Zinn's inclusion of this chapter in order to describe the time period of the Mexican-American War was in order to show the true reality behind it. The fact that the United States gave Mexico no choice but to begin the war. At the same time Zinn uses this to show the negative feelings towards the war that spread throughout the United States. William Lloyd Garrison declared his wishes for the defeat of General Scott's army, in The Liberator, stating “We wish him and his troops no bodily harm, but the most utter defeat and disgrace.” At the same time Reverend Francis Wayland said that only wars of self-defense were just, and in case of unjust war, the individual was morally obliged to resist it and lend no money to the government to support it. Desertion rates in the army also grew rapidly due to the fact that the soldiers, “did not like the army, they did not like the war, and generally speaking they did not like Mexico or the Mexicans.” At the end the glory of the victory was more for the President and the generals, than the soldiers, the dead, or the wounded. In the end through the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, the Texas boundary was set at the Rio Grande, and New Mexico and California were ceded.
The Mexican-American War is an example of a compromise of the noble intentions of the American people by slavery, poverty, and war. Right from the beginning Mexico is pushed into an unnecessary war by President Polk, due to his desire for U.S expansion. Due to Polk's decision hundreds of lives were lost which were unnecessary and could have been avoided. The American Anti-Slavery Society stated that war was “waged solely for the detestable and horrible purpose of extending and perpetuating American slavery throughout the vast territory of Mexico.” After the end of the war though immense fortunes were made by speculators from the poor soldiers who were desperate for money and were forced into selling the 160 acres of land promised them for less than $50.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Chapter eight discusses the Mexican-American War. Zinn argues that while some people have represented the war as a popular cause, the truth was fairly different. He mentions that President James Polk pushed an expansionist agenda to excuse his conquest of México, and the press supported his actions by lying about the conflict and popular response to it. Zinn argues that soldiers and the public did not like the invasion of México at all. Thousands of soldiers died from disease and desertion. Zinn’s main argument is that the invasion of México was labeled as a defensive action to gain support from soldiers and the public, but it was still seen as a war by many, and the public did not gain anything significant. The public generally thought the war was useless.…
- 1451 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In chapter three of “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos,” Acuna explains the cause of the war between Mexico and North America. Eugene C. Barker states that the immediate cause of the war was “the overthrow of the nominal republic by Santa Anna and the substitution of centralized oligarchy” which allegedly would have centralized Mexican control (Acuna 39). Texas history is a mixture of selected fact and generalized myth. The expansion and capitalist development moved together. The two Mexican wars gave U.S. commerce, industry, mining, agriculture, and stock rising. The truth is that the Pacific Coast belonged to the commercial empire that the United States was already building in that ocean. In the Polk-Stockton Intrigue, Americans found it rather more difficult than other people to deal rationally with their wars. Many Anglo-American historians attempted to dismiss it simply as a “bad war”, which took place during the era of Manifest Destiny. Most studies on the war dwell on the causes and results of the war, and dealing with war strategy. The attitude of Mexicans toward Anglo-Americans was obviously influenced by the war and vice-versa. In the end, by late 1847 the war was almost at an end. Scott’s defeat of Santa Anna in a hard fought battle at Churubusco…
- 1328 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
On the other hand Americans hold on to a belief that was popular with one candidate. John O’ Sullivan focused on a concept, manifest destiny. The idea of this concept was that Americans had a God given right to take the land in the west, eventually the land between the Atlantic and Pacific ocean. In the election of 1844 James K. Polk used manifest destiny to resolve the issue that many had to make Texas a part of the United States. He would later annex Oregon a s a free state so the their would be no strange dynamic between free and slave states. Unfortunately, this solution had a…
- 594 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The mid 1800’s, Americans obviously pushed around the Mexicans. In 1821, Mexico gained its freedom from Spain. The young nation was about the same size as the United States, and the U.S. government immediately developed a lust for Mexico’s land. Arguments arose, leading to the Mexican-American war. Like most wars, it had its supporters and critics. Looking back at the evidence a couple of centuries later, the United States did not have a valid and compelling reason to declare war on Mexico because they invaded Mexico, they craved Mexico’s land, and the U.S. disrespected Mexico.…
- 535 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1846 the United States went to war with Mexico. It was a brutal time. This country has gone to war with Mexico and no one was prepared for what was going to happen next. America was not justified in going to war with Mexico for these three reasons: provoking the war, territory was not decided, and Polk ordered troops to go to Mexico. Before the war, Texas declared its independence from Mexico. After James K. Polk was elected President, he sent an envoy to Mexico City to try and buy California, and then he sent troops to Texas. The Manifest Destiny is a belief that America would eventually become all 50 states like they are today.…
- 678 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One can argue that the Mexican-American was an unprovoked and unjustifiable war of aggression and territorial aggrandizement. It could also be argued that the war was not unprovoked nor was it territorial aggrandizement. Realistically the war provoked, justifiable, and not territorial aggrandizement. This notion is exemplified through the document provided.…
- 528 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The American President, James K. Polk, wanted to resolve these and other issues peacefully, but he also wanted to acquire California for the Union. When the Mexican government rejected his emissary, John Slidell, the stage was set for war. The causus belli was the corssing of the Rio Grande by a body of Mexican troops. A skirmish broke out and several American soldiers were killed. America declared war and drove the Mexican force out of U.S. territory. A force under General Stephen Kearny took Arizona, New Mexico, and California, while General Zachary Taylor drove south into Mexico. While his campaign was a disappointment, General Winfield Scott was much more successful.…
- 2118 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Many attempts have been made to rationalize the war as just and right. Polk claimed that the United States had been provoked into war by Mexico, and that what motivated him to go to war was, "the strong desire to establish peace with Mexico on liberal and honorable terms . . ." Pulitzer prize winner Justin H. Smith claimed that Mexico was simply unable to understand or appreciate the goodwill and righteousness of her northern neighbor. These and other rational for the Mexican war are simply cover-ups for the truth. The Mexican-American War was a premeditated act of aggression on the part of the U.S. government, perpetrated upon a weak, defenseless people.…
- 409 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Mexican American War began on April 25, 1846. The war lasted two years losing many men on both sides. The Mexican war was the third major fought by the United States. In 1810, Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla triggers the beginning of Mexico’s fight for independence from Spain. Mexico gained its independence in 1821 after a long and bloody revolution against Spain. For Mexico, the war between them and the United States was a fight to keep their institutions and national integrity intact, to protect themselves from present and future aggressions by the Americans, but more than anything else, the war was a struggle for land. In the early days of the republic, most Americans made their living by farming, so in 1803 President Thomas Jefferson purchased the Louisiana Purchase Territory because he wanted to provide “room enough for out descendants to the thousandth and ten thousandth generation.” In 1803 the United States purchased land from Napoleon west of the Mississippi, also known as the Louisiana Purchase. The Unites States nearly doubled in size, extending its borders two thirds of the way from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. In 1804-1806 the Lewis and Clark expedition explores western North America. Mexico had a population of only about 2,500 living in Texas, they offered cheap land to attract Americans and build up the territory. Mexico only allowed one religion which was Catholicism and for everyone to follow the teachings of the church. The U.S government marked the route of the Santa Fe Trail so settlers in New Mexico can get goods from the U.S that they have not been able to get from Mexico. By the early 1800s many of the inhabitants of Mexico didn’t like the Spanish Rule and wanted to establish a democratic government. In 1810 there were several executions. The gachupines (those born in Spain) executed Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla who had led a large group of mestizos (the offspring of mixed marriages) who were rebels in…
- 4451 Words
- 18 Pages
Good Essays -
At this point some Americans were growing tired of gaining more land and they found that this was necessary. “That the annexation of the whole of Mexico to the United States would be fatal to this government, whoever may doubt it, we are well convinced” (Doc. F). Americans were beginning to expand even more and more trying to get a huge territory. We end up going to war with Mexicans, winning. In Document I when see a picture comparison between the Mexican Eagle before the war which was a strong and mighty eagle in contrast to the Mexican Eagle after the war, plucked to the skin. In Document G, we are presented a cartoon displaying how some anti-Manifest Destiny. In the picture President Polk threw up on Jackson being he has eaten too many “States”. Although having pride in your country is a good thing, but there is a moment where we have to say enough is…
- 955 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The war with Mexico came at a time when much of the country had strong feelings of Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny is the belief that fate had preordained the US to expand from the Atlantic to the Pacific oceans and from Canada to the Rio Grande. “the nation of many nations is destined to manifest to mankind the excellence of divine principles….it shall be a hemisphere – its roof the firmament of the star-studded heavens…” (Document 1). This ideal had strong influence and was one reason that there was so much popular support for the US expansion west. This ideal, while nationalistic, did not give Polk the right to go into Mexico and seize land which was rightfully theirs. The US vision of manifest destiny helped to win the public’s support for the Mexican war (Doc 2). Yet the public was misled by this sense of Manifest Destiny and those that did support it supported an unjust war.…
- 789 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
One reason the Mexican war was justified was because of the Manifest Destiny. (Doc A) When we’re welcoming Mexicans into the Texas territory, they’re keeping the U.S. from expanding. America needs land because of our massive population. Mexico’s government is so deprived that they can’t keep California. If Mexico can’t afford California, how will they even afford Texas? America will eventually have California, but that’s not enough for our evolution population. This evidence shows the U.S. was justified in going to war because Mexico can’t control the land they already have; America has more population than Mexico, the U.S. should have more land.…
- 584 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Mexican-American War was a war between the United States and Mexico which lasted from April 1846 to February 1848. It stemmed from the United States' annexation of Texas in 1845 and from a dispute over whether Texas ended at the Nueces River (Mexican claim) or the Rio Grande (U.S. claim). The war was the most devastating event in Mexican history, where Mexico lost the modern day areas of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado and Montana. The Mexican-American spawned out of land lust. The idea of Manifest Destiny and the promising lands of California, which were coveted by many European nations, led to a war of greed. Even Abraham Lincoln, then a young Congressman, and Ulysses S. Grant, the future Civil War victorious commander and U.S. President, believed that the invasion of Mexico was not justified.…
- 516 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One reason the US was unjustified is that Polk provoked Mexico. He was a strong believer of Manifest Destiny. He believed that it was God’s plan to kick out Mexicans and let the USA grows more. He stole Texas from Mexico (Doc.B). This evidence shows that the US was unjustified in going…
- 310 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
During the years surrounding James K. Polk's presidency, the United States of America grew economically, socially, and most noticeably geographically. In this time period, the western boundaries of the Untied States would be expanded all the way to the Pacific Ocean. Many Americans in the 19th century believed that the acquisition of this territory to the west was their right and embraced the concept of "Manifest Destiny". This concept was the belief that America should stretch from sea to shining sea and it was all but inevitable. Under the cover of "Manifest Destiny", President Polk imposed his views of an aggressive imperialistic nation. Imperialism is the practice of extending the power and dominion of a nation by direct territorial acquisitions over others, and clearly America took much of this land by force rather than peaceful negotiations with other nations. Polk acquired three huge areas of land to include: the Republic of Texas, the Oregon Territory, and the states of California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico under the Mexican Cession.…
- 1276 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays