Preview

Was Lincoln Justified In Prosecuting A War Justified?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
208 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Lincoln Justified In Prosecuting A War Justified?
As of today i didn't really know all this about Lincoln, now knowing all this Lincoln is no justified in prosecuting the war the way he did, that the only beneficial thing that came out of this war even for his own benefits was the freedom of many slaves, which they are human beings, and knowing the worse was the many slave that die because they were the one in combat was a disaster. Is very in human to see how people use power to get what they want not caring about the harm that will cause others. Like the professor says,"he didn’t fight the war to free the slaves. Instead, he freed some of the slaves to help fight the war." all Lincoln did was to be beneficiary of doing that, and by doing that he already had all the slaves on his side, cause

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The passage given, was a hard one to read, not because of the length or the style of which it was set up, but because reading that everything I was ever taught about President Lincoln was a lie, or almost one. I want to say my favorite President has changed, but to who? The big story about Honest Abe, was that he freed the slaves, because he preached to the people, the Union won the war because they allowed blacks to be with them in battle, making a stronger ‘Union’. That seemed good enough for me, but the thought that he didn’t actually care if they were freed or not, was scandalous to me. He treated them like equals, yet he didn’t…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He comes to us, too, as the Great Emancipator who headed the North off to Civil War to free the slaves and subsequently offered his kindred Southerners a delicate and forgetting hand. Lincoln was the man who headed the slaves into the common war and eventually liberated them from the Southerners, whom he'd lended a hand after the war. This is the generally speaking perspective of Lincoln, which isn't fully accurate, and is demonstrated to not be totally right however history, demonstrating that he didn't have totally intensive and reliable perspectives and didn't dependably help nullification. He acknowledged how wrong it was that subjection ought to exist whatsoever in a self announced free and edified republic. Lincoln's emotions of the Declaration of Independence, which inside and out say that all men are made equivalent, disaffirm his nations agreeableness and shared traits around bondage. This at last pushes Lincoln to change his perspectives on subjection, instead of supporting it before and all around the war, while it was vital. Kansas-Nebraska Act -The enactment toppled the old Missouri Compromise line, which rejected subjection from the limitless northern zone of the old Louisiana Purchase domain. The demonstration then built another recipe for managing subjection in the national grounds: now Congress might stay out of the matter, and the individuals of every region might choose whether to hold or bandit the organization. This gesture toppled the Missouri Compromise which had awhile ago avoided region in the Louisiana Purchase domain and besides counteracted Congress from mediating, permitting the individuals to take care of their own issues with prominent power. This gesture advanced Congress' freedom to its nation and made it recoil and provided for it no force in the bargains and contentions its nation was managing and additionally left open a yawning opening of chance for professional bondage control. At that point in 1857 came the notorious Dred…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Lincoln loved blacks as much as history portrays, why did he have slaves? This is why it was a belief of mine that Lincoln only wanted to prove his power to the Confederacy. At any given moment, if Lincoln was “anti-slavery”, he could have fought to free those slaves. Instead, he was two faced, and had certain slaves freed only to send them away to foreign land.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the United States all the president has the responsibility and the control of everything, because they're the president of the country and they have to be honsty with the people who live in the United States.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On February 3, 1865 a peace conference was held on a steamboat called river queen in Hampton roads Virginia. The U.S. and confederate states held this conference to discuss how to end the American civil war. Abraham Lincoln meets with confederate officials to possibly come up with a peace agreement but refuses to grant any positions and ends the meeting within hours. The topics talked about during the conference are the following: be alliances with France in Mexico, slavery involved with war, surrendering, and about the south and property. Both Lincoln and seaward agreed on the issue of slavery.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a connection between the requirement of African American people to fight in the war against the union rebellion and Lincoln’s idea about slavery. Lincoln was a wise man and knew what to expect and what had to be done. He has to come to an agreement. Lincoln promised freedom to the slaves if the slaves were willing to fight in the war against the union army. The book Abraham Lincoln, slavery, and the civil war book states that “why should they do anything for us, if we will do nothing for them?"…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, he appeals to the guilt and obloquy felt about the war by the American people, both north and south. In order to do this, Lincoln calls to action those responsible: everyone, even himself; he wants the southerners to willfully renounce slavery because it is wrong according to the will of God saying: “It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces” and with this, he appeals to the consciences of the former southern slave owners, and to show them that banning slavery was right. (44-47). Furthermore, as stated earlier, he uses his position as president to convince the people to strive for this change, but this might also cause a rift between himself and the southerners. In order to remedy this, he references the bible which both the northerners and…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He was doing what he believed was right for all citizens. Lincoln was the biggest leader in the civil war and lead the north to victory. To help the north win he rallied his troops by giving his famous Gettysburg address. As Sherman marched triumphantly…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abraham Lincoln is known as "The Great Emancipator" who freed the slaves. Yet in the early part of his career and even in the early stages of his presidency, Lincoln had no objection to slavery where it already existed, namely, in the Southern states. As a savvy politician, he always wanted to maintain the union, and he would use any device to keep the country together. However, his views on slavery evolved during his presidency, and the personal opposition towards slavery that he claimed he always had began to show through in his policy. As Lincoln noted in 1864, "I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel" (Lorence 306). Despite such strongly worded beliefs, Lincoln policies towards slavery often shifted for the sake of political expedience. For example, he pledged that states would be compensated for their loss of property as a result of emancipation to keep the border states from seceding. Still, by 1862 Lincoln had become firm in his convictions that slavery must be abolished. He even pressed for a constitutional amendment to ensure freedom to all the slaves. Lincoln espoused strong anti-slavery views, but he often put what he viewed as the good of the country ahead of the cause. Despite many detours along the way, he proved himself to be "The Great Emancipator." As a self-made politician from humble origins, Lincoln struggled in his early political life to define his identity. He described his childhood as "The short and simple annals of the poor. That's my life, and that's all you or any one else can make of it" (Oates 4). Lincoln felt extremely embarrassed about his background and worked his entire life to overcome the limitations he faced. He made himself a "literate and professional man who commanded the respect of his colleagues" (Oates 4). It is difficult to assess Lincoln's early views on slavery and race because they were constantly changing in an effort to achieve such…

    • 2258 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    GREAT EMANCIPATOR?

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although many people even today still consider President Lincoln the great emancipator, many scholars feel as if Radical Republicans were the main reason for the decisions Lincoln made about slavery during his presidency. In fact, two of the most important acts of Lincoln’s presidency were pushed through Congress by Radical Republicans. A scholar named Henry A Rhodes from the University of XXX feels that Lincoln was definitely rather reluctant to side with the Radicals rather than pushing with them. He says “Lincoln was somewhat of a moderate in comparison to the Radicals. He sided with them when it suited his purposes in his strategy for emancipation for the American Negro.” Rhodes says “This is evident from his endorsements of the two Confiscation Acts and the bill which prohibited slavery in the District of Columbia that were pushed through Congress by the Radical Republicans” (Rhodes, XX.) He feels the Confiscation Acts were substantial to the war and that Lincoln receives the credit when really the Radical Republicans should get it. He says “This act gave Lincoln the authority to use Negroes as soldiers in the fighting of the Civil War. As noted earlier, Lincoln was only in favor of using blacks as soldiers to help replace the shortage of Union soldiers and because he felt that this policy would shorten the War”(Rhodes, XX.) Rhodes feels that Lincoln is receiving credit that really should be received by the Radical Republicans.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Never boring: simple words that describe the simple life of one of the greatest American Heroes of all time. Over the years we have come to understand the Great Emancipator’s struggles and his determination to push for a better future for his nation. In the blink of war, Lincoln came to the nation’s rescue. But was Lincoln really the Great Emancipator? Was Lincoln actually opposed to the slavery movement? Or did he not consider the blacks to be an equal race? Did he make an active effort to free the slaves? Or was the emancipation a never Lincoln’s priority? In my opinion, although freeing the slaves was never Lincoln’s top priority during his tenure as president, Lincoln was sympathetic towards them. His main issue was the war and the probability of the union getting split into two. I believe that Lincoln may not have always seen the black race as equals and that the emancipation came about as a by-product of the Union getting saved.…

    • 2916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln believed that slavery was insufferable and intolerable, and that Blacks should have their natural rights like the Whites and suggested to relocate the Black in order to gain their freedom.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Lincoln prevented free voting to allow for the states to decide their own fate. One could easily argue that Lincoln began an entire war, not over slavery, but over state's rights. Lincoln staunchly felt a strong, centralized government was necessary and he clearly wasn't…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    THESIS: It was necessary for Lincoln to change his views during the war because it was what the people needed and how the U.S./Union won the war against the Confederacy. He was able to show people that he knew what was going on at the time and had a solid plan to bring the South back with the North to continue a unified country. With every new change he was able to gather his ideas easier and share his points with the right and needed decisions. By changing his views and opinions he was able to create an honest campaign and war statement.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many historians question Lincoln’s motives for entering the civil war. While Lincoln states that it was in order to preserve the union some historians believe that he was hoping to end slavery upon victory. However, it doesn’t matter what his motives were because when it comes down to it slavery was ended because of him. He issued the emancipation proclamation that abolished slavery for good. This Act illustrates his courage because he had the gall to do the moral and proper thing against all odds.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays