Was Alexander the Great really great?

Good Essays
Was Alexander the Great really ‘Great’?

Alexander of Macedon was perceived as ‘great’ by his contemporaries. His achievements in early life indicated that he had every chance of becoming ‘great’. To consider how ‘great’ he really was one must define greatness. Firstly, let us consider military innovation. The aim of military innovation is to improve military effectiveness. This uses lots of ideas to try and produce the best army using the best tactics. Alexander’s main tactic was the phalanx. This was created by his father but when he took over he used it well and this alone defeated most of the opposing army. Alexander’s tactics were created based on what he expected the enemy to. The enemy, of course, didn’t always do this so it was a problem when this happened. Alexander was left to think on the spot with no tactics to go by. Usually, Alexander managed to pull back but when he didn’t he had let his army down. Overall, Alexander’s military innovation techniques are very good considering the fact that the enemy quite often does as expected. Next, popularity. Was Alexander the Great popular? Well… yes and no! His people, the Macedonians, loved him. He was conquering many lands and bringing back the precious Persian gold. He was conquering many lands and not many of his people were getting killed. What more could you want from a leader? Well, that was what all the Macedonians were asking but all the other people that he had defeated were definitely not agreeing with this statement. He marched into their land, defeated their army and now was ruler of all of them. He wanted to be popular with them but it never worked due to the fact that he had killed many of their friends and family. All in all, due to popularity alone he was definitely not great. His people liked him but all those he had taken over hated him. Speed of conquests was also a big thing that made you great. Alexander was extremely quick but was that good? He had conquered most of the world

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Alexander’s name is usually followed by the name “great.” He was a conqueror, which means that he took over places and named himself ruler of all he had taken captive. In this case, Alexander was hoping to unite Greece, as well as conquer Persia. He is very well-known among historians today, and he has also accomplished a lot in his time period. However, the name “great” may have been given to him too easily and without careful examination of how he truly treated others, not just how he saw himself.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greatness is an umbrella term that can hold several different meanings and interpretations. In the case of Alexander the Great, it has a very specific meaning that reflects upon the achievements and success of his life time, despite the many character flaws and failings he undoubtedly possessed. Alexander the Great definitely deserves this appellation for three main reasons. Firstly, he conquered an incredibly vast area for his young age and lack of experience; secondly he left his mark on society which has lasted till contemporary day; and thirdly he completely revolutionized military techniques and styles.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In history its not just about the great things that were achieved and what was accomplished, its also about who did it and why.?.. Throughout history several wars were fought, one well known leader who fought these wars was Alexander The “Great” Even though Alexander had achieved a lot in his life as a leader did he deserve the “Great” at the end of his name.? To be great as a person and as a leader it means to be Honorable, Brave, Ambitious and Virtuous. Did he have those qualities of being great.? Was he a good enough leader?…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander the Great was a powerful and wise military leader. His knowledge of the battle field led him to many victories; yet many of his battles ended very bloody for both sides. However, he did this for the good of his people and empire. Alexander the Great is the “great” king and military leader that many people perceive him as because he is wise, merciful, and willing to learn about different cultures.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander was great because of his intelligence. In document B it states the story behind the last superior battle Alexander fought and how he used his intelligence to strike at the enemy Prince Porous.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the other hand Alexander the Great was not so great because many tactics where inherited from his father,Philip II. Alexander's father had many tactics such as the phalanx, however Alexander decided to improve on his father's idea and make it better and stronger so he could defeat more enemies. The phalanx was his fathers idea but improving on the idea shows that he was intelligent and skilful. This shows that…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was a Macedonian king. He was a great conqueror, but some believe that he was ruthless in doing so. He had many successful conquests which led him to become one of the most powerful leaders of all of the ancient world. However, there is much controversy of whether Alexander the Great deserved the title ‘Great.’ But, based on my knowledge, Alexander the Great was truly ‘great’ because he was an astounding military leader, he was merciful, and respectful to the peoples he conquered.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP World History

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A second greatness: maybe Alexander was great because he had an enormous __________ on the world after his death. After Alexander of Macedon died, everyone from the Romans to Napoleon loved him, and he was an important __military________ model for many generals…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page

    Many people think that Alexander the Great was truly great because of all his accomplishments, but not all of the things he did were great. He did lots of cruel things to people and animals just because he wanted to gain more power. Alexander has killed approximately 100,000 people only in four major battles (Alexander’s Legacy Doc E). Alexander was a prince who was born in macedonia of 356 BC. Alexander was very arrogant. He was taught by a philosopher Aristotle. He taught him subjects like, politics, sports, and warfare. Philip, Alexander’s father built the macedonian army into a deadly fighting machine, this sparked alexander’s interest and was eager to to lead the army. And Alexander got his chance to lead at the age of 20, because Philip…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Question: What do you think was the single greatest accomplishment of Alexander and why? Does he deserve the appellation of "Great?" Why or why not?…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great aspired more hopes and dreams than any man who had ever existed in the history of humanity. He was a noble hero, a righteous politician, flawless tactician, and even referred himself as the son of Zeus. To acquire the title “Great” one must do great deeds, but was Alexander truly great? By age 30, he had conquered what was the known world and that alone is a feat worth titling as great . Alexander merits the title of “Great” because he is still talked about today for his conquering of Persia and the spreading of Greek culture throughout his conquering.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great, king of Macedonia was undoubtedly one of the most powerful and influential leaders in history. His unprecedented control over his military as well as a strong economic backbone enabled him to conquer the majority of the known civilization. He ruled with fear and conquered through strength. Yet when taking a step back and categorizing great leaders, does “Alexander the Great” truly top the charts; or is his name the foundation of a faulty reputation?…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The greatness of Alexander III, as he was originally, has been disputed in the past. His legend has survived for thousands of years, and his name is well-known, but just how great was he? In answering this question it is necessary to define the terms 'deserve' and 'great'. For these purposes, to deserve will mean to be worthy of. Great has many meanings, and will be defined as: important; grand; distinguished; remarkable in ability or character; competent; or above what is normal, with implied admiration. Alexander, son of Philip, the king of the Macedonians, was more than most men. His achievements were admirable, and his success brilliant. His accomplishments were grand, momentous and distinguished, having huge impact on the history of the world. Alexander's ability was well and truly remarkable, and his overall life was incredible. He truly fits into the criteria of a great person. The small young boy, who, although outnumbered, captured the mighty Persian Empire, was more than an average person. He may not have been the perfect man, and some may argue he had a cruel heart, but he was surely great. Alexander the Great, as he is now, was one of the greatest men ever, and truly deserves the title 'the great'.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander the Great is looked at in two different ways, good and bad. In my opinion this young Macedonian king did not earn his title. Although Alexander was considerate to some Persians, and religious customs and architecture, he was still a terrible man. While conquering his empire, he manage to mindlessly kill troops, servants/peasants, and sell innocent citizens for his own personal gain.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now, instead of simply discussing his most glorious battle and successful expansion of his empire by overthrowing the Persian Empire. And although they were a major success to his rising to power. People must be able to understand exactly how even after defeating his enemies, Alexander ran these new additions to his empire and effected them through cultural influence. While Alexander was exceedingly bright, some may have doubted how he chose to run them. Even after the overthrowing of Darius III, Alexander still wanted to add more to his empire. He even went as far as India to overthrow, which only failed due to homesick soldiers. Thus, this had to be Alexander's greatest flaw, he didn't know when enough was enough. Now, back to subject at…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays