Preview

Was Germany responsible for the Outbreak of WW1?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
380 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Germany responsible for the Outbreak of WW1?
Molly Morris
29.10.2013

‘German Aggression was responsible for the outbreak of a general European War in August 1914’.
How far do you agree?

There is much evidence to suggest that German Aggression was responsible for the outbreak of a general European war in August 1914. Both Sources 1 and 2 play on the idea that both the Kaiser and Bethmann Hollweg used its foreign policies to create tension within Europe which consequently led to a European war. Source 1 argues ‘Germany’s foreign policy aims were focused on annexation, and that she went to was to achieve these aims’ highlighting the forceful nature which Germany could have possessed in this era. However, Source 3 argues that infact the growing tension in Europe arguably led Germany to fight a defensive war and that it was infact Britain, Russia and France through Germany’s fear of invasion who stimulated the war; ‘The British were determined to maintain their naval superiority, whatever the financial and political cost’. This leads to the judgement that although there is some evidence to suggest that Germany did fight a defensive war to some extent, overall German aggression did lead to the outbreak of a general European war.

Firstly, the idea that Germany did fight an aggressive war can be seen through Germany’s increasing desire for European Hegemony. The fact that Germany was slowly but surly disabling European peace in its quest for Weltpolitik shows how Germany were looking for confrontation. The Moroccan Crisis’ of 1905-11 highlights the Kaiser’s desire to expand the German empire into other continents as well as just Europe. The consequences of this crisis furthermore increased the bitterness between the Germans and the French; showing how the idea of Weltpolitik played a large part in the why Germany had an aggressive attitude to war. Both Source 1 and 2 follow the line of argument that the aggression had led to war, and that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Finding the Middle Ground

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1914 is arguably one of the most influential years in human history. Not only did it introduce the world to the practice of total warfare, but it also demonstrated the devastating outcome of rising political and economic tensions in Europe, as well as the inevitable conflict that is rooted in our global anarchic system. Almost a century later, historians continue to study the catastrophic events that occurred in 1914 and one of the most controversial and sensitive topics is the debate on who is to blame for the outbreak of WWI. Many would be quick to point their finger at Germany, including historian Fritz Fischer, who validly argues that Germany was responsible for WWI based upon their nation’s political and militaristic aims to establish Germany as a world power. On the other hand, historian Paul Ritter questions Fischer’s argument, believing that Germany did not intentionally plan for WWI to occur. Both points are valid, yet the truth may not lie on either extreme sides of the spectrum. Rather, the long-term and short-term responsibility of WWI is shared between Germany, the conflictive nature of the world’s political system, and those nation states that exist within such a system during 1914. Therefore, the combination of a precarious political environment and an ambitious militaristic intention and course of action holds Germany highly, yet not completely, responsible for WWI.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WW1 DBQ

    • 354 Words
    • 1 Page

    kindling Europe’s rivalry until the outbreak of World War I. Militarism refers to the “ …

    • 354 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The 28th of July 1914 marks the date when Austria Hungary declared war on Serbia, the months that ensued saw the chain reaction like declarations of war by many countries ultimately leading to the outbreak of the First World War. Many historians over the years have tried to determine the causes and reasons as to why the First World War broke out, one such historian was AJP Taylor. Taylor was a British historian who specialised in 20th century European diplomacy; he wrote several books discussing who and what caused the First World War. Taylors views indicate he believes that the war can be blamed on Austria-Hungary, Germany and several key individuals, namely Count Berchtold the foreign minister of Austria-Hungary, German chancellor Bethmann Hollweg and Alfred Von Schlieffen a German strategist. Taylor believes that if these individuals acted differently the war could have been avoided. However, Taylor does not discuss the September Programme, outlining Germanys aim to create a ‘Mitteleuropa’ in Europe, thus calling in to question the persuasiveness of Taylor’s argument.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Von Bismarck worked on the two issues, unification of Germany and isolation of France (Germany's mortal enemy). He believed that as long as Britain, Russia and Italy were assured of the peaceful nature of the German Empire, the French could be contained. Kaiser Wilhelm II’s style of working and understanding of foreign relations strengthened and unified other European powers against Germany in time for World War I. There are numerous examples of how reversal in policies of Wilhelm II acted as a catalyst to trigger off sensitive issues such as militarism, nationalism, imperialism and caused imbalance in the alliances leading to the onset of The First World War.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of the sources give different impressions as to wether Germany's leaders are responsibe for the outbreak of the First World War. Source 1 seems to strongly suggest that German leaders and the German Government did in fact push for the war with Hewitson blaming the Army and suggesting that Germany was looking for an opportunity to start war however he does not fully support the view that German leaders were responsible.Porter and Armour (Source 2) strongly supports this view by again pointing to the millitary and prime minister Bethmann Hollweg looking for an opportunity to wage war but again not fully placing the blame on Germany but looking at the threating actions of Russia and Britain. In contrast to both Source 1 and 2 Norman Stone ( Source 3) does not blame Germany, instead he suggest that the tension in Europe for the last decade finally reached an ultimatum in the July crisis and the war was the fault of all Great powers.…

    • 899 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The outbreak of the First World War occurred in 1914 and there are many reasons for why the outbreak happened. Blackbourn writes that Germany “had done much to create international tension” and this implies that Germany were responsible for the outbreak of war as tensions were rising between countries in Europe due to the relations they had with several other countries. This had a knock on effect due to the Alliance system which was in place so that countries were protected by their allies. It meant that any sort of conflict between two countries escalated quickly due to the countries across Europe being locked into an alliance. The importance of the Alliance system can be reinforced by L.F.C Turner who writes “Bethmann pushed Austria into a premature declaration of war” which suggests that Germany were responsible because they gave Austria a Blank Cheque which was Germany giving Austria permission to attack Serbia stating that they would help aid their attack on Serbia as they wanted the war to happen sooner rather than later. This is because they knew Russia was growing stronger and they were feeling encircled by the Triple Entente which was the alliances between Britain, France and Russia and they clearly felt threatened due to where they are placed geographically. Bethmann also writes in the source that Germany “built a battle fleet aimed at the British” which implies that Germany was aggressive…

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question of whether no single alliance or nation could be held responsible for the outbreak of war is a hotly debated topic. Source 2 strongly agrees with the statement giving the view that no one nation could be held responsible. However, source 1 gives the opposite view that German aggression was primarily responsible, which is supported, to a large extent by source 3, which highlights German imperialistic aims as being a key aggravator. However, it does also suggest that other great powers were also aggressive to some extent. This essay will focus on the idea that, primarily, German aggression was to blame.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay, we will focus on the development of the events on The Western Front where Germany faced France. All the powers had thought and planned their war strategy very accurately.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Berghahn, V.R. 1973. Germany and the Approach of War in 1914. New York: St. Martin 's Press.…

    • 9995 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1914, war broke out in Europe between the most powerful countries. There were a number of reasons why World War One broke out and this essay will examine these reasons.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the time period where Germany was looking to expand it’s reign outside of their borders, much of Europe was already under control of other powers and they were forced to focus their expansion on African territories. The problem with this plan of action was that the British navy was considered the strongest naval force in the world, and they already possessed control of many waterways leading to territories desired by both Great Britain and Germany. Due to this predicament, militarism in Germany began with great naval expansion “following the appointment of Admiral von Tirpitz as Secretary of State for the Navy in 1897” (Fulbrook 142). His push for rapid naval growth for means of both a deterrent to other nations and a means of competing with British naval forces lead to the creation of the Naval League and a strong national support for naval expansion, something that did not go unnoticed by other nations. German navy building brought about “a general sense that war was looming, and all European states began a race to be ready for war when it came” (Fulbrook 149). The rapid expansion of Germany in almost all regards and actions taken by other nations presented the inevitability of war, but other key factors also played major roles in the culmination of…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franco­Prussian war of 1871 and the Crimean War of 1853, war began to become a…

    • 1815 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Bismarck was dismissed in 1890, Germany set her sights on competing with England. Germany believed that land power was no longer sufficient and she needed to pursue building a greater navy to measure up to England's. In addition, in 1905, the Kaiser gave a speech in Morocco publically announcing “...Germany’s support for Moroccan independence and integrity” (41). This action was not a true act of value and morals, but rather one with hidden intentions, “... [the Kaiser] did mean to suggest was that Germany had as much of a claim to Morocco as any other greedy European power” (41). This backdoor finagling was an example of the danger of imperialism. Additional countries would feel the tensions similar…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The industrial ambitions of Germany illustrate the rapid growth of Wilhelm II’s ambitions in Europe after many decades of economic prosperity in the 19th century. These industrial developments define the increasing ambition of Germany to rival the naval power of Great Britain and the military strength of France on the Continent. In this context, the Kaiser sought develop a world-class modern navy that would threaten the imperialism of England as a dominant force in Europe. More so, Germany; massive heavy industrial complex allowed for the building of large warships, artillery, and other modern weapons of total war, which posed a direct threat to the neighboring European nations. Politically, England France responded to German industrial militarization by producing its own weapons of total war that created massive arms race throughout the 1900s and into the 1910s.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    World war 1

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The next cause was militarism. Document C states Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy, Great Britain, Russia, and France has very increased in growth in armaments from 1890 to 1914. From 1890 to 1914 the amount of British pounds spent on the army and navy from Germany and Austria-Hungary increased almost 400%. Also, Great Britain, Russia, and France spent over 200% from the same period of time. In document D Bernhard von Bulow, the German chancellor, spoke “...German people will be a hammer or an avil.” Bulow worried that England, France, and Russia…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays