Preview

Warren's Argument Against Abortion

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1421 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Warren's Argument Against Abortion
Warren’s argument is convenient for abortion advocates, if embryos and fetuses are less than people, then it may be morally permissible to end their life before birth. However, Warren’s premise and argument is flawed, and she fails to see the indications of personhood outside of consciousness. Primarily, moral personhood is not defined by an ability to reason, it is instead defined by a state of being. Philosopher Francis Beckwich, discusses moral personhood in relation to abortion when he discusses the substance of the human being, a quality which, he says, persists through change, “each kind of living organism or substance, including the human being maintains identity through change as well as possessing a nature or essence that makes …show more content…
This argument is easily rebutted, and Janet Hadley argues against it by claiming that the potential for personhood does not equal moral value, “How far back does potentiality go–to the individual sperm or egg? No anti-abortion advocate have yet proposed rescuing eggs or sperm in order to save lives” (Hadley,68) Hadley and other pro-abortion advocates are correct in this argument, however, they fail to realize why killing a fetus is actually wrong. Philosopher Don Marquis, in his famous work, Why Abortion is Wrong, gives an explanation of why death is undesirable, “The loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences, activities, projects, and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one’s future.” Marquis goes on to explain that this is why abortion is immoral, because it takes away the potential experiences and future that the child will have. (Marqus) But it is not wrong because of the fetus’ potential personhood, but it is already a person and killing it would rob it of it’s future …show more content…
Multiple studies provide solid affirmation that, after abortions, a disproportionate amount of women suffer from mental disabilities including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and depression. Psychologists Jesse Cougle, David Reardon, and Priscilla Coleman, in a 2003 study, compared women who, when pregnant for the first time, had a abortion, and those who birthed the child. The researchers found a sixty-five percent increase in depression risk for the women who aborted the fetus. (Cougle) This study is, however, only one piece of evidence for their claim. David Fergusson, a notable psychologist, in 2008 found that women who had a abortion were more likely to suffer from mental disorders. Fergusson estimates that post abortion mental illness acounts for 1.5 percent to 5.5 percent of all mental illness. (Fergesson) Many, including Theresa Burke, PhD, claim that many women suffer from a form of PTSD in the years following abortions. In her article, Abortion and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder she recounts personal stories of women who suffered greatly in the wake of an abortion. “Terry is plagued by nightmares. There is always a little girl crying for ‘mommy,’ with her arms outstretched and her eyes filled with fear and abandon. Terry usually takes strong barbiturates each night to avoid this painful

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jonathan Glover, in his article Matters of Life and Death casts dispersions on both pro-abortion and anti-abortion debates citing them as too knee-jerk emotional reactions diminishing the inherent complexity of the other side (1. Glover, CC2006, p. 0110). Glover comprehensively addresses the key points of both sides of the abortion debate and evaluates their inherent virtues, especially for those who hold these opinions, then methodically points out its flaws. Ultimately, Glover comes to the conclusion that though a fetus is a human at the moment of conception, the right to abort lies with the mother and her own self-determination.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Warren states that there is no limitation to abortion and it is always justifiable. A fetus or infant are not considered persons. To Warren it is wrong to kill an innocent human being but a fetus is not a human being, so therefore, it is not wrong to kill a fetus. A fetus or infant has not reached personhood due to the five traits which Warren describes makes a person. The traits that make a person, according to Warren are: consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity,…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Other pro-choice advocates such as Judith Jarvis Thomson argue contrary to the moral argument (personhood) they argue for body autonomy which places the interest of the woman first. Central to the view is the claim that no human being regardless of their moral status is permitted to use another human beings body against his or her will as a means to an end or an end in itself. Therefore the human fetus does not have the right to occupy the woman's body for survival if it is against her will.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate on abortion is one that still to this day has been constantly argued. This argument can be historically dated back to 1973, where a popular case was brought into the Supreme Court. This was the Roe V Wade case, which legalized abortions in “abortion in earlier months of pregnancy without restrictions and with restrictions in later months” (Lewis). Jane Roe was the alias for Norma McCorvery. She was the one arguing that in Texas there should be abortions allowed due to the protection of her rights as well as many other women that she was speaking for. The argument of abortion, however, works well beyond just the “rights” of the women wanting it. There is death involved as well as responsibilities that apparently many women aren’t ready for. However there are certain circumstances in which the pregnancy might not have been exactly planned or the child wouldn’t be safe in the living conditions of its parents. In this case, abortion should still not be looked at instead adoption should be thought about. The Roe V Wade case should be reconsidered to only have an abortion done if it was absolutely vital to the person asking for it.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Defense of Abortion

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In her article, A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that in some though not all cases, women have a right to abortion due to property rights in regards to their body, and the undue burden against these rights that would be placed on women if they are to be made responsible for any and all pregnancies. Thomson uses a variety of sometimes strange analogies to make her point that even if we give in to the argument that a fetus is a person, and thus has a right to life, this right to life does not necessarily ensure a right to sustain that life by using another person’s property, in this case the mother’s body, against her will.…

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomson, though, concludes that reasoning in this way is misguided, or at very best is not complete. In light of this, she begins by conceding the problem of personhood to her opponent; she supposes, for purposes of argumentation, that the fetus is a man from the instant of conception. She tries to demonstrate that if this concession is made, abortion is permissible in several cases…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To Warren, ‘human being’ is used in different contexts thinks that 'human being' is used in two different senses in both argument 1. and 2. In argument 1, 'human being' is being used in a moral connotation to mean a 'person' or 'true member of the moral community'. In (2), 'human being' means 'biological human'. That the fetus is a biological human organism Warren holds. But it does not mean that the fetus is a person, and it is persons with rights, essentially,…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marquis stated in his writing “Clearly, it is wrong to kill adult human beings. Clearly, it is not wrong to end the life of some arbitrarily chosen single human cell. Fetuses seem to be like arbitrarily chosen human cells in some respects and like adult humans in other respects.” (Wolff pg. 361). Marquis thus suggest that a proper contention for an anti-abortionist (Value of the future account) must be founded on the theory that if someone is not afforded the ‘opportunity’ to experience certain gains or projects due to the negligence/actions of others then whomever is responsible for the loss of that person’s life is in fact morally…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Thomson’s paper “A defense of Abortion,” she argues that abortion is morally permissible in some cases. Within the subject of abortion is the circular argument of if a fetus should be classified, and therefor given the same rights, as a person. One of the common opinions among lawmakers is that a fetus’s classification as a person begins at its viability. Others argue that a fetus is a person at the first sign of brain activity. There is no way to definitive answer so Thomson side steps this by assuming for the sake of argument that a fetus is a person and even such, there are cases where abortion should still be considered morally permissible. Thomson effectively argued or the moral permissibility…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ultimately, she argues that the fetus are not human beings therefore, we should not worry about if we should be able to kill them. She states that the fetus is genetically human, but she claims that research has shown that a fetus is not morally a human. Genetically human is known as a member of the homo sapiens species and being morally human can be summed up by saying one that gives us traits that make us have moral rights. She compiles a list of attributes that make a human morally human: consciousness, reason, self-motivated activity, communication, and self-awareness (not necessarily all of them). She concludes that because the fetus is not morally a human until around the third trimester, so the fetus is not a human until that point, which makes an abortion acceptable any time before the third trimester, or around twenty or so weeks. However, she doesn’t agree with allowing the individual to have an abortion done after reaching the state where the fetus is morally…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The subject of abortion is a very touchy matter in today’s society. Numerous people who feel abortion is a morally wrong thing to do, call themselves pro-life. Those who believe a woman can make the choice whether or not to have an abortion are pro-choice. It’s up to every individual to have an opinion on the topic in regards to what they feel is right. However, is it appropriate to force one’s beliefs on another person? Wouldn’t that be a breach of our first amendment, the separation between church and state?…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mary Anne Warren argues the position that abortion is morally permissible because the fetus is not a person therefore has no rights therefore not immoral to be killed. I shall argue that Warren’s position is invalid since her argument “appears to justify not only abortion, but infanticide as well.”…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They may also argue that that ten percent of women who go through a full-term pregnancy develop a mood disorder or even depression (pro action league); However, according to psychology today having an abortion could cause even worse effects such as Post Abortion Stress Syndrome which are the psychological aftereffects of abortion (Susanne Babbel Ph.D., M.F.T). Post Abortion Stress Syndrome (PASS) symptoms would be depression, anxiety and even suicidal thoughts. Studies have even shown that 40-60 percent of women get Post Abortion Stress Syndrome within the first few weeks after abortion (studentsforlife.org).…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article, Why Abortion is Immoral, Don Marquis argues that abortion is seriously morally wrong and should not be permitted except in certain cases (2012). The exceptions Marquis makes for when abortion is permissible include, in instances of rape, when the pregnancy could threaten the woman’s life, when the fetus is anencephalic, and during the first fourteen days after conception (2012). In his argument, Marquis attempts to bypass the traditional abortion debate which has largely focused on whether or not the fetus is a person (2012). By explaining why killing in general is wrong, Marquis will seek to prove that abortion is morally equivalent to killing an adult because it robs them of their future (2012).…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer, who holds a Utilitarianism belief, on the other hand would disagree with the statement above. They believe that abortion is permissible because unborn, and even new-born children, lack the essential characteristics of personhood which he and other Utilitarians believe are rationality, autonomy, and self-consciousness. They conclude from this that killing a new-born baby is never equivalent to killing a person who wants to continue to live as they are aware of their actions and can therefore do well for themselves and others. They use the example of doctors switching off life support machines when a person becomes ‘brain dead’, they would say that once a person is without brain activity and doesn’t possess the characteristics of personhood they should be let go. The same should go for new-borns and unborn children as they don’t have any kind of self-consciousness therefore they do not have the same amount of rights as a person.…

    • 675 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays