Preview

Value of Human Life

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
307 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Value of Human Life
The value of human life has been challenged over many years. Some people feel as though human life is not valuable, while others feel it is extremely valuable. The worldview that a person holds, directly relates to the value that they place on human life. If someone believes in evolution, then they would seemingly believe that life is not valuable being that life stemmed from animals. On the other hand, a person whom believes is creationism is more likely to stand firm in the fact that the human life was created by God and is unique and special to Him. People with mental handicaps are still special and important to creationists because God made them. People who do not follow Christ or are evolutionists feel like abortion and the sterilization of mentally disabled people is no big deal because they do not value life as a Christian would. The Buck vs. Bell case in 1927 is a case that deals specifically with the sterilization of mentally disabled people. It legalized this act against the “feeble minded or socially inadequate” (Dorr). Officially speaking, the Supreme Court has never overruled this law. However, the act is being rebuked by many areas of the country. Creationists view this law as immoral because of the high value that they place on human life. God created the handicapped person for a reason so their life is as equally important as the next person’s. Evolutionists are more concerned with the quality of life that is lived by the person. So to them, they do not have a good life, so sterilizing them so they cannot produce offspring is the best thing for them. The difference of the value of life rests solely in which worldview they have.

Dorr, Gregory Michael. "Buck v. Bell (1927)." Encyclopedia Virginia. Virginia Foundation for the Humanities, 31 May. 2013. Web. 20 Aug. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assignment 2: Terry V. Ohio 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. ED. 2d 889, 1968 U.S.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jerry Alfred WHITWORTH, Defendant-Appellant.,…

    • 2825 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To obtain embryonic stem cells, some researchers fertilize an egg and sperm cell in a laboratory; after having grown for a few days, they destroy the embryo to extract the stem cells from the center of the embryo. Essentially, this creates a potential human being and destroys it. Creating human life only to destroy it is morally wrong because “just as an infant is a human being in the infant stage,” “a human embryo is a human in the embryonic stage.” (Amandito) This is not just a collection of human cells, but a stage in a person's life, which every human was once at. “If an embryo will later become a human being, then it should be given the respect of a human being.” (Amandito) Moreover, some researchers take embryonic stem cells from aborted fetuses and use their dead bodies to extract stem cells. Though this is still a human embryo, it is much more complex than a fertilized embryo. “An early embryo that has still not yet been implanted into the uterus does not have the psychological, emotional, or physical properties [of a grown human]” (Embryonic Stem) However, with aborted fetuses, they all have these properties. The average week for an abortion is 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, the fetus can breathe, has a heartbeat, and has measurable brain waves. Furthermore, the human fetus has fingers, toes, a nose, and all its appendages, resembling an adult human.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bluebook Citations

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Periodicals: Mary A. Jones, The Best of Trial Briefs, 28 Neb. L. Rev. 102 (2006).…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As soon as civilizations created constitutions, actions were being called unconstitutional by those who opposed them. In some instances, unconstitutional acts were the subject of revolution, regicide, or as happened in the American political system, the declaration of a Judiciary body. American judicial review can broadly be defined as the power of this such judicial branch of the government to determine whether or not the acts of all branches of the government and government official comply with the Constitution. It derives from the doctrine of "judicial supremacy", which in turn legitimises this definition by declaring that "both the letter and spirit of the Court's constitutional determinations bind all branches of government and government officials." (Siegel, Ely, McCloskey). Originating as far back as the late 1700's, this practice of judicial review, has allowed judges, thus, to maintain limited government and the rule of the people and to uphold the supremacy of the Constitution, by using the power allocated to them "to declare "null and void" any acts of the national government or of the states which they themselves deem contrary to the Constitution." (Irish and Prothro, 522). Thus, in effect the law becomes "what the judges say it is" (Irish and Prothro, 522).…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason many people choose to have an abortion is based on genetic abnormalities. Having genetic abnormalities does not make you less human. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 provides the civil rights protection needed for people born with disabilities to lead fulfilled lives. In this case there should be no reason to have an abortion due to genetic…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bradley (1995) believes that it is not unethical for a woman to abort a handicapped fetus because the woman would be responsible for raising the handicapped child. The theoretical "interests of the fetus," she feels, do not outweigh the real rights of the mother.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To start, pro-life advocates base their arguments off many factors, one being that babies are viable lives and have rights from the time of conception. As discussed earlier, the embryo, which is an organism in the earliest development stage, contains DNA in its chromosomes when it is concepted. By the fifth week of pregnancy, the embryo is rapidly growing and has now started to develop major organs, such as the heart and brain (Mayo Clinic Staff, par. 11). According to Baby Med, viability of pregnancy is based on the presence of a fetal heart beat, normally rising hCG levels, and the fact that the fetus is alive inside the womb. Baby Med also states that, typically, a hospital considers the 24th week of pregnancy to be the age of viability outside of the womb, though it is known for babies born younger than that to survive (“What Does …”, pars. 2-3). Despite the time mark that a baby can survive outside the womb, all unborn lives should be considered “viable” because as they age, the better chance they have at surviving outside the womb. Most unborn babies develop normally and will eventually develop into a healthy, viable child. Another key argument for the side of pro-life is the availability of alternative options for mothers pregnant with children they do not wish to raise. Adoption is a leading alternative for abortion. Adoption is a great option for mothers who do not want to raise their…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the hundred year argument of pro life vs pro choice there is one thing no one has even argued for. Everyone is trying to claw their way up to the top of the food chain. making the same arguments over and over again trying to seem as smart as possible without getting anything done. This is the stupidity of the American intellectual society. Before we even think about if it's right or wrong to force to be mothers to take a child into this cruel world or to save the child's individual genetic link to the rest of the human race. We need to first look at what we will do with the unwanted babies.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Monroe Doctrine is the name given to the foreign policy created by President James Monroe in 1823. This policy declared the entire western hemisphere off limits to European colonization. In return for compliance with this declaration, the United States promised to remain removed from European affairs and wars. This is an important doctrine because it shaped the…

    • 2499 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to look at this question Harris uses the example of women in I.V.F clinics who are considering embryo implantation. In this example Harris asks if it is morally wrong for a woman to pick the potential embryos that do not have a disabled genetic constitution. To support his argument of Eugenics Harris explains that if a woman does not choose the embryo with a disabled genetic constitution then she is saving a child from a physical or mental condition that could harm the child in the future. Harris wants to express that we all have a rational preference not to live a life where we have a disability. He sees…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Choice or Pro Life?

    • 1905 Words
    • 8 Pages

     Sanctioning abortion devalues life. Every premise used to justify the killing of an unborn child could also be used to justify the killing of individuals such as senile elderly persons or those who are psychologically impaired -- who some consider less than a person in the whole sense.…

    • 1905 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main argument pertaining to abortion is whether or not a fetus is a "person" that is "indistinguishable from the rest of us" and if it deserves rights equal to women's. On this question there is a tremendous spectrum of religious, philosophical, scientific, and medical opinion, but it all really depends on who you ask. It's been argued for centuries. Fortunately, our society has recognized that each woman must be able to make this decision, based on her own conscience. To impose a law defining a fetus as a "person," granting it rights equal to or superior to a woman's, thinking, feeling, conscious human being, is not only arrogant but absurd. It only serves to diminish a woman's value. (Heritage House 76, Inc.)Under the view of pro choice supporters the embryo is not a baby since it can not survive and live outside the uterus since it receives everything needed to survive from the mother's body. In a sense the fetus dies but it was never living to begin with so it can not be considered an act of murder as pro-lifers would argue. More simply consider acorns and trees. (Robinson) Just as an acorn is a fertilized egg of the oak, that does not make it a tree. Sure it has the potential to become an oak tree, but it has not yet grown to that…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "Yeagle v. Collegiate Times." Virginia Coalition for Open Government. 27 Feb. 1998. Web. 17 Oct.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays