Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

We Take Nothing by Conquest, Thank God

Good Essays
606 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
We Take Nothing by Conquest, Thank God
“We Take Nothing By Conquest, Thank God,” is a chapter in Howard Zinn's, History of the People. Zinn makes the point that the Mexican-American War was agitated by President Polk, and that the newspapers of the time falsely represented people's opinions of the war even though it was very unpopular among U.S citizens, and the army itself. In the night of his inauguration President Polk confided in his Secretary of the Navy that one of his main objectives was to acquire California. Then Polk incited the war by sending American soldiers into what was disputed territory that was controlled by the Mexicans. The American government had given Mexico no choice, but to fire the first shot and so the war was started. At the same time the Democratic Review became famous saying that it was “Our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions,” in order to inspire more people to join the volunteer army to fight in Mexico. At the same time the New York Journal of Commerce stated that, “The supreme Ruler of the universe seems to interpose, and aid the energy of man towards benefiting mankind. His interposition...seems to me to be identified with the success of our arms...That the redemption of 7,000,000 of souls from all the vices that infest the human race, is the ostensible object...appears manifest,” in order to justify the Mexican-American War in the eyes of their readers.
Zinn's inclusion of this chapter in order to describe the time period of the Mexican-American War was in order to show the true reality behind it. The fact that the United States gave Mexico no choice but to begin the war. At the same time Zinn uses this to show the negative feelings towards the war that spread throughout the United States. William Lloyd Garrison declared his wishes for the defeat of General Scott's army, in The Liberator, stating “We wish him and his troops no bodily harm, but the most utter defeat and disgrace.” At the same time Reverend Francis Wayland said that only wars of self-defense were just, and in case of unjust war, the individual was morally obliged to resist it and lend no money to the government to support it. Desertion rates in the army also grew rapidly due to the fact that the soldiers, “did not like the army, they did not like the war, and generally speaking they did not like Mexico or the Mexicans.” At the end the glory of the victory was more for the President and the generals, than the soldiers, the dead, or the wounded. In the end through the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, the Texas boundary was set at the Rio Grande, and New Mexico and California were ceded.
The Mexican-American War is an example of a compromise of the noble intentions of the American people by slavery, poverty, and war. Right from the beginning Mexico is pushed into an unnecessary war by President Polk, due to his desire for U.S expansion. Due to Polk's decision hundreds of lives were lost which were unnecessary and could have been avoided. The American Anti-Slavery Society stated that war was “waged solely for the detestable and horrible purpose of extending and perpetuating American slavery throughout the vast territory of Mexico.” After the end of the war though immense fortunes were made by speculators from the poor soldiers who were desperate for money and were forced into selling the 160 acres of land promised them for less than $50.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In chapter three of “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos,” Acuna explains the cause of the war between Mexico and North America. Eugene C. Barker states that the immediate cause of the war was “the overthrow of the nominal republic by Santa Anna and the substitution of centralized oligarchy” which allegedly would have centralized Mexican control (Acuna 39). Texas history is a mixture of selected fact and generalized myth. The expansion and capitalist development moved together. The two Mexican wars gave U.S. commerce, industry, mining, agriculture, and stock rising. The truth is that the Pacific Coast belonged to the commercial empire that the United States was already building in that ocean. In the Polk-Stockton Intrigue, Americans found it rather more difficult than other people to deal rationally with their wars. Many Anglo-American historians attempted to dismiss it simply as a “bad war”, which took place during the era of Manifest Destiny. Most studies on the war dwell on the causes and results of the war, and dealing with war strategy. The attitude of Mexicans toward Anglo-Americans was obviously influenced by the war and vice-versa. In the end, by late 1847 the war was almost at an end. Scott’s defeat of Santa Anna in a hard fought battle at Churubusco…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eisenhower, John S. D. So Far From God: The U. S. War with Mexico 1846 – 1848. New York: Random House, 1989, xxvi, 436.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Mexico justified to go to war with the United States? This essay argues the US was justified because Mexico invaded US territory, Mexician territories needed a new government, and Mexican territories didn´t respect the US reconciliation. Mexico invaded the United States terrirory. The quote that supports this is,”Mexico has passed the boundry of the United States… has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil. ”(Polk).…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American President, James K. Polk, wanted to resolve these and other issues peacefully, but he also wanted to acquire California for the Union. When the Mexican government rejected his emissary, John Slidell, the stage was set for war. The causus belli was the corssing of the Rio Grande by a body of Mexican troops. A skirmish broke out and several American soldiers were killed. America declared war and drove the Mexican force out of U.S. territory. A force under General Stephen Kearny took Arizona, New Mexico, and California, while General Zachary Taylor drove south into Mexico. While his campaign was a disappointment, General Winfield Scott was much more successful.…

    • 2118 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2) Yes, I believe Howard Zinn’s arguments, because during that time period, our soldiers didn’t really enjoy fighting, just stay in their homes and also I agree that the Mexican American war was fought for the purposes of expansion and Zinn perfectly described events that makes you see the…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexican American War DBQ

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One can argue that the Mexican-American was an unprovoked and unjustifiable war of aggression and territorial aggrandizement. It could also be argued that the war was not unprovoked nor was it territorial aggrandizement. Realistically the war provoked, justifiable, and not territorial aggrandizement. This notion is exemplified through the document provided.…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It was plainly our duty to extend our protection over her citizens and soil,” said President Polk (doc B). When troops arrived at the Rio Del Norte, Mexican troops attacked the Americans, killing and wounding sixteen soldiers. (Hook) This was the deciding factor of America going to war with Mexico. “When word arrived on May 9, 1846, that Mexicans soldiers had fired upon Americans on the “Texas side” of the Rio Grande, president Polk had a reason for going to war.” (BG essay) You see, if Mexico hadn’t engaged in violence first there would be no immediate reason for the U.S. to go to war with…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was not that long ago the United States went to war with their neighboring country, Mexico. With James K. Polk being elected president of the United States in 1844, things were about to change for Mexico. A war was about to emerge that would make the United States a bigger and better country. Without the economic growth, Mexico lacked a strong Army to defeat the American Army and Navy to keep their land. Mexico would not give up their land without a fight. People believe that the United States had no right to start a war with Mexico and take a huge part of their land. With that being said, President Polk had other plans up his sleeve, a plan to take Mexican land from Texas to California.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, Polk's accused Mexico of insults and lack of payments. The message was sent to the congress on May 11, and approved the next day. The unjust war of conquest had begun. The Mexican government understood perfectly the impossibility of…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexican War Dbq Essay

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1846 the United States went to war with Mexico. It was a brutal time. This country has gone to war with Mexico and no one was prepared for what was going to happen next. America was not justified in going to war with Mexico for these three reasons: provoking the war, territory was not decided, and Polk ordered troops to go to Mexico. Before the war, Texas declared its independence from Mexico. After James K. Polk was elected President, he sent an envoy to Mexico City to try and buy California, and then he sent troops to Texas. The Manifest Destiny is a belief that America would eventually become all 50 states like they are today.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Wicked War Analysis

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On the other hand Americans hold on to a belief that was popular with one candidate. John O’ Sullivan focused on a concept, manifest destiny. The idea of this concept was that Americans had a God given right to take the land in the west, eventually the land between the Atlantic and Pacific ocean. In the election of 1844 James K. Polk used manifest destiny to resolve the issue that many had to make Texas a part of the United States. He would later annex Oregon a s a free state so the their would be no strange dynamic between free and slave states. Unfortunately, this solution had a…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The war is waged against an unoffending people, without just or adequate cause, for the purposes of conquest; with the design to extend slavery; in violation of the Constitution, against the dictates of justice, of humanity, the sentiments of age in which we live, and the precepts of the religion we profess.” The war between the United States and Mexico had a lot of conflict between each other, and their tensions evolved over time. Although the United States war against Mexico resulted in the gaining of America´s most valuable land, the war itself was unjust because of the increase in slavery, Texans had greedy actions, and President Polk provoked the war.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mid 1800’s, Americans obviously pushed around the Mexicans. In 1821, Mexico gained its freedom from Spain. The young nation was about the same size as the United States, and the U.S. government immediately developed a lust for Mexico’s land. Arguments arose, leading to the Mexican-American war. Like most wars, it had its supporters and critics. Looking back at the evidence a couple of centuries later, the United States did not have a valid and compelling reason to declare war on Mexico because they invaded Mexico, they craved Mexico’s land, and the U.S. disrespected Mexico.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the American invasion of Mexico 25,000 people died, lives were overwhelmingly changed, and New Mexico, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, California, Texas, and western Colorado were taken away from Mexico. Half of what used to be Mexico's land is now America's most valuable land. However the process of getting it was completely inappropriate and beyond unjust. The disrespectful actions taken by American settlers once they moved to Mexico, The beliefs of manifest destiny and feeling of superiority, and pure motivation to expand slavery are all reasons that America had no right in declaring war. Nevertheless, the clash between the two countries was wrong in itself.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States was not in good reason in going to war with Mexico because James Polk provoked it. After annexing the United States, James Polk sent troops down to the disputed southern border, The Rio Grande. Mexico did not think the Rio Grande was the southern border of Texas. “In the eyes of the Mexican government the mobilization of the U.S. army was an outright attack on Mexico (Velasco-Marques, Jesus, 189).” When Polk mobilized Taylor and his troops the Mexicans were not doing anything to the United States. Polk was sending troops for no reason other to start a fight with Mexico. During the 1800s the United States started using Manifest Destiny as a reason to take land from other countries. “..our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allowed by providence (God) (O’ Sullivan, James L., 185).” When the Americans use manifest destiny it shows arrogance and superior ways to other countries. Polk and the Americans were not scared they were greedy and wanted to pick fights.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays