As time goes on, the farmers strived to get rid of all those taxes they had been charged since a long time. The political scientist, John P. Roche highly argue on founding fathers were not the group who are interested to benefits the wealthy people, but they are the great reformers who gave the United States its name and the people their needs. He state that the signing the articles of confederation make a stronger national government, national court system, helped to regulate national trade and denied all power of the states. This is fact, but it did not help the poor people who were begging for their economic rights. The illegal convention began to hold in some of the western counties. The general court (the legislature) precedes the meeting in Hampshire county, in order to take away the cattle of farmers who hadn’t paid their debts, to grab their land and all property they had. They were charged terribly. After this panic, the farmers draw up the groups in order to raise their voice against injustice. Howard Zinn mentioned the message of farmer to the judges that, “The voice of the people in this county is such that the court shall not enter this courthouse until such time as the people shall have redress of the grievances they labor under at the present”. (Zinn, 128)
In conclusion, after reading an articles based on founding fathers, which is considered as an argumentative article. In the article, John P. Roche supports the founding father; He believes founding fathers were not just the revolutionaries but also the great reformers, who led the nation and the people into the path of prosperity and happiness. The other guy named Howard Zinn does not agree with John P. Roche’s view. I am supportive and harmonize with the ideas of Howard Zinn. The ideas he has provided in articles clearly shows that the founding father were the reformers, but only for the people who has a tons of money and property. In the articles, I am more likely to agree with what radical...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document