Preview

Was Hiroshima Bombing Wrong Or Wrong Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
520 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Hiroshima Bombing Wrong Or Wrong Essay
"It's too bad that there were so many casualties, but if you tell me how to fight a war without killing people, then I'm going to be the happiest man in the world," said Theodore "Dutch" Van Kirk, the last living crew member that dropped the bomb on Hiroshima. The U.S. dropped two bombs, on Hiroshima, and later Nagasaki three days later. The bombs were built under the project code-named “The Manhattan Project,” named after the place they were constructed, Manhattan, New York. And an estimated total of 225,000 people was killed or wounded on account of the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Hiroshima and Nagasaki Death Toll). While dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was terrible, it was not wrong for the United States because an invasion of Japan …show more content…
Aside from the innocent death of the bombs, the U.S were right in their decision to bomb Japan. The casualties from both sides, Japan and America, would be greater if America would have invaded instead of bombing Japan. The History Channel states that General Douglas MacArthur and many other top military officials advised Truman that the casualties would be up to a million American soldiers lives (Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki). Also, using the atomic bomb showed the world how devastating of a weapon it is. Dickinson Quotes, “Science has reached to the fringe of the universe and stolen the secret of life inviolate since the beginning of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although the bomb would indeed wipe out the enemy troops, who's to say that innocent civilians wouldn’t lose their lives. Truman had to think about that in his decision making process. Would more lives have been saved setting off the bomb? As strong as the atomic bomb was, Truman believed it was the way to go. The initial shock was a couple of miles, but the aftershock covered hundreds of miles more. According to the BBC article, estimates suggested that the final toll was about 140,000, of Hiroshima's 350,000 population, including military personnel and those who died later from radiation. Many also suffered long-term sickness and disability. The bomb in Nagasaki killed nearly 74,000 and a similar number were injured. The bombs ended up killing many civilians and military soldiers, because of how far the bomb and radiation reached. The two atomic bombs left no choice for the Japanese. They surrendered to the Allies on 14 August 1945. Out of the two Japanese depots that were targeted, civilians were also involved and killed. Many people condemned Truman and America over the decision. Politically, many did not want Truman to be any more involved and became careful in who they would put into office. A disadvantage towards this decision was that the surrounding cities suffered extensive damage. Also the home islands were subjected to naval blockades that made food and fuel extremely scarce. Research identified…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The money that was involved in the creation of the atomic bomb was tremendous. It was massive, if it wasn’t experimented on then it was believed that the Americans would be highly disappointed. After the Japanese attack, President Truman took that as a great opportunity to use the bombing. The outcome was successful because it caused an atrocious amount of deaths in…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the bombs saved more lives than it claimed. To illustrate, many American and Japanese lives would have been lost in the battles to capture Japan. Similar to the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, the Japanese would never surrender until all of their forces were lost, and this would result in a copious amount of death and despair. The Allied generals estimated over a 1,000,000 lives would have been lost in the upcoming battles if Truman did not decide to end the war with the atomic bombs. Additionally, the Japanese threatened to execute 100,000 Allied prisoners of war if they decided to invade the Japanese mainlands. Thus, by dropping the atomic bombs, many lives, including both Japanese and American, have been saved by bringing the war to an abrupt stop. Furthermore, the Japanese were given a fair warning before the Allies dropped the Atomic bombs. On July 26, a few days before the dropping of the bombs, President Truman issued a final ultimatum for the Japanese forces to surrender or be bombed. Yet, Emperor Hirohito declared that he would not surrender. On account of Emperor Hirohito not surrendering, Truman decided to drop the Atomic Bombs to end the war quickly. Hence, the Japanese were given a choice to surrender or to be bombed, but they chose to be bombed. Although many argue that the Atomic Bombs were not justified because they…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “On the morning of August 6, 1945, the American B-29 Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later another B-29, Bock’s Car, released one over Nagasaki. Both caused enormous casualties and physical destruction.” (Maddox 1). These disastrous events have weighted upon the American conscience ever since that day in history. Even though there are some people that disagree with the dropping of the atomic bomb, President Truman’s decision was very critical because he prevented the loss of many American lives, Japanese soldiers fought with no notion of ever surrendering, and it brought an end to a bloody war.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The atomic bomb shouldn’t have been used in World War 2 to defeat Japan. America could have used other alternatives then the deadly atomic bomb. President Truman should of waited a few more weeks for russia to declare war on Japan. The thought of invasion by both of America and Russia probably had an even more scared effect on the Japanese government then the Atomic Bombs. America could of also continue the conventional bombings and blockade.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman also had to think about the lives of the Americans. If the United States did not drop this nuclear bomb, then the war would have lasted longer and the American soldiers would have had to continue to fight the Japanese in the air, water, and ground. This would have caused many more American casualties, and would’ve hurt the American military in the long run. While Truman was taking all these consequences into consideration he received a letter from General Groves stating, “If the United States continues to lead in the development of atomic energy weapons, its future will be much safer and the chances of preserving world peace greatly increased.” General Groves was correct in his statement saying that the atomic bomb would be much safer in the future.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the benefit of this program brought not only America year into the future but the entire world with it. The research done to make these bombs possible allowed for multiple advancements in the fields of radiation and cancer. It was these effects that the Japanese's did not understand when examining those affected but the blast. The use of similar radiation is used to cure cancer. The advancements made by the dropping of the bombs would have never been examined due to the simple facts that is would not be considered "humane". The decision that President Truman made may not have been considered humane to most people. However, the decision was not his alone it determined by a committee of advisors who believed it best…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though many innocent lives were lost, the atomic bomb was justifiable to use in this case. More lives could have been lost if the U.S. would have invaded Japan. More specifically, the bomb saved Japanese lives. From the battle of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, we saw how extreme they were. If we were to take the mainland, we could have wiped out the entire nation, which is surplus compared to the lives lost from the bomb.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb was a difficult decision for one man to make. However, before he could ever make that difficult decision he first had to be told the weapon was even an option. The atomic bomb was a closely guarded secret that only a select few even at the highest levels in the government had knowledge of. So when the decision was made to use the bomb it was made to save the lives of not only American servicemen but those of the Japanese empire as well. That faithful decision did take the lives of many civilians of Japan but it also saved more that it ever took. President Truman sacrificed a few to save the many which is extremely hard to accept when the majority of those killed were civilians of all ages…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, killing thousands of innocent people! The United States did it to force Japan to surrender and end World War II. To this present day it still and will remain a controversy whether or not the US was in the right or wrong of bombing Hiroshima. I argue that the US shouldn’t have attacked Hiroshima the way they did.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “On August 16, 1945, Enola Gray, a U.S. bomber, dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan, and three days later, a second atomic bomb destroyed the city of Nagasaki” (Hiroshima and Nagasaki). Many people argue whether or not these bombings were ethical and legal. The U.S. killed innocent people in order to “break the morale” of the Japanese population. The U.S. also broke many of the statements in the “Just War” doctrine. Theses bombings caused many people to face harmful amounts of radiation and die. I believe that President Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs was unethical and he did not justify using nuclear weapons in order to get Japan to surrender.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays