This type of argument is not a new topic recently discussed; in fact, history clearly shows us scenarios concerning totalitarian rule, from beginning to the results of overthrowing. Leaders who do not express the public’s individual rights should automatically or eventually be overthrown for a new representative that will fulfill the public’s demands. Looking at a past example that fits this discussion, not too long ago, Soviet Russia during 1929 to 1953 was once ruled by a man named Joseph Stalin. He believed everything, meaning the public and/or civilians, should carry out any order he wishes or wants to be accomplished; checking every box that leads to totalitarian rule. Unlike many other examples that represent a totalitarian society, he used terror and fear, which might have been the only reason why it took so long for the public to come to their senses and rebel against the opposing factor. While looking at Soviet Russia as an example, we can compare this to the movie “V for Vendetta”, also representing a totalitarian rule, but instead of the public realizing the government’s style of rule is absurd, they needed an important factor named “V’ to assist in reaching their desired goal. Instead of using fear and terror, he simply took over the main television station and gave his…