finish is initial plan. He went to Congress and made use of the Joint Resolution for an annexation, instead of a treaty. This will require a two-thirds majority agreement that Tyler did not have. On the last day of his term however, he would send messengers to Texas (which at the time was not a U.S. territory) for the purpose of immediate annexation. This would not sit well with the Mexican nation (Heys) .…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexican American War DBQ

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One can argue that the Mexican-American was an unprovoked and unjustifiable war of aggression and territorial aggrandizement. It could also be argued that the war was not unprovoked nor was it territorial aggrandizement. Realistically the war provoked, justifiable, and not territorial aggrandizement. This notion is exemplified through the document provided.…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was not that long ago the United States went to war with their neighboring country, Mexico. With James K. Polk being elected president of the United States in 1844, things were about to change for Mexico. A war was about to emerge that would make the United States a bigger and better country. Without the economic growth, Mexico lacked a strong Army to defeat the American Army and Navy to keep their land. Mexico would not give up their land without a fight. People believe that the United States had no right to start a war with Mexico and take a huge part of their land. With that being said, President Polk had other plans up his sleeve, a plan to take Mexican land from Texas to California.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During his two tenures as Secretary of State, Webster focused his considerable legal talents on strengthening the U.S. Government and expanding foreign trade. He did infact he represented the United states during the Webster- Ashbourne treaty agreement. He then remained the Secretary of State for two years, before resigning due to financial difficulties and a disagreement with President Tyler over the annexation of Texas, a move stridently opposed by Webster.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the 1840s, the US aspired to annex Texas and incorporate it as a state within the Union. However, gaining Texas had its consequences as it lead a war with Mexico. William Ellery Channing, an abolitionist and pacifist, saw that the policy regarding obtaining Texas would led the “nation into war” as it severed as “encroachment,” and a way “to propagate the curse of slavery.” (Doc 2) The annexation of Texas was seen invading Texas’ link to Mexico as in document one, the American Review stated the annexation “shall dissolve the slight bounds that now link the province to Mexico” (Doc 1) This served as a situation for Mexico, who had refused to recognize Texas’ independence and its takeover by the United States, although President James Polk, a strong supporter of the annexation of Texas as seen in his Inaugural Address- where he stated “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent states,” attempted to aid Mexico in coming to an understanding. Therefore, the Mexican War broke out, out of the effort for Texas to break free its bond to Mexico. Eventually, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and came to an agreement that included setting boundaries for Texas and the acquisition of new territory- California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pre-Civil War Apush

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the 1850s, the North and South could not agree on anything and were in constant disagreements. In 1850, Henry Clay created the Compromise of 1850. In the compromise, it was said that California would be admitted as a free state which created a stir in the South since it would mean that the amount of Free states and slave states would be unbalanced (Shown in Document B). The North would now have power of the Senate and superiority over the South. The country would give Texas ten million dollars if they gave up claims to Mexico. This would take away a large piece of territory for a relatively low sum. There would be abolition of slave trade in Washington D.C., but not slavery. This meant that emancipation of slavery in the nation’s capital was starting. Also, Mexico and Utah’s slave status rested on popular sovereignty which leaned toward Free State status due to the incompatibility of the plantation system with the environment. Then, there would be a Fugitive Slave Law put in to place which would compel local officials to capture and return runaway slaves along with denying them jury trials, which some congressmen were against (Document F). Daniel Webster also delivered the Seventh of March speech backing this compromise up as everyone else did not like the idea and explained why he thought it was necessary (Document A). This caused the South distress…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican-American War served as catalyst that channeled the divisions between the North and South and the division within the political parties. The war was fought over American expansion near Mexican territory, which created major tensions that resulted in full blown war in 1846. The war was very controversial because it raised sectional tensions between the different regions within the United States. Many in the North were opposed to the war because they believed it was being fought to expand slavery. Further, some viewed it as unconstitutional; one of the most famous protests was when Henry David Thoreau refused to pay taxes to show his opposition. When the war was finished, there was further division as to what the Unites States should…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The war is waged against an unoffending people, without just or adequate cause, for the purposes of conquest; with the design to extend slavery; in violation of the Constitution, against the dictates of justice, of humanity, the sentiments of age in which we live, and the precepts of the religion we profess.” The war between the United States and Mexico had a lot of conflict between each other, and their tensions evolved over time. Although the United States war against Mexico resulted in the gaining of America´s most valuable land, the war itself was unjust because of the increase in slavery, Texans had greedy actions, and President Polk provoked the war.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Polk who was president at the time pushed for us to get land from the Mexicans. When Polk sent someone to offer 25 million max to buy it they refused, so he later sent troops under Zachary Taylor to the disputed border of Texas and Mexico. The Mexicans were angered by this and fighting broke out which led Polk to declare war on Mexico. All of the fighting could have been prevented had James Polk and his need of Manifest Destiny taken over. Most Americans supported the war but some in the north thought the south was going to try and make it a slave state and didn’t want that. Many Whigs question if the Mexicans had actually hurt anyone on American soil like Polk said they did. In the end the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo confirmed the annexation…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He graduated from Dartmouth College in 1801 and became a successful lawyer in Boston. He was an extreme advocate of states' rights. Webster was elected to the United States House of Representatives in 1812. In 1813, he was elected a New Hampshire congressman. He was a leading proponent of federal action to stimulate the economy through protective tariffs, transportation improvements, and a national bank. Later in 1827, he won a seat in the United States Senate. He was a leader of the Whig Party. His group opposed President Andrew Jackson and the Democrats. He ran for the United States Presidency in 1836. In 1840 he was named Secretary of State by President William Henry Harrison. Harrison died in 1841 and John Tyler took over the presidency. Every Whig party member of the presidential cabinet but Webster resigned from their post. In 1842 he successfully established The Webster-Ashburton Treaty. This resolved a dispute between the United States and Great Britain regarding the Maine-Canada border. The Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall adopted Webster's arguments in a number of significant cases. He returned to the position of Secretary of State in 1850. He was appointed by President Millard Fillmore. Webster oversaw the enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act. He was known as the defender of the Constitution by denouncing nullification when South Carolina adopted it. He was an opponent of…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics