Preview

Vioxx Medication Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
830 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Vioxx Medication Case Study
Vioxx Medication (Rofecoxib) Vioxx (Rofecoxib) medication is a class of drug called nonsteroidal and inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Vioxx was introduced on May 20, 1999 by Merck & Co. It has been used by over 20 million Americans since it was put on the market. Vioxx works by reducing substances that cause inflammation, pain and fever in the body. Vioxx is used to reduce pain, inflammation, and stiffness cause by osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and certain forms of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Also vioxx is used to treat acute pain in adults, treat migraines, and menstrual pain. Vioxx was available on prescription in both tablets and as an oral suspension. At the hospitals it was also available in injection. Vioxx was prescribed worldwide to up to 80 million people at some time. Vioxx belongs to a class of …show more content…
However, several studies have questioned the cardiovascular safety of Vioxx. The manufacture of Vioxx has announced a voluntary withdrawal of the drug from the U.S. and worldwide market in September 30, 2004. After the company’s own 3 year study was stopped. Two million Americans were taking Vioxx when it was pulled and Merck had said that approximately 20 million people in the U.S. have used the drug. This withdrawal was due to some safety concerns of an increased risk of cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and strokes in patients taking Vioxx during the first 18 months. In the 5 years that Vioxx was on the market over 88,000 and 140,000 cases of heart disease were reported, of those cases 30 to 40 percent were fatal. The records indicate that the action of both Merck and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found nearly 30,000 excess cases of heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths that resulted from the use of this drug between 1999 and 2003. Over 300 lawsuits have been filed against Merck, and was expected that thousand more will

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Merck and Vioxx

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In May of 1999, the FDA approved the use of rofecoxib. Marketed under the name of Vioxx, rofecoxib was manufactured and distributed by Merck, a large pharmaceutical company. Doctors prescribed the drug as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and prescription painkiller. Five years after its release, rofecoxib was withdrawn because of a study that showed the drug more than doubled the risk of heart attack or stroke. Because of Merck’s ongoing and increasing knowledge of the dangerous effects of the drug while continuing to distribute rofecoxib, Merck should be held accountable for acting unethically.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question Case Cemex

    • 897 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What benefits have CEMEX and the other global competitors in cement derived from globalization? More broadly, how can cross-border activities add value in an industry as apparently localized as cement?…

    • 897 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brain Gym Analysis

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Drug companies distribute and promote their changed results in academic journals, tricking very nearly anybody into putting their dangerous and inaccurately tested drugs on the market. In duplicate publication if a drug company gets a better result, they will republish their findings in slightly different ways and in multiple academic sources. “One drug called ondansetron managed to overestimate the drug's effect by 23% using this method” (Goldacre, 2011, pp.164-165). Side effects usually happen and can often be severe. Harmful side effects and their negative results, when known, can discourage medicine buyers. Drug companies can muffle the negative reactions by contrasting them with horrible symptoms that another, comparative medication may have. According to drugwatch.com, one type 2 diabetes drug, Actos, which was prescribed 10 million times and FDA approved, increases the chance of bladder cancer by 40% and causes an increased risk of heart failure. Vioxx a painkiller that was approved in 1999 by the FDA was studied in a trial against an older drug, naproxen, to compare the different side effects much money was invested in the trial, and the pending…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medicine Werx Case Study

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    10 Trees Planted for Every Pair Sold – We use only the best wood from sustainably managed forests. We also partner with Trees for the Future to plant 10 trees for every pair of shades.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xanax Case Study Essay

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The consumption of Xanax amongst college students can be explained and understood by our campaign through the reasoned action model by Martin Fishbein and Issaz Ajzez. Linking beliefs of Xanax consumption without prescription for recreational use, to the overall planned behavior that will lead to consumption by making use of the information available to us. An individual’s attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control can ultimately lead to the rejection or acceptance of intention and our final behavior.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On April 03, 2013, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Oklahoma CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C agreed to pay eleven million dollars to settle ongoing civil penalty claims. The United States has alleged that from October 6, 2005 to October 5, 2011, CVS pharmacy retails stores in Oklahoma and other locations violated the The Controlled Substance Act (CSA) and the record keeping regulations. The Controlled Substance Act was passed by Congress to fight against illegal distribution and abuse of controlled substances including prescription drugs. Oklahoma created false DEA registration number of the prescribing practitioner on dispensing records, which are provided to state prescription drug monitoring programs. CVS also filled prescriptions for certain prescribers whose…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As consultant to Sanders and Myers, I would suggest they rethink the continuation of economic value added (“EVA”) bonus payout process. The proposed EVA bonus payout structure is supposed to be an objective way to gauge and reward employee performance; however, through no fault of their own, the Dermatology group is slated to undergo severe ebbs and flows in their incentive and could potentially wreak havoc on employee morale and retention.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cemex Case Study

    • 2720 Words
    • 11 Pages

    What benefits have CEMEX and the other global competitors in cement derived from globalization? More broadly, how can cross-border activities add value in an industry as apparently localized as cement?…

    • 2720 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    case of CEMEX

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. What benefits have CEMEX and the other global competitors in cement derived from globalization?…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cemex Case Study

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (A) shows a cost advantage to CEMEX due to a good global positioning satellites systems which decreases the costs for fuel, maintenance and payroll. Furthermore, CEMEX has a competitive advantage through its low hierarchy and their high standardized reports.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Merck and Vioxx

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to The New York Times article, “Merck to Pay $950 Million Over Vioxx” by Duff Wilson, the following lawsuits have been settled by Merck: Merck has agreed to pay $950 million and has pleaded guilty to a criminal charge over the marketing and sales of the painkiller Vioxx, the company and the Justice Department said Tuesday. Merck agreed to pay a $321 million criminal fine and plead guilty to one misdemeanor count of illegally introducing a drug into interstate commerce, the Justice Department said in a news release. The charge arose from Merck 's promotion of Vioxx to treat rheumatoid arthritis before the Food and Drug Administration approved it for that purpose in 2002. Merck also is paying $426 million to the federal government and $202 million to state Medicaid agencies. Those payments will settle civil claims that its illegal marketing caused doctors to prescribe and bill the government for Vioxx they otherwise would not have prescribed. In 2007, Merck agreed to pay $4.85 billion to settle 27,000 lawsuits by people who had claimed they or their relatives had suffered injury or death after taking the drug. Merck has also signed a corporate integrity agreement in connection with the settlement, promising to monitor future promotional activity and report back regularly to the government. Merck joins Pfizer and most other major drug companies in settling long investigations with prosecutors.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to explore the pros and cons of Suboxone and Suburex, two treatments for heroin dependence, which are both agonists and antagonists for opioids. The chosen articles, Ling,Walter, et al.’s, “a decade of research by the National Drug Abuse treatment clinical trials network”, Bell, James, et al.’s “a pilot study of bunprenorphine-naxolone combination tablet (Suboxone) in the treatment of opioids dependence” and Mc Cormick’s “management and post-marketing surveillance of CNS drugs”, bring up the benefits and the disadvantages of using Suboxone or Suburex for opioid addictions.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The actions Merck undertook when marketing Vioxx and emphasizing its safety even after finding out the product’s side effects endangered all its key stakeholders and showed the real face of the company that accented its highly ethical maxims. Cardiovascular side effects of the Vioxx increased the risk of complications that could have caused patient’s death, therefore Merck violated the basic right to life of all the Vioxx consumers. It was already mentioned that Vioxx caused 3468 deaths by heart attack and stroke. All these tragedy events could have been prevented if Merck provided adequate information about all the peculiarities of Vioxx. Even though Merck argued that the withdrawal of tests results was caused by its utilitarian intention…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study: Medimix

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I am selecting the product “MEDIMIX” which I have regularly consume. It is FMCG product.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vix Options

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Trading volatility is nothing new for option traders. Most option traders rely heavily on volatility information to choose their trades. For this reason, the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Volatility Index, more commonly known by its ticker symbol VIX, has been a popular trading tool for option and equity traders since its introduction in 1993. Until recently, traders used regular equity or index options to trade volatility, but many quickly realized that this was not the best method. On Feb. 24, 2006, the CBOE rolled out options on the VIX, giving investors a direct and effective way to use volatility. In this article, we take a look at the past performance of the VIX and discuss the advantages offered by the VIX options.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays