Voluntary Active Euthanasia
Voluntary Active Euthanasia
Carlene Lawrence
Hodges University
PHI 3601 OL3
November 19, 2012
Abstract
This paper will discuss the benefits of the legalization of Voluntary Active Euthanasia (VAE). It will define the differences between Active Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide, as well as the difference between active and passive. We will look at VAE from a legal perspective, with discussion about specific court cases that have set precedence in this matter. We will also look at it from a moral point of view; from a perspective of Utilitarian and Subjectivist principles, to show that VAE should be considered morally correct.
Voluntary Active Euthanasia
This paper will discuss the benefits of Active Voluntary Euthanasia (VAE). Although it is sometimes referred to as mercy killings, it is one of the most controversial topics in our world today. Many believe the right to live is one of the most important human rights. The right to die should be equally as important.
First, we must discuss the difference between active and passive euthanasia. Active is the process by which a person is given something, such as a prescribed medication, to end their life, while passive is allowing a person to die naturally, not being given anything to help sustain their life.
Second, we must not confuse VAE with Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS), as the two are quite different. With VAE, it is the doctor who administers life ending medications, with the patient’s permission, while with PAS, the patient is the one who ultimately ends their own life.
It can be argued that there is no moral difference between active and passive, since the consequences, intentions, and actions are primarily the same. If medical treatment is withheld, allowing them to die naturally, this will prolong their pain and suffering, as well as that of their loved ones left to bear witness. It will also lead to large medical bills, which the families will be left to deal with.
Carlene Lawrence
Hodges University
PHI 3601 OL3
November 19, 2012
Abstract
This paper will discuss the benefits of the legalization of Voluntary Active Euthanasia (VAE). It will define the differences between Active Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide, as well as the difference between active and passive. We will look at VAE from a legal perspective, with discussion about specific court cases that have set precedence in this matter. We will also look at it from a moral point of view; from a perspective of Utilitarian and Subjectivist principles, to show that VAE should be considered morally correct.
Voluntary Active Euthanasia
This paper will discuss the benefits of Active Voluntary Euthanasia (VAE). Although it is sometimes referred to as mercy killings, it is one of the most controversial topics in our world today. Many believe the right to live is one of the most important human rights. The right to die should be equally as important.
First, we must discuss the difference between active and passive euthanasia. Active is the process by which a person is given something, such as a prescribed medication, to end their life, while passive is allowing a person to die naturally, not being given anything to help sustain their life.
Second, we must not confuse VAE with Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS), as the two are quite different. With VAE, it is the doctor who administers life ending medications, with the patient’s permission, while with PAS, the patient is the one who ultimately ends their own life.
It can be argued that there is no moral difference between active and passive, since the consequences, intentions, and actions are primarily the same. If medical treatment is withheld, allowing them to die naturally, this will prolong their pain and suffering, as well as that of their loved ones left to bear witness. It will also lead to large medical bills, which the families will be left to deal with.
References: Abdulkadir, A. B., Ansari, A. H., & Sambo, A. O. (2012). The right to die via euthanasia: an expository study of the shari 'ah and laws in selected jurisdictions. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 673+ Barcalow, E Daniel, P. S. (2011). Speaking of the value of life. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 21(2), 181-199,6. Euthanasia (a) in Merriam-webster online dictionary Friend, Mary Louanne,M.N., R.N. (2011). Physician-assisted suicide: Death with dignity? Journal of Nursing Law, 14(3), 110-116. Doi Rothstein, B.R Mary, L. F. (2011). Physician-assisted suicide: Death with dignity? Journal of Nursing Law, 14(3), 110-116. doi/913146489 Quinlan, J., & Radimer, F Rachels, J. (1975) Active and passive euthanasia . The New England Journal of Medicine 292 78-80 Rachels, J Steinbock, B., & Norcross, A. (1994). Killing and letting die. Fordham Univ Pr.