Validating the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Author(s): Karma El Hassan and Ghida Madhum Reviewed work(s): Source: Higher Education, Vol. 54, No. 3 (Sep., 2007), pp. 361-383 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29735117 . Accessed: 26/02/2012 04:22 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Higher Education.
Higher Education (2007) 54:361-383 DOI 10.1007/sl0734-006-9002-z
theWatson EL HASSAN
Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal & GHIDA MADHUM
& Assessment Beirut 1107 2020, (OIR?), Lebanon American University of Beirut,
of Institutional Box st., P.O.
(WGCTA) evidence structure different
on a sample for construct and levels, subscale and
private was validation total streams correlations, a using was
investigated in addition series also
the test's factor through identifying to differences in scores by gender, tests. Evidence of ANOVA for the test's Moreover, students in five courses
and reliability that emphasize
factor revealed analysis in scores on differences different revealed results were with levels except
were tested the WGCTA. pre-post using thinking a unidimensional while factor results showed the WGCTA between students the senior males and females stream. or between
Exploratory no significant students at results
significant no showed and
for graduate for differences statistically
in the Business students between
Furthermore, streams. of scores
various The of
post-tested criterion results training
significant changes for nursing students. except measures evidence provided discussed effective in terms instructional were of
in the mean The of test's its
Finally, who students correlations divergent and thinking.
validities. the effects
were and for
and convergent of the construct of critical
Researchers today's schooling.
and workers school The graduate basic skills
in the field who and has
are being questioned graduate curriculum influenced strongly to Shepard 1994). According understanding, of transfer, aptitude culturally Today's critical thinking, developed. student and robust
gone that are possessed competencies by this new revised vision of the in light of the by cognitive psychology graduate includes metacognition, that are socially and (Frederiksen have should
the profile investigating at least 12 years through
today's (2000), that thought intelligent and intellectual abilities be an
skilled learner who uses independent, own learning in a student-centered his/her
362 system. learners This with
KARMA EL HASSAN AND GHIDA MADHUM should transform transferable education's skills role so that them it empowers to face any
lasting, allowing under any circumstances 1994). One of Educa? problem (Frederiksen to develop can tion's becomes critical thinkers who important goals use of knowledge solve problems, and...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document