Violence In Lord Of The Flies Persuasive Essay

We, as an audience, love to see heroes win. We love stories where the underdog rises up and defeats the bigger, badder, opposition. Not only do the authors and creators love that we love their work, so do their wallets. Look at the Lord of the Ring series or the Harry Potter series, both are very popular and financially successful. It’s because people make what sells, and these stories sell. However, The Lord of the Flies does not have a clear victor at the end of the book, nor does it paint a clear, black-and-white story with a clear protagonist and antagonist; yet, it still enjoyed commercial and critical success. Golding wrote well and delivered an exciting book, and also challenged the reader by presenting them with something that is morally gray. Golding made the reader question themselves and question their own thought process, and that’s what made the book so good, in my opinion. Audiences need to see more challenging stories, that leave the reader or viewer questioning themselves, or stories that leave the audience feeling uncomfortable or sad.

Many books and films that are determined as “smart” by critics
All the characters had importance and it was a big deal when a character died because it was given meaning through symbols. However, in another violent book for teenagers, The Hunger Games, killing and violence just felt like another way to advance the plot. The violence didn’t have a lot of meaning to it, and didn’t add to the book. Violence shouldn’t be violence for the sake of violence, it should add something to the book or film, or it can say something about the audience. For example, Jack’s savage manhunt for Ralph involves burning down half the forest, and the smoke actually allows for the British Navy to find them. Things like these allow for more meaning in a book and film, and allow the audience to decide for themselves how they feel about