It appears that Harry Parr, knowing Vyse’s penchant for modelling fauns and animals, he could not resist having a jibe at ‘pompous Vyse,’ especially at the Royal Academy, and as he remarked to his son Malcom, ‘I’m not done with debunking Vyse’. From his studio adjacent to Vyse, he sent in two exhibits to the RA. A promotional photo-card, dated 1927, illustrates one of Parr’s exhibits, a pottery group titled Chanticleer (RA1572). The subject is a handsome boy mounted on a speckled cockerel (Fig. 79). The 1928 coloured photograph shows a cockerel decorated in blues and lavender. From this evidence, one can assume that Parr made at least two different coloured versions of Chanticleer. The composition is a variation of Parr’s figure
It appears that Harry Parr, knowing Vyse’s penchant for modelling fauns and animals, he could not resist having a jibe at ‘pompous Vyse,’ especially at the Royal Academy, and as he remarked to his son Malcom, ‘I’m not done with debunking Vyse’. From his studio adjacent to Vyse, he sent in two exhibits to the RA. A promotional photo-card, dated 1927, illustrates one of Parr’s exhibits, a pottery group titled Chanticleer (RA1572). The subject is a handsome boy mounted on a speckled cockerel (Fig. 79). The 1928 coloured photograph shows a cockerel decorated in blues and lavender. From this evidence, one can assume that Parr made at least two different coloured versions of Chanticleer. The composition is a variation of Parr’s figure