Preview

Vacationspot.Com & Rent-a-Holiday

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4705 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Vacationspot.Com & Rent-a-Holiday
Introduction

VacationSpot.com and Rent-a-Holiday were both on-line travel companies that focused on the independent leisure lodging segment of the travel market. VacationSpot.com company comes from Seattle, Washington while Rent-a-holiday comes from other side of western world Brussels, Belgium. Both companies started at around same time and in April 1999 they entered formal merge negotiations.

In march of 1998 the CEO and president of VacationSpot.com Murch was contacted by the CEO of Rent-a-holiday Coppieters. Later Murch offered his partner the merge. First Coppieters did not want to hear anything about it but in April 1999 he and his partner Ingelbrecht sat on the plane to Seattle to talk about the merge. The discussion was very worth, both companies felt like they belong to each other and they have a lot to offer to the other side and much to earn from this merge. The talks lasted for two days. The first day was mostly about companies policies, strategies and the reasons why these companies should merge. Everything looked well until the price of the contract was said. Price of the merge was presented by the VacationSpot.com representatives at 9:1 ratio which means that VacationSpot.com would pay $ 27 million and Rent-a-Holiday would take part in the merge with $ 2 – 3 million. Rent-a-Holiday executives were also offered a long term employment contract in the merge.

After this price was presented the executives of Rent-a-Holiday walked out in anger saying that these talks was nothing more then wasting of their time.

The main problem was about the price ratio of the merge. Rent-a-Holiday executives felt like their company was lower-priced. According to their position in the market they expected to receive more valuable offer. The company from their point of view as they both were the founders of Rent-a-Holiday deserved more then 9:1 ratio. They also took this offer very personally expecting that Rent-a-Holiday should play stronger part in this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Stonewall Company and the Canadian Wallboard Company, as the main wallboard manufacturing corporations that are merging would create greater shareholder value than if the two corporations operate separately. The two companies, as the result of horizontal merger, come together to gain a much bigger market share and have access to more customers in the target market, which in turn, strengthens their competitive positions. [2]…

    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    OIL AND WASSER ASSIGNMENT

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Lack of communication (Both of them have strong culture, it’s hard for them to merge)…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    AirFrance-KLM Report

    • 1330 Words
    • 8 Pages

    decision to merge despite predictions of failure. The period covered by the case ends in 2006. As…

    • 1330 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tim Best Travel (Internal Stakeholders) They have main concerns as you, they will be worried that merging the companies may affect their client base and overall structure in the company.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tourism is an information-intensive industry and is said to hold together different components belonging to the travel industry, such as airlines, travel agencies, attractions, car rental and several other aspects (Poon, 1993). The main objective of a tour operator is to combine these components to create a holiday package. With the advent of the internet, tour operators can now expand their activities and make available relevant information, conquering new customers (Wyner, 2000). However, in order to do so effectively they have to overcome the problems of intangibility and perishability.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A MERGER has a great deal in common with a marriage. In both cases, each side needs to be clear-eyed about the other’s strengths and weaknesses, to find areas where the partners can work together and other areas where they could each use some personal space. As in a marriage there is always a discussion about whether a name change will occur, and couples may fight about whether to keep or toss one person’s beloved orange sofa. Merging companies too often botch their strategizing about which people to retain in the combined organization. They wait too long to start the analysis, they fail to offer appealing incentives to the people they want, and — just like a couple starting out together — they do not communicate effectively. We are not going to be this couple. This is why I am here today. We are going to communicate.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Merging two companies is a delicate procedure, requiring compromise and patience. Each company has built a certain culture over its existence, and each one believes that their…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bruce Tuckman's Model

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Thankfully, the need was not there to have to eliminate any positions or lay off any staff. We could keep all staff on board, which was the team goal early goal. We examined benefit costs per employee, and whether the merger would cause an increase in company subsidy for each employee, which would take away from the profit margins. After careful review of what both companies had to offer, we realized that the benefits package offered by Marriott International was more substantial and a better deal for both employees and the company. Although the employee out-of-pocket cost would slightly increase, the increase was not significant enough to make much of a difference to the staff, considering the extra benefits that would be accessible to them going forward.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fact, both companies seem as though they determined to merge no matter the cost nor the concession required. It appears as though there was very little foresight and planning for after the merger took place. Also, Pennsylvania was not the preferred choice for merging for New York Central but rather it was the default choice, as they had been turned down from merging with a different company previously. Finally, to ensure the deal took place they had made costly arrangements with Unions to rehire 5000 employees who had already been terminated as well they had to offer lifetime job protection which was a costly mistake due to the fact that the assumed cost savings were never realized. It appears as though both companies recognized the necessity to merge and were driven to that goal without proper planning for after the deal took place as…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. What synergies do you see in the merged AOL/TimeWarner Company that can give it the competitive advantage? In your opinion, why hasn’t the merger between these two companies been more successful?…

    • 7977 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morgan Stanley

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The merger was disruptive for a multitude of reasons. One being that the companies' technology was never implemented properly causing countless hours of problems which caused the company to lose much needed revenue and profit. This caused the brokers to be inadequate with the tools necessary when assisting their clients. The company's website was very marginal at best. It had several problems with functionality and maneuverability of the websites. The trade mechanism which allowed the purchasing and…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every coin has two sides. After the merger, both companies encountered several problems during their integration. Next, I will go into details about issues they faced.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paul

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe the major problem in this case is the fact that the two companies are not co-operating with one another, don’t see eye-to-eye with one another, and refuse to adapt to new ideas. With the information provided in the case, one can assume that the relationship between the two companies has a traditional orientation. As of now, both parties are focusing mainly on their own needs and profit. What they need to do is shift to a newer orientation in which there is equity, fair dealing and both parties are profitable.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alcatel-Lucent

    • 14200 Words
    • 57 Pages

    And this is what exactly happened after the merger. The company also made it clear that it did not have solutions to every problem; so those who had major problems adjusting to the post-merger situation were given time to move on.…

    • 14200 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Solutions M A Questions

    • 424 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a result of the merger, the combined firm is expected to have a cost of goods sold of only 86% of total revenues. The combined firm does not plan to borrow additional debt.…

    • 424 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays