Preview

War Under The Law Of Nations A Duel Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1394 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War Under The Law Of Nations A Duel Analysis
CHAPTER ONE
“War Under the Law of Nations a Duel.”

In this section the author describes the parallel between the ancient custom of dueling between two men and wars between two nations. He argues the duel between two individuals involved a code similar to the rules warring nations abide by. The goal was simply to arbitrate differences between the parties (either individuals or nations). He points out that within a nation disputes between individuals or provinces are no longer settled as duels or small wars but settled in courts. Disputes between nations, however, are still settled with duels. CHAPTER TWO
“Why This Parallel Now?”

The author now explains that for the reasons in the previous section he calls the combat between France and
…show more content…
The leaders in Germany were at their country homes. He remarked that the Minister to the United States left France on the 1st of July and arrived Washington on the 14th. (army dismantling to army mobilizing for war) Prince Leopold in Germany had been invited become the king of Spain. France sent a protest about this invitation and because of later pretexts a Declaration of War. The minister of Germany was so unprepared that he committed suicide.

CHAPTER
…show more content…
She saw the kingdom without a sovereign, without an army, without generals, without money, surrounded on every side by implacable and victorious enemies; and her chief resource, in her present distresses, were the hopes which she entertained of peace, and even of assistance from the King of England.”

CHAPTER SIXTEEN
“Louis Napoleon”

The author describes how this man was first a candidate for Presidency of the Republic. He was inaugurated swearing to be faithful to the republic. Shortly after he plots to make himself Emperor and overthows the republic in a bloody rebellion. The author clearly believes this man responsible for the horror and suffering of French and German war ….building up the military and starting the war on pretext. He has numerous paragraphs describing his duplicity

CHAPTER SEVENTEEN
“Retribution”

In this section he suggests for the country or individual responsible for inflicting suffering during a war there will always be retribution…..sometimes in the course of that war …or sometimes after generations. He includes several

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The soldiers experienced such physical, emotional, and mental pain that they became unfit for fighting. It is estimated that almost one third of soldiers that died didn’t die from the war, but from the pain the war caused aside from fighting, such as: famine, emotional sickness, and mental breakdowns. The author, Erich Maria Remarque, shows the reader new perspectives and gives them different ideas to focus on to illustrate the severity of the Effects of World War One. In perception, all of the endless pain was pointless. The war was at a standstill point; such unnecessary harm was caused for what? To prove that one country can kill more than another? To prove that one alliance can outlast another? The main idea is this: The war was a waste of time, money, technology, and life. The book shows how the soldiers suffered, which adds to the idiocy that caused the war to continue. After reading the book, it is apparent that the war only caused harm. The war itself lead to millions of lives being lost, countries being torn apart, an economic downfall- the list is endless. In the end, there is only one final question readers and historians have to ask to understand the war: Was it really worth it all? After reading the book, the answer is no. The mental instability, physical pain, and emotional sadness was not worth…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tim O'Brien on Injustice

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The unclearness and uncertainty of war is something that penetrates deep into life and it is something that affects every facet of every day. Justice is the pursuit of right, the elevation of goodness, and the elimination of evil; however, such lucid definitions often lack substance when stood up to the tests of reality. Injustice is the denial of rights and the lack of morality for the embracement of barbarism. When looking for injustices in the world, what most readily comes to mind are violent crimes? Murder, theft, and rape are domestic injustices commonly recognized, but injustices, like reality, exist in perception. Therefore, to deem someone or something unjust, first agreement upon its definition must be established. When the United States declared her independence, we perceived the unjust indignities to be clear; however, to the militant king, the refusal to pay his taxes was injustice and the nullification of his law was the warrant for war. When such implied meanings come in to play, one has to determine what is just. In order to eliminate war, first all nations must outline the true meaning of “injustice” and find suitable solutions for reparation. The most diligent participant of war is the injustice done upon both sides, the backing of both by god, and the misconception that both will prevail due to their side being right and just. These differing views of injustice and justice are what cause the eventual degradation of war. (JRSOT) Tim O’Brien takes account of the injustices of war when he refers to opposing…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    EXPOSITION The justification of war — both in terms of jus in bello and jus ad bellum — is a difficult and complex task. This difficulty is increased immensely when trying to apply just war principles to terrorism, a complicated mix of typical and unconventional tactics that can be performed by both established and state governments. In the essay, I will critically address the discussion of terrorism by Michael Walzer in chapter 12 of “Just and Unjust Wars” (1977) and advocate for the justification of revolutionary terrorism. Walzer’s judgment of terrorism oversimplifies and neglects important complexities that must be considered in the ethical analysis of terrorism.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dueling in France

    • 934 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first part, The sixteenth Century: Early Stages of the French Duel is an ineffective part of the book. It is separated into five chapters that define and describe the duel, and tries to examine its origin in France, and to establish its importance to France in particular among western European nations. It concludes with Jarnac’s Duel 1547, that has significant importance to dueling in France.…

    • 934 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rebellion against the tyrant Harkin’s brutal regime has come to an end. The rebels and I had won the war after six long and bloody years. But at what cost did it charge us? Tens of thousands of our people either lay dead or wounded, hundreds of thousands more are homeless, entire cities have been destroyed in the process, and large amounts of farmland were rendered infertile by the rivers of the blood that were shed. I had personally lost my entire family to that man’s insatiable madness and bloodlust.…

    • 2012 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of war brings up many questions about life and death, suffering, and consequences. While many people may see war as something that affects people as a whole, such as nations or a persecuted group, war further impacts every individual, whether or not they are directly involved. War limits freedoms and individualism, and in most cases people find themselves with less rights than during peacetime. People base their choices not on what they feel, and more on what they have to do to survive. Soldiers and civilians alike are influenced by war in different ways, however, these tie together when the overall effects of war are examined.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Info

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Centralized authority | Napoleon seized power when there was no government | Contempt for mankind | Major reason for Napoleon's defeat |…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A review of chapter 2, 'The Crime of War' in Michael Walzer's book, "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    War is a very controversial topic for many people. Depending on the person’s outlook on the war, it can be depicted as something good or bad. War brings destruction wherever it goes, whether it is on a place or the people, and it ultimately is inevitable. War also protects a country from having further destruction and keeps the people at home safe from any danger. As a person can see in many recordings of war, there are many comparisons and contrasts that are expressed through soldiers, veterans, and civilians. Some comparisons seen in many of the testimonies given by effected people are dehumanization, dislocation, and alienation; but they also have contrasts that can be seen through nationalism, technological advancements, and the coming home for many…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reprisalzer's Analysis

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He believes that the the evidence surrounding the reasoning for the reprisals are not convincing. Christopher argues that “reprisals tend to lead to counterreprisals and an eventual denegation of all restraints in the conduct of war” (p. 175)…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is both brutal and brutalising, its dehumanising influence can bee seen in the way which the Vietnamese are described as ‘gooks’ or ‘dinks’. Louis E. Willet reflects on a battle, after which ‘a lot of guys did asshole things and didn’t think anything of it at the time – then later on realised it’. After the battles is when they get the time to reflect, then feel a great sense of guilt for their actions, some of which will haunt and damage them for the rest of their lives.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schroeder, P. W. ‘World War I as a Galloping Gertie,’ Journal of Modern History 44/3 (1972)…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    strict neutrality between the two potential combatants, a position that favored, of course, the larger and - at that moment in history - the more belligerent of them (p.163)…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays