Preview

War Powers Act Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
387 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War Powers Act Research Paper
The President of the United States is a very important and strong leader that does not have the right to officially go to war without the approval of Congress. This law is dubbed the War Powers Act since it states that the President has to notify Congress when sending troops to hostilities and if in a state of emergency, 42 hours after (SAS Institute Inc). Presidents in the past, like President Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, have argued that by enforcing the War Powers Act, Congress is taking away constitutional authorities that have been exercised for many years. On the other hand, people, such as George Mason, claim that giving the power to declare war to one singular person is a very untrustworthy situation (SAS Institute Inc). This argument
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    President Powers Are Too Big
    • 2425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    President Powers Are Too Big

    In the United States our President has many powers that are granted to him when they are elected into office. They have the ability to change the budget, to either cut back on spending, or implement new programs to help their citizens. They can veto a bill that they think is not ready to be made law yet and send it back to congress for further evaluation. They can appoint Supreme Court Justices. They also are the Commander in Chief of all U.S. armies, and they even have the power to send troops over to foreign nations in times of hostility in some circumstances. There are many who believe that the powers of the president are sometimes abused, especially as the Commander in Chief. There have been several instances in our Nation’s history in which the President has been able to wiggle their way around the constitutional limitations that are given of the Commander in Chief. Even though the president is unable to actually declare war he can use his powers to advance a conflict. The article Congressional War Powers, The Commander in Chief and Senator John Mccain describes how this is achieved by stating “Technically only congress has the power to declare war but the President can act unilaterally to repel sudden attacks made on U.S. Soil” (Bowling, 2008, p. 1). Presidents use these executive powers to engage in a conflict that they believe needs to be settled in times of crisis. The Constitution has a system within-it that tries to grant separate but equal powers to all branches of government called checks and balances. Although this system of checks and balances is supposed to be followed, there are ways which certain branches of government can gain more power than others. Often the President is the one who abuses the system, and uses their executive powers for their own advantages. These powers granted to the President have been abused more and more throughout our Nation’s recent history and it needs to…

    • 2425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Ways the executive branch of the U.S. goverment, through various laws and acts, gained power over the legislative and judicial brances.
    • 1723 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ways the executive branch of the U.S. goverment, through various laws and acts, gained power over the legislative and judicial brances.

    The president holds the most authority as commander in chief than in any other role. While the Congress has the sole power to declare war, the president can send armed forces into a country in situations that are the equivalent of war. Numerous presidents in the history of America have exercised…

    • 1723 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Power on the Presidents
    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Power on the Presidents

    John C. Yoo’s view he believes that the President of the United States does have unilateral power during war. He argues that in a speedy action the President does have the power to declare war. In the Constitution Article 2, Section 2 states that the “ President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and or the Militia of the Several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.” The President has powers from the broad constitutional authority to use military force to a threat of the United States being in danger. There can be a Militia sent to an area by the President, but he can’t make the decision to declare. Congress can declare war not the President. It states in the constitution that congress in foreign affairs that congress can say yes or no. The President, who is Commander in Chief, does have the power to declare war. For example on September 11th, 2001 the president was able to declare war on Iraq because they attacked the United States putting citizens in danger. John C. Yoo view is really that the President has the power to declare war depending on the situation.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War Powers Frq
    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    War Powers Frq

    The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying military personnel into hostile areas. This prevents the President from causing a random war without the awareness and approval of Congress. It protects the nation from an overly powerful/controlling President.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    War Measures Act
    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War Measures Act

    With great power comes great responsibility; that famous quote from Spiderman perfectly describes the war measures act. The war measures act was created in 1914 and gave the government the full power to do anything in order to maintain peace and safety for all Canadian citizens. It was only used three times in Canadian history before it was replaced by the Emergences act in 1988. It was invoked during World War I from 1914-1920, World War II from 1941-1945 and once again during the October crisis in 1970. The question is was the war measures act necessary, or was the Canadian government over reacting over nothing? Still after 40 years since the war measures act was used Canadians and the world are debating on the answer to that question. The war measures act is very controversial because it gave the government in charge the power to remove rights form citizens. Although removing citizen’s rights is wrong the war measures act was 100% necessary and it did its job by keeping Canada safe during the hard times of war/ terrorism. Throughout this essay it will explain how the war measures act protected Canada, strengthened Canada as a nation and saved millions of lives. The war measures act protected Canada and should be given the proper respects it deserves.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    There are no effective checks on presidential power
    • 963 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are no effective checks on presidential power

    Presidential powers are laid out in article II of the constitution, these include a range of formal power such as the power to propose legislation, submit the annual budget, sign legislation, veto legislation, act as chief executive, nominate federal judges and several others. There are also a range of informal powers that have progressively increased in power such as the ability for Presidents to issue executive orders. Although the founding fathers intended to create a government that had a system of checks and balances to prevent tyranny, the effectiveness of these checks in place may not have been as authoritative as intended as the President has ways of getting around the checks in place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    War Measures Act
    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages

    War Measures Act

    "The measure of a country's greatness is its ability to retain compassion in times of crisis." (Marshall, 1970). Pierre Trudeau took a forceful stand against Québec nationalists because he disliked the idea of separatism. On October 1970, the FLQ kidnapped British diplomat James Cross, for the release of FLQ members serving prison sentences. (Pearson Canada Inc., 2016). Québec Premier Robert Bourassa agreed to most of the demands but refused to release and FLQ prisoners. Québec Labour Minister Pierre LaPorte was then kidnapped by the FLQ members. Trudeau took drastic action and imposed the War Measures Act. The FLQ became an illegal act and separatist Québécois were arrested and held without charge. After all the rights legislation that had…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hosse Comitatus Act Research Paper
    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hosse Comitatus Act Research Paper

    A natural disaster places an immense amount of strain on our civilian population as well as the political leaders who are responsible for their state’s overall well-being. Hurricane Katrina was a perfect example of how bad a natural disaster can affect a single state. Louisiana was in a state of emergency and the state elected officials held all the power to assist in the palm of their hands. At the time of this state’s crises, Governor Kathleen Blanco was charged with this responsibility. Each state’s governor has the authority to enact Posse Comitatus. Whenever they feel that their state is in an unruly state and Marshall Law is needed. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 outlines the right of states, which can affect the wellbeing of citizens.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Executive Privilege
    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Executive Privilege

    In the past, the power of executive privilege has been used by Presidents to conceal information that has to do with foreign affairs and negotiations, military, national security issues as well as deliberations and policy making that is done between the President and his top aides. This power is only used when Congress asks the President or one of his top aides to produce all of the information pertaining to an event or situation. If the President then feels that parts of this information needs to be kept secret to protect the best interest of the public, or the other issues listed previously, then he will use executive privilege in order to not give that information to Congress. A huge part of executive privilege is to protect the deliberations and advice given by the President’s aides. When the President’s advisors give him advice, they need to be able to give him the best advice possible and if there is a chance that everything they said could be made public. For instance if the President and advisors are discussing what needs to be done in relation to a foreign power and one suggests to nuke them, one suggests a covert attack and one suggests a peaceful resolution. If the final decision is a peaceful resolution, and Congress asks for all of the information on the subject, then the President should use executive privilege to keep those other possible outcomes from going public, both to keep the public from getting out of control or uneasy and to keep the other country from finding out the other options and retaliating. This power ensures that the President’s advisors can be completely honest and say what needs to be said without being worried about their words being taken the wrong way or too harsh or hurt their image.…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War Powers Resolution Analysis
    • 88 Words
    • 1 Page

    War Powers Resolution Analysis

    My initial reaction would be to side with Congress. The War Powers Resolution allows the president to engage in an act of war without the consent of congress only in the case of an attack on the United States, or by “statutory authorization”. Based on this, the legislative branch seems to be in the right in this situation. I would ask the president questions pertaining to the goals of the US forces in the region, and questions to Congress such as to their opposition to the presidents actions.…

    • 88 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Power of the United States Presidency.
    • 633 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Power of the United States Presidency.

    Richard Neustadt states that the president's power is actually his influence in his essay, "Presidential Power". He wrote that the president gets many demands from many people from different groups and that he has a responsibility to listen and try to comply with those demands. But even with all these demands, the president is not guaranteed or even assured that people will agree with him or support him. This weakens his power because he can not put the pressure Congress to get the things he wants done because if the public isn't behind him then…

    • 633 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Congress In Foreign Policymaking
    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Role Of Congress In Foreign Policymaking

    They support president’s decision most of the time but make extensive modification. Throughout the years, there has been a source of tension over foreign policy between Congress and the President. The source of tension is over issues such as foreign aid, human rights, trade, sanctions and declaration of war. In 1973, the Congress passed the WPA which is known as War Powers Resolution overriding President Richard Nixon’s veto amid backlash against the United State involvement in Vietnam. Under this law, the Congress requires the president to consult with them before sending only of the United State troops into hostile situations. They must report commitment of United State forces with the twenty four hour time frame. The president needs to end military action within sixty days if Congress doesn’t declare war or authorize the use of force. The president has the authority to negotiate treaties but it only goes into effect unless after the Congress ratifies it. The Congress has asserted a role in foreign policymaking by creating the War Powers…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess the Constraints on the President’s Role as Commander-in-Chief.
    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the Constraints on the President’s Role as Commander-in-Chief.

    Article II of the United States Constitution gives the president the role of ‘Commander-in-Chief’ of the US’s Armed Forces, and this role provides the basis for rapid and effective decision-making, whilst maintaining the credibility of the USA’s foreign policy on the world stage. However, there are certain constraints on the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief’. One constraint on this power is that only Congress has the power to declare war. Congress can also authorise the president to deploy his country’s armed forces. Since the Constitution was created, Congress has only declared war a total of five times (in both World Wars, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, and the Spanish-American War), and this power has not been used since 1941. These authorisations are ordered by the President however, showing just how interlinked the powers of the president and Congress really are. One example of when the timing of a congressional authorisation can be crucial is the vote on action against Iraq, a few months before the 2002 midterm elections. This congressional authorisation was manipulated by George W Bush, and shows that the president can take advantage of this and make a decision with a Congress that has a majority of his party as members, rather than waiting until after a midterm when he might not be so sure as to have a key decision go his way. The relationship between Congress and the president was confirmed by the War Powers Act of 1973, passed in the aftermath of the Vietnam War.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1973 War Powers Act
    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1973 War Powers Act

    1. If no judicial court of authority, namely the United States Supreme Court, has stricken the 1973 War Powers Act and declared it null and void constitutionally, how is it that the authors of the text book are able to conclude Congress has few, if any, war powers remaining? How can this be? The law is the law, is it not? (Specifically, explain the political phenomenon that has occurred here and has similarly occurred in other legal and constitutional matters allowing the law to be ignored.)…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    President of the United States
    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    President of the United States

    The President of the United States, the chief executive officer of the federal government, the leader of the executive branch, and the commander in chief of the armed forces has certain constitutional powers. How much power does he really have? Does he have too much? Does he have too little, or not enough? In my opinion, I believe that the President of the United States of America has just enough power to run our country, deal with foreign and domestic policies, and fight the War on Terror In this essay, I will discuss my opinion, what the president’s powers are under the Constitution, and whether or not the president’s role has expanded beyond these powers in domestic and foreign policy.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More