Utilitarianism Vs Libertarianism

Save the Poor or Be Free to Create Your Own Choices

Thank you for understanding the importance of incorporating an ethical perspective into this serious situation. With my expertise, I believe that the government should employ a utilitarian approach, which maximizes the greatest prosperity to the greatest number of the population, by requiring Lester Lumber Company to distribute the remaining lumber amongst the poor at a discounted price. The alternative option is libertarianism, which is the idea of creating minimal state interference and allowing inequality to occur due to people’s freedom of choice. In my opinion, you should not carry out a libertarian ethical theory, as a utilitarian perspective allows for the maximum happiness in a wholesome
It takes into account a kind of cost-benefit analysis that incorporates the immense amount of people in society and tries to maximize the Greatest Happiness Principle. This principle “holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill, pg.7). This shows utilitarian’s hope to create an excelling society by including the satisfaction for the largest amount of people with no intention of punishing others. The true morals are based off qualitative and quantitative happiness. Qualitative happiness is shown by the intensity of the pleasures, or who needs it more than others. Quantitative is simply the most amount of people that are in need of the pleasure. With these measurements of pleasure and pain, utilitarianism can create the maximum amount of happiness. For utilitarians, the utility of happiness is the ultimate purpose to human life. The most important thing for everyone is to incorporate happiness and maximize it whenever necessary and for the most people in all of society. Utilitarianism is not an egoist theory. They do not intend on creating contentment for an individual, but rather the entire society. This enforces the idea that pleasures in society while diminishing pain should be the primary ambition for
They believe distributing the justice among everyone in society so that everyone is able to be treated fairly and with respect. “If it is a duty to do to each according to his deserts, returning good for good as well as repressing evil by evil, it necessarily follows that we should treat all equally well who have deserved equally well of us” (Mill, pg. 61). This reinforces the utilitarian points on how people, wealthy or poor, should be treated equally and have the right to achieve the same levels of happiness. By creating equality within the society, utilitarians are then able to form the Greatest Happiness Principle. It is considered unjust not to treat others equally and with