Top-Rated Free Essay

Virtue and Ambition in Julius Caesar

Better Essays
ENG3500
Shakespeare
Essay Assignment 1: Julius Caesar –language, character, theme

Virtue and Ambition in Julius Caesar

Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is a play which displays the contrasting themes of ambition and virtue. The background of this renowned play is set in republican Rome, where the importance of virtue is at its peak. Virtue embraces honour, nobility, love and responsibility for their nation. The Romans believe that truly virtuous men are consistent in their private and public political life. Ambition, on the other hand, has no place in Romans’ virtues. In the play, when Caesar begins to display signs of power-hungry, arrogance, increasing ambition and even the idea of tyranny, which clashes with the Roman republican virtues, the tension is built. While Shakespeare shares his definition of virtue through Brutus, as a role model of republican virtue, he creates the tension in the story as Brutus conflicts with ambitious characters like Caesar, Cassius and Mark Antony. Shakespeare begs to question whether virtue or ambition makes a successful leader. In the following essay, I shall discuss the contrasting themes of virtue and ambition in the play. At the play’s end, Antony concluded Brutus’s life honoring him as “the noblest Roman of them all”. Brutus stands firm on his set of virtuous principles. Throughout the play, he struggles to maintain Rome as an idealistic republic. He makes all his decisions only based on what is best for his nation, striving to put aside all personal emotions and desires. Yet, every time he takes the virtuous path which he believes in, he ironically hurts the very idea he seeks to protect. We are put in doubts, of why such constant principles and true virtue can go wrong. Making use of Brutus’s nature, Cassius easily convinces him Caesar’s ambitious nature as a great threat to the republic and must be assassinated. Cassius manipulates his “honorable mettle may be wrought From that it is disposed”, tactfully planting the seeds of Caesar’s ambition and tyranny in his mind, along with a forged letter from the plebeians to Brutus complaining of Caesar. Brutus enters into an internal conflict as to the nobility of this conspiracy and murder, and eventually comes to a conclusion that he is a “purger”, sacrificing for his nation, which is in line with his virtuous nature. Even among the conspirators, conflict between virtue and ambition is obvious. Besides Brutus, the conspirators plan to murder Caesar derives from selfish desires, envy and ambition. Antony’s speech about Brutus that “He only in a general honest thought And common good to all made one of them”, draws a line between Brutus’s virtue and others’ ambition. Clearly, Metellus desires power to free his brother, and Cassius is jealous of and ambitious like Caesar. In his conversation with Brutus, he considers himself better than Caesar as he challenges that “A man of such feeble temper should So get the start of the majestic world, And bear the palm alone.” He continues to show his jealously by comparing Caesar with Colossus, where “we petty men Walk under his huge legs and peep about To find ourselves dishonorable graves” Finally, Brutus is unhappy about Cassius as he discovers that Cassius and others have been involved in bribery to gain money, further drawing a line between virtue and personal desires and ambition. Again, ambition and virtue clashes in the play upon the glory Caesar has ascended upon. As soon as Caesar was introduced in the play, we hear from Cassius that he started to behave like a god. Even when he makes his appearance, Calphurnia and Antony addresses him as “my lord”. Caesar continues to display various signs of increasing ambition and arrogance, such as Casca’s amusing account of Caesar’s thrice refusal to the crown when it was obvious he wanted to accept it. His ambition and arrogance is at its peak in the play as he states that he is “constant as the Northern Star, Of whose true fixed and resting quality There is no fellow in the firmament.” It is evident that he sees himself the greatest of all Romans and intends to rule the nation.
With his Roman principles and virtues, Brutus is against such ambition. He believes that murder and death is the only way to deal with it. As soon as Caesar dies, he rejoices “Ambition’s debt is paid”, and he convinces the pubic that even though he loved Caesar, “But as [Caesar] was ambitious, I slew him”. It is ironic as he tries hard to prevent any possibility of ambition in growing into tyranny, yet in the end, the Roman republic is destroyed in his hands, when virtue clashes with ambition. Claiming that killing Antony is “Like wrath in death and envy afterwards”, Brutus strives to remain the most noble and virtuous man by separating the death of Caesar from a dishonorable violent deed. In his opinion, murder was righteous and virtuous upon his speech, “Let’s be sacrificers, but not butchers” to his fellow conspirators. Even after Caesar’s death, he continues to be motivated by his virtue that Antony would sympathize with him, which is proven to be a naïve mistake. Anthony on the other hand, is power-hungry and ambitious, making use of the opportunity of Caesar’s death to rise into power. Antony manipulates the crowd shrewdly by his rhetorical speech which questions the ‘ambitious’ nature of Caesar which has no true evidence. He moves and triggers a riotous crowd, and thus leads to revolution and bloodshed, where Rome will never be the same again, and he could rise in power to rule. As we compare Brutus’s speech in the square with Antony’s, we see that Brutus displays true virtue and only true love for his nation and people. Though, he can win some support of the plebeians, the true meaning behind his actions and his virtuous principles, which is to preserve Rome as a republic, is totally lost. It is ironic as the public respond by glorifying “Caesar’s better parts Shall be crowned in Brutus”, which is exactly opposite to what Brutus hopes to see. While virtue is honoured and promoted in the society, Shakespeare questions the practicality of such virtue in reality of a government or head of nation. To conclude, it is important to recognize that Brutus is doomed to die from the start as he continues to uphold his principles and virtues. As the perfect exemplar of a Roman, he made decisions by sacrificing and overcoming personal desires and emotions, only for the good of the nation. Yet, it is justified through the play through his actions that virtue does not make a good political leader, because it is too idealistic and neglects the emergence of ambition, which is the motivation and driving force of political leaders throughout history.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ambition In Julius Caesar

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    protect their people and have ambition towards honor. However, history has not been perfect in that sense; Leaders such as Julius Caesar and Adolf Hitler have consumed power and hurt others for their own benefits. Hitler wanting adulation and honor had to force this way into the minds of his people. Caesar wanting an empire and all the power from the Senate had to defeat Pompey to become the only ruler of Rome. Did both Hitler and Caesar abuse power to fulfill their ambition and gain honor? Their uses…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Without ambition one starts nothing. Without work one finishes nothing”- Ralph Waldo Emerson. Oftentimes, people set goals for themselves to accomplish. This goals creates great desire and ambition which fuels all actions. However, when the ambition in question becomes the individual’s sole focus, the outcomes can be negative, both for the individual, as well as for surrounding parties. The excessive ambition and desire of characters in William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, led to their downfall…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For some people, there is a call to rise. An ambition—a competition—is planted in them, and they dream of influence. These are the people who become rulers, who lead the way of nations, who bend circumstance under their will. Julius Caesar certainly is an example: his presumption towards bravery holds the nation beneath his grip. He fears no bad omens, and even signs of death do not scare him. He tells his wife just hours before his assassination: “Cowards die many times before their deaths; The…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mrs.Bartnik ENG1D1 3 June 2014 The Disastrous Affects of Ambitious Men Ambition is a powerful characteristic. However, it is the way an individual chooses to use this characteristic that may unfavorably alter the end result. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, ambition is truly taken to its full potential with the help of several characters and their desire for power and control. Julius Caesar, hungry for almighty rule, will do absolutely anything to achieve his goal. Also, Mark…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare explores the idea that ambitions can change a person’s character so that they no longer seek the good of all men and even friends, but rather seek for more power for himself. A first scene that depicts ambition is the feast of Lupercal; the people were celebrating because Julius Caesar came back to Rome with triumph after defeating Pompey in a civil war in Egypt, and now he has the advantage to become King. A pair of commoners who are celebrating…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    didactic explanation of the political struggles of Renaissance Italy. Similarly, William Shakespeare’s play, “Julius Caesar,” composed in 1599, depicts the historical events surrounding Julius Caesar’s assassination. The ideas of manipulation and fate versus free will are presented through literary devices in “The Prince” and dramatised staging features in Shakespeare’s play. While virtue is presented as a key theme in both texts, its portrayal differs due to the context in which it was set or written…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Ambition vs Honor” Adolf Hitler and Julius Caesar were both powerful men that were ambitious. Hitler created the third Reich in Germany. Hitler also had this idea of a perfect race. He killed many Jews without blonde hair and blue eyes. Caesar was the dictator of Roman Empire, and he never lost a war while he was in command. He played a critical role in forming the Roman Empire. Hitler and Caesar were both ambitious men. To be ambitious is having or showing a strong desire and determination to…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Virtues In Rome during them time of Julius Caesar, a persons uprightness was measured by how well he/she conformed to four basic virtues. Virtue- conformity to moral and ethical principals; moral excellence. The four Roman Virtues Pietas- duty, or dutiful conduct towards his parents, relatives, ancestors, Gods, and country. Gravitas- "Gravity" — A sense of the importance of the matter at hand, responsibility and earnestness. Gravitas is the most important of the Roman virtues because…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it is in our laws to to punish death with death, perhaps this should not be the penalty in this case. Caesar was not the perfect Senator, nor the perfect leader. His sin was that he subverted our laws. He was putting the power and influence of this body in trouble. Perhaps, it can be said that he was too powerful for his own good. Caesar could have been dictator for life. Was this what the Republic needed? He constantly undermined this Senate. When Bibulus was his co-consul, Bibulis was…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Honor over Ambition Throughout history the balance between honor and ambition has been tilted in one way or another. Someone’s ambition can get in the way of their honor and result in dishonorable actions and negative societal consequences. However sometimes a dishonorable act can be done for honorable reasons, for the greater good of society. This is the case in Marcus Brutus taking part in Julius Caesar’s murder, Oskar Schindler deceiving the Nazi, and Sir Nicholas Winton forging legal documents…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays