Wall On The Border

Topics: United States, Firearm, Gun politics in the United States, Gun politics, Immigration to the United States, Law / Pages: 4 (905 words) / Published: Apr 18th, 2016
There is a debate in America about how to stop illegal immigration into the country. Many people think that the United States should build a wall on the border with Mexico to prevent illegals from coming into the U.S. Many other people think that a wall is the wrong thing to do, and there are other ways of stopping illegals immigration. The United States should not build a wall on the border. This is because it will not fix the problem and is not logistically implausible.
To begin with, Lou (2013), in his article provided reasons why he believes that a fence on the U.S and Mexico border would not prevent illegals from coming to the U.S. He believes that the fence is not in any way a solution to the illegal emigrant menace. He acknowledges the
…show more content…
He believes that these individuals would not easily give up their land for the purpose of building a wall on the border. In addition, Lou (2013) believes that the idea that a fence will prevent illegal immigrants is myopic. In illustration, he says that more than 40-percent of the illegal immigrants in the U.S are there because of overstayed visas that they possess. These kinds of people never crossed the southern border and in this regards, a fence would have no impact on these illegal immigrants. Finally, he concludes by informing us of his proposed legislation that will for the first time make it a criminal offence to stay in the U.S with an expired visa. Moreover, the legislation will provide it that the Secretary of Homeland Security will be required to submit to the Congress a plan detailing a biometric exit program involving the taking of fingerprints of all leaving the country through either the land, sea and air ports. With this, Lou concludes that almost half of the illegal immigrants shall be well taken care …show more content…
Moreover, the wall would antagonize Mexico leading to diplomatic rows. In addition, conservatives argue that building a wall is too extreme a reaction to the illegal immigration. Secondly, the building of a wall is not logistically implausible. As Lou noted that huge chunks of land of the Mexican border on the American side is held by private land owners, it would difficult for the government to take such lands. This is because of the logistic challenges such as compensation and even legal battles as these conservatives would not easily give their land. The cost of constructing the wall would also over burden the U.S tax payers as it would cost billions of dollars which is not worth its course.
Again, effective enforcement of the U.S borders involves a multi-faced approach that needs to take advantage of technology. For instance, it would be better and more effective to use manned and unmanned aircraft in conjunction with cameras and sensors to combat illegal immigration. In addition, the U.S can increase the border patrol personnel so as to curb the illegal emigrants. Lastly, the enactment of laws through such acts and legislations as the one proposed by Lou will go a long way in curbing illegal immigration as compared to the construction of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Border Wall
  • Border Walls
  • Essay On Border Wall
  • Border Wall Essay
  • USA-Mexico Border Wall
  • John Oliver: Border Wall
  • Border Wall Research Paper
  • How To Build A Border Wall
  • An Analysis Of Trump's Border Wall
  • Pros And Cons Of Building The US And Mexico Border Wall