Utopian vs. Dystopian
The future truly is a mystery. No one knows what it will honestly hold. There are so many key factors that control society. Among them are money, morals, class, and influence. Everyone wants a paradise or Utopia. Everyone hand in hand. No violence, crimes, illnesses, or corruption. There is only peace, love and happiness. It seems so ideal. It’s almost too good to be true; like something out of a dream. Well, that is because it is. It’s simply pure fiction. It is because the idea of utopia itself seems to be impossible. A real, material world of perfection cannot truly exist. As a matter of fact, “utopia” is translated literally as an imaginary good place that does not physically exist. This kind of world is not just unrealistic but also impractical. However, Dystopian and utopian societies are not so different after all. Dystopia is the opposite of utopia because everything seems to be imbalanced, chaotic, lawless, unruly, dirty, violent, and controlling. In several novels, the dystopian setting is also guised as somewhat similar to a utopian society. It’s just that upon further immersion into that society, eventually it is revealed that there’s excessive control, repression, and abuse. As distant as this may sound, dystopian stories have similar characteristics to the current society, unlike utopian books. Dystopian literature is superior to utopian literature because it has a sense of familiarity, provides a sense of realism to readers, bestows warnings upon the readers and uses a great deal of creativity. Utopian literature is basically social commentary: social criticism of what is and social suggestion of what could be. Its means are social rearrangement. The Utopia is usually far away in space, or time, or both, and the way of getting there is not clear or easy. In its lack of heavy-handedness, utopian literature tends to be light-hearted, playful, and optimistic. Utopian literature focuses its attention on the problems...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document