Preview

Vetting System

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1100 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Vetting System
In February 19, 1942 President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 which authorized the internment of of tens of thousands of Japanese American citizens. The constitutionality of which was questioned by every level of the courts. The federal and supreme courts involvement in cases such as Hirabayashi, Korematsu and ex parte Mitsuye Endo swayed and sometimes contradicted the constitution that birthed our nation. In our modern day, we are faced with a similar circumstance. Our 45th President, Donald J Trump campaigned on the promise of a travel ban that would halt the immigration of seven dominantly muslim countries for six months in order to form a proper vetting system for the refugees leaving the terrorism plagued sector …show more content…
Many people opposed Trump’s travel ban stating that none of the countries on the list proposed a threat to our national security. In many ways they are right. Trump claims that the countries on the list were responsible for 9/11. The original order also stated that green card holders and people with valid visas to work in the United States could not travel between our country and theirs until a more effective and efficient vetting system was put in place. In many ways, Trump is right. Our vetting system does take an extraordinarily long time and many immigrants find themselves waiting decades before their citizenship is granted. A more efficient system would prompt a quicker and easier entry to our country. However, constitutionally, you are not allowed to discriminate against any human regardless of religion, race or ethnicity. We can corroborate with the court cases like Korematsu’s that the detention or removal of a group of people from an entire country should never be allowed and that regardless of the war we are fighting. Citizens from those countries, unless under federal watch, should not have their rights infringed upon them due to scapegoating. Many great people from around the world come to work in the United States due to it’s endless opportunity and also many times because of the rights granted to each individual. A personal example is with my father. As a director at Google, he spends his time with people of every race, religion, sex for the majority of his day. Trump’s travel ban would prevent many people like the men and women my father works with from continuing to support their families, and would also prevent them from trying to build a life for themselves. In times of war, in many ways the President should take executive action to ensure the safety of our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Justice Owen J. Roberts saw the situation as a clear violation of Korematsu's Constitutional rights. Roberts was quoted as saying, “ . . .it is a case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States.” Roberts saw the discrimination in the way Executive Order 9066 was being carried out. Just as Adolph Hitler was funneling Jew into Concentration Camps in Germany, the United States was similarly doing the same thing to Japanese…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court's Decision - The Supreme Court upheld the order excluding persons of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast war zone during World War II. Three justices dissented. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court. He began with the observation that legal restrictions on the rights of a single racial group will always be “suspect” and that “courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny.” However, they are not necessarily unconstitutional. The exclusion order imposed hardships “upon a large group of American citizens. …But hardships are part of war….Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. But when under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger.” Justice Owen Roberts wrote in his dissent that this “is the case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on his ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States.” Justice Robert Jackson noted that comparable burdens were not imposed upon descendents of the other nationalities (German, Italian) with who the United States was also at war.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    1. The Supreme Court had to decide if the President and Congress overreached their war powers by restricting the rights of Japanese-Americans with Executive Order #9066 and Military Order #39.…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Korematsu V Us

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During World War II, shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt passed Executive Order 9066 which allowed the Secretary of War to declare certain areas as "military zones" and gave the military power over the attorney general. These newly declared military zones were made in the western US and were areas "from which any or all persons could be excluded". Although the document does not specify any races or ethnic groups, later orders issued that all people of Japanese decent (even American citizens) were excluded from these military zones that included all of California, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii. The Japanese in these areas were forced to evacuate to Internment Camps; where they could only bring what they could carry with them and where they would stay until further notice. Fred Korematsu was a Japanese-American citizen (American born) who decided to stay at his home in California during this time and was arrested for the violation of Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34. Korematsu challenged his arrest and the case was taken to the Supreme Court, where it was questioned if Executive Order 9066 violated Korematsu's 14th and 5th amendment rights (right to equal protection under the law and life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness). The court also questioned if Korematsu's constitutional rights were allowed to be violated due to the special circumstances of war. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court sided with the government by ruling that the government was permitted to deny the Japanese of their constitutional rights because of military considerations, and that such exclusion was not beyond the war powers of congress and the president since it was done with national security in mind. Almost 40 years later after serving his sentence, Korematsu brought his case back to court filing for a writ of Coram Nobis to correct the previous ruling and achieve justice. Korematsu won this…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Executive order gave military officials the power to limit the civil rights of Japanese Americans.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The TRO restricts the enforcement of President Trump's executive order widely known as the "Travel Ban" or "Muslim Ban". The executive order bans individuals from seven countries entry to the U.S.A. for 90 days, suspends the refugee program for 120 days and suspends Syrian refugees indefinitely. The order also states that exceptions may be made in some cases "when in the national interest". However, it does not provide any explanation as to what qualifies as being in the national interest, or who evaluates the cases. The order goes on to direct that when the refugee program resumes operation, refugees of certain religions would have prioritized applications. The government insisted that the bans were a matter of protecting the nation from terrorism. The bans were put into place immediately, causing a widespread and very controversial effect.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On january 27, trumps signed a executive order. This place national borders to be closed temporarily. This is mainly to keep out muslim immigrants from entering the country. This order also gives christian refugees preferential treatment.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on January 27, 2017. The order bans citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the US for at least 90 days. The order also suspended refugee admission program of the US for 120 days. US officials added that the order is only a first step toward a wider ban, which is aimed at protecting the US from terrorist attacks. The executive order is in line with President Trump’s campaign pledge. He promised a total and complete shutdown of Muslim immigration during his presidential campaign.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They set principles that we are all “separate but equal” to this newly founded land, but how true was that statement? Immigrants from Europe were welcomed with open arms, but what about those from China or Africa? They were put to work as slaves or into immigration camps. What example does this provide for the future generations to come? This showed that it had been okay to treat certain races as not equal to those of the European descend. The founding fathers believed that they had done good in welcoming many to come and own acres of land for no price, but not to every immigrant. This example has been seen not only throughout the history of America, but also to this current day. Many choose to harass those of a different race. With our newly elected president, we find it even more difficult to live in peace with one another. He sets a horrific example, not allowing immigrants of certain countries to be entered into the United States. He has personally stated those of Mexican descends, Muslims, and many other countries of the Middle East. He fears that they will cause harm when in reality it is those of the native country who have been terrorizing different races. This leader has been showing negative doings that will eventually harm not only those of a certain race, but also citizens in this country as…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due to many terrorist attack worldwide, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order banning 9 foreign countries from entering the United States. A majority of these countries are Muslim populated. We fear that we can not tell the difference between innocent immigrants coming to America for a better life and terrorist claiming that they too, are immigrants coming to America for a better life but in reality they want to destroy this beautiful nation.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The answer is yes and no. The Constitution grants that “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America” (pg. 47). This one sentence of the constitution has been disputed since as early as 1793. After over a century of dispute it is affirmed “That the president does possess “residual” or “resultant” powers over and above, or in the consequence of, his specifically granted powers to take temporary alleviative action in the presence of serious emergency.” (pg. 49). So now, what qualifies as an “emergency”? President Trump could feel that the threat of rapists from Mexico and terrorists from the Middle East is too great to ignore, thus its an emergency and he must act. In reality, Trump is authorized to build a wall and revive the pipelines going through Native Land. The thing he is not authorized to do, is ban people based on religion. The constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” (Amendment 1) thus Trump has directly contradicted the constitution, some will say that this is dictator-like behavior. But here's the thing, Congress can reverse it all, that is why this nation was built on checks and balances. While the President does not need the approval from congress to instate an executive order, “his powers may be augmented by congress”(pg. 50) if they feel the President has acted…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of these views are the deportation of foreign people. Trump is talking about deporting people and building a wall at the Mexican border, people are going out of their way to target foreign people with speech as well as violence. If this continues, people from other countries will not want to come to the United States anymore in fear of danger. Trump also talked about making security to get into the country stronger, while making security stronger you are also raising the price to travel abroad. Today more money is spent in the United States by international travelers than anywhere else in the world. The United States is known for being a melting pot of cultures, if that is taken away then why would anyone want to travel to the United States. Many people from other countries dream of traveling to the United States; they should be allowed to visit the United States the same as we are allowed to visit their countries. Charging people absurd prices to leave or enter the country will make tourism unfordable. Other countries may act and close off connections with the United States for example not let us into their countries or stop trading with us, some might also raise their prices to enter their countries which would stop tourism all together. The tourism sector would be nonexistent and many people would lose the ability to see family…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People would consider the Alien and Sedition Acts unconstitutional for a number of factors. First, the moment the president deports someone he considers dangerous without any physical evidence; he is violating the Article 5 of the Bill of rights, which states that “everyone is innocent until proven guilty.” Second, the president would be again infringing the Article 5 if someone was sent to prison without a proper trial since the article holds that “no one can be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” Finally, it would be unconstitutional according to the Article 8 of the Bill of Rights if someone had to pay unreasonable heavy fines. In conclusion, the United States…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Us Immigration Myth

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages

    61 million, that is the number of immigrants currently residing in the United States (Ziegler). For the past year, there has been a great deal of negativity surrounding incoming immigrants, recent immigrants, and immigration in general. These attitudes were made more prevalent when the newly elected president, Donald Trump, instituted an executive order to temporarily ban entrance to the United States to seven Muslim-majority countries (Trump). This ban was eventually lifted by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Liptak). Although in the United States there continues to be negative stigmas around immigration and allowing immigrants into the U.S., immigrants greatly benefit and contribute to the United States by improving the economy, creating…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays