What is Meant by the Term ‘Watchdog” Journalism’?
Why is this Idealised Approach to Journalism Considered so Important and What are its Limitations?
The ‘journalist as investigator’ moniker arose when reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein uncovered the illegal activities in the Watergate debacle which led to President Nixon’s demise in office in the 1970s. Matheson stated recently that the Watergate chapter still has “enormous resonance around the world (as) it symbolises so successfully…the good that reporting can do, independently monitoring power and aligning itself with the interests of the people” (2010, p.82). Marder described watchdog journalism (WJ) as an “instrument of democracy” at the first Nieman Foundation Watchdog Conference in 1998, asserting that journalists be tasked to ask the hard questions at every level of public life on behalf of the populous (1999/2000). Gans confirmed that journalists still see themselves charged with exposing “corruption, malfeasance, dishonesty, hypocrisy, scandal and the violation of other mainstream rules of behaviour” (2010, p.96). WJ is important because the public are entitled to know what is really going on, why, and who is responsible – or not being responsible, as it were. Traditionally, there needed to be a facilitator between institutions and the public who lacked access.
Perplexingly, around the time of the Watchdog Conference, others were suggesting that such noble intentions were ideals, for could the news media really be expected to meet such challenges? There were attendant issues of commercial survival, questions of loyalty, and what actually constitutes the public interest (Schultz, 1998). Schultz further alleged the news media was a “flawed watchdog” because successes were random and the guardian role diminishing due to the emergence of agencies and legislation, nationally and internationally attending to societal ills. Ironically, the news media may have played a part in exposing the rot but now is more likely augmenting the bigger story via feedback from participants lower down the scale. Confounding this was a change in public attitude, exhibited in opinion polls, toward the media due to the latter’s surge for “political and economic power”, whilst avoiding “acting as a disinterested check on the abuse of such power by others” (Schultz, 1998, p.4). This decline in support of WJ was iterated not long after by the Pew Research Centre for the People and the Press, which maintained the public, had for some time, viewed news media as an “an ill-mannered watchdog that barks too often - one that is driven by its own interests rather than by a desire to protect the public interest” (Kohut, 2001, p. 52, cited in Poindexter, Heider, & McCombs, 2006).
Newspaper sales and circulation have been falling for some years despite news proprietors’ bids to overhaul paper profiles and recruit new readers (Poindexter, Heider, & McCombs, 2006). Decreasing funds meant that WJ became less of a priority for editors since it sapped resources compared to daily reporting. There are also questions as to how irregularities are pinpointed - who decides what topics reporters should pursue – and how can anybody know if journalists have been able to identify all, or enough of, pertinent issues. All these activities require commodities that are not so available in the on-going, globally depressed financial climate. It is also noticeable that news media were seduced by sensationalism and the cult of celebrity, perhaps believing this is what people wanted, however, it may have fuelled a growing lack of respect for what constituted news.
Schultz maintains that “the news media is at its most influential when it is local”’ (1998, p.7). At least one study has shown that “being a watchdog” was not a paramount expectation of readers compared with that of journalists: 49% and 70% respectively. It appeared that young and old wanted to see more “good...
References: Benesch, S. (1998). The rise of solutions journalism. Columbia Journalism Review, 36(6), 36-39.
Buchanan, S.F. (2011). Police information gathering. Retrieved from http://www.indymedia.org.nz/article/79775/police-information-gathering on 15 August 2011.
Chisholm, D. (2011, Jul-Aug). Saving Selwyn. Metro, pp.58-62.
Collins, S., & Rose, J. (2004). City Voice, an alternative to the corporate model. Pacific Journalism Review, 10(2), 32-45.
Comrie, M., & Venables, D. (2009). Public journalism Kiwi style. In A. Romano (Ed.). International journalism and democracy: Civic engagement models from around the world (pp.75-90).
Cunningham. B. (2003). Re-thinking objectivity. Columbia Journalism Review, 42(2), 24-32.
Dahlberg, L. (2005). The corporate takeover of the online public sphere: A critical examination, with reference to the New Zealand case. Pacific Journalism Review, 11(1), 90-112.
Detjen, J. (2002). A new kind of environment reporting is needed. Nieman Reports, 56(4), 38-40.
Deuze, M., Bruns, A., & Neuberger, C. (2007). Preparing for an age of participatory news. Journalism Practice, 1(3), 322-338.
Donsbach, W. (2004). Objectivity in reporting. Encyclopaedia of International Media and Communications, Vol 3, 383-391.
Du Fresne, K. (2007, 19 September). Journalism versus social activism. Manawatu Standard, Ed.1, p.10.
Dwyer, J. (2009). Communication in business: strategies and skills (4th ed.). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.
Franklin, B., Hamer, M., Kinsey, M., & Richardson, J.E. (2005). Key concepts in journalism studies. London: Sage.
Gans, H.J. (2010). News and democracy in the United States: Current problems, future possibilities. In S.Allan (Ed.), The Routledge companion to news and journalism (pp.95-104). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Gunasekara, F.I. (2011). Alcohol laws in New Zealand – a chance to create an enduring legacy. Retrieved from
Hamilton, M. (2004). All the news that’s fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hampton, M. (2010). The fourth estate ideal in journalism history. In S. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge companion to news and journalism (pp.3-12). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Haas, T. (2004). Public journalism. Encyclopaedia of international media and communications, Vol 3, 617-629.
Heider, D., McCombs, M., & Poindexter, M.P. (2005). What the public expects of local news: Views on public and traditional journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4), 952-967.
Jones, A.S. (2009). Losing the news: The future of the news that feeds democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kohut, A. (2001). Public support for the watchdog is fading. Columbia Journalism Review, 40(1), 52.
McCombs, M. Jr., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
McQuail, D. (1976). Review of sociological writing on the press. London: HMSO.
Marder, M. (1999/2000). This is watchdog journalism. Nieman Reports, 53/54(4/1), 78-79.
Matheson, D. (2010). The watchdog’s new bark: Changing forms of investigative reporting. In S. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge companion to news and journalism (pp.82-92). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Morrison, A. (2002). In J.McGregor & M.Comrie (Eds.), What’s news? Reclaiming journalism in New Zealand (pp. 56-71). Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
Neale, I. (2011, August 7). Teen dads see having kids as a cash cow. Sunday Star Times, p.12
Poindexter, P.M., Heider, D., & McCombs, M
Rosen, J. (1993). Beyond objectivity. Nieman Reports, 47(4), 48-53.
Rosen, J. (2006). The people formerly known as the audience. Press Think. Retrieved from http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html on 15 August 2010.
Schultz, J. (1998). Reviving the fourth estate: Democracy, accountability and the media. (Selections from Introduction, pp.1-10; Chapter 3, pp.47-65). Cambridge: University Press.
Stylianou, G. (2011, August 10). Jobless young ‘will take lives’. Christchurch Press, p.6.
Venables, D. (2002). Public journalism. In J.McGregor & M.Comrie (Eds.), What’s news? Reclaiming journalism in New Zealand (pp.259-270). Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
Ward, S. (1998). An answer to Martin Bell. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 3(1), 121-125.
Williams, D. (2011, August 10). Owners unite to create central city village. Christchurch Press, p.24.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document