Preview

Utilitarianism: Should The President Did The Right Thing?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
166 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarianism: Should The President Did The Right Thing?
The utilitarianism position for this specific event is that the president wants to try and prevent other negative things from happening. The president wants to try and save as many lives as he can to do this he decided to restrict everyone’s freedom. I believe the president would rather have people live a more controlled life than have the risk of more people dying. Honestly I do believe that the president did the right thing by maybe restricting the people’s freedom in order to save lives. When a major terrorist attack happening not too long ago I would do everything to try and prevent that by any means necessary. Think about it if catastrophic event happened to you I bet you would do everything in your power to try and prevent that from happening
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Was Truman Justified In Making Ethical Decisions
    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Was Truman Justified In Making Ethical Decisions

    It was August 6, 1945 when the first ever atomic bomb dropped on the city of Hiroshima in Japan. Three days later another was dropped on the city of Nagasaki, Japan and this let to the surrender of Japan in World War II. The surrender would have not occurred so soon if it had not been for President Harry Truman’s decision to use the first ever nuclear attack on another nation. His decision changed history and the way the world worked. This meant that nuclear power was out there at the disposal of the United States for them to use whenever they saw fit. The decision Truman had to make was extremely difficult seeing as he was faced with a huge ethical dilemma whether to kill entire cities to save millions of American lives. The issue was not only was it ethically right but did he have enough justification to prove to the world that dropping the atomic bomb was the only way to end the war.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    If The Founders Saw The President Essay
    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If The Founders Saw The President Essay

    This law allows the president to send the military into action against anyone deemed a terrorist, essentially making it a “blank check” justifying any military action. The Founders would be astonished by this act, as it gives the President almost unlimited authority to use the military. They expected Congress to rein in the President on military matters, as the Constitution only authorized military appropriations for two year periods which was intended to keep the President from permanently supporting an army.2I also believe the Founders would disapprove of the idea of the “legislating president.” While executive orders have been issued by almost every President, they have always been criticized as increasingly violating Congress’ power to make the laws. The line between making laws and enforcing them has been blurred as presidents choose to enforce laws differently. While the presidency was given several specific powers, the Take Care clause has been interpreted to mean that the President may enforce laws however he sees fit, greatly expanding presidential…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Should Civil Liberties Be Restricted During Times of War
    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should Civil Liberties Be Restricted During Times of War

    During America's most consequential wars, the United States government has restricted civil liberties of the American people despite the nation’s strong rooted foundation for preserving every citizen’s rights. When danger is an ever present factor for the nation due to war or conflict restrictions are often placed on some of the most basic freedoms and liberties. Perfect balancing of these restrictions is vital to the countries wellbeing. One of the most well-known examples of this type of restraint is Abraham Lincoln’s precedent of suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus and issuing martial law. Lincoln’s actions clearly violated the rights of the people that are guaranteed to them under the Constitution. While out of context it wouldn’t make much sense, the specific circumstance’s Abraham Lincoln was facing completely justified his unconstitutional orders. In retrospect we can now see how important Lincoln’s decisions were; If not for his actions the union may never have won the Civil War and history would have been irreparably altered. History repeated itself when following in Lincoln’s footstep’s, President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized the internment of over 100,000 people of Japanese descent in response to Japan’s attacks on the Pearl Harbor Naval Base. The country was in a state of panic and a response was needed to make Americans feel secure. Less than five decades later a similar attack devastated America. Similar to Roosevelt, George W. Bush was catapulted into taking responsive action after the September 11th terrorist attacks on U.S soil. His response was the Patriot Act. It was our founding fathers intentions for the people of these United States to be sheltered by liberty and freedom, however, it’s clear that later day presidents used a strong balance of discretion and justice for the sake of a greater good and national security. The government should be able to impede certain civil liberties should the situation arise where it is necessary as long as…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus: The Ultimate Writ of Liberty
    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Habeas Corpus: The Ultimate Writ of Liberty

    In time of war, many quick and unpopular decisions are inevitable. The decisions the President has to make must be in the best interest of the country, and of the world. Although war is unpopular with many people, it is unavoidable in certain circumstances. During wartime, many American people want known enemy combatants to have their rights upheld while being detained. Unfortunately, this is not always feasible. One has to understand that the taking of the liberty of a handful of people to save the lives of thousands, or even millions of people is an unavoidable act. When a citizen of a foreign country, or a citizen of America, who has turned to terrorism, goes to war with America, the rights given to American citizens by the Constitution should be denied.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism
    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism

    On this topic of gay marriage I’ve chosen the two ethical theories of utilitarianism and the Kantian ethics theory. On the pro side the utilitarianism theory plays a huge role when referring to this topic. Some may argue that it is constitutional and some may say that it just isn’t the right thing to do in this country. With this theory the actions are said to be judged in terms of promotion of human happiness. If someone is happy why it should matter what the law or government thinks. It’s important in addition with this topic because gay marriage is something that has been going on for a couple years now. The news and media has made it obvious, and with this argument there are two sides. Should gay marriage be acted upon as something normal…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was There Anything Unethical About The President's Actions?
    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Was There Anything Unethical About The President's Actions?

    The ten stockholders would be their stakeholders. The stakeholders are a group but without its support the organization would cease to exist. And they wanted to ensure that their stockholders received their dividends, to keep their interest in the company.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Natural Right and Utilitarianism
    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Natural Right and Utilitarianism

    Locke's concept of the social contract is to protect people's rights. According to Locke the contract is between the people and these branches of government that they set up. The reason government arises the social contract between people, is because that people want to live longer and better. The legitimacy of the government comes from the fact we consent to set up that authority and protect our natural rights. For example, if we designate a group of people as the executive power to enforce our law, in that case they will be part of the contract, and we contract them to do certain job since they are protected by the natural right. But if the executive power will abuse the system, by brutalize someone or be racist to them, then we will be able to remove them, and that's how rebellion and political change is built into Locke's system, which will be very important for a revolution.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism
    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Act Utilitarianism

    The theory of Utilitarianism was first developed by Jeremy Bentham who was a philosopher of the 18th century. Bentham developed this theory to create a modern and rational approach to morality which would suit the changing society.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Government Action: Detrimental Or Helpful
    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Government Action: Detrimental Or Helpful

    The government infringed upon some individuals’ freedoms by detaining suspected terrorists. Some were detained in the United States and some were apprehended outside of the country. Either way, the government interfered with their liberties. It’s understandable that they were concerned about nation security, but taking away people’s freedoms in a desperate attempt to save face is horrendous.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should civil liberties be suspended during war-time?
    • 332 Words
    • 1 Page

    Should civil liberties be suspended during war-time?

    We can understand how certain precautions must be made to insure safety in times of war but to go so far as to take away our freedoms are out of bounds. There are numerous other ways to make us safe without interfering with our liberties. For example: tighter security. After 9/11 security became very tight at airports and other areas where terrorists might be able to enter the country. Although this extra security was tedious and time consuming to get through, it was well within the lines of the 1st amendment because it did not take away any of our freedoms.…

    • 332 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Argument Synthesis Paper
    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Argument Synthesis Paper

    September 11th was definitely one of the grimmest times in America’s recent history. There was security breach at the airports and American planes were hijacked and crashed into the world trade centre. The terrorists were suspected to be al-Qaida and approximately 3000 lives were lost on one day. For the attacks to be staged successful the terrorists had to by-pass the security systems and they succeeded. It is the duty of the government to put in place methods to prevent a recurrence of the event and protect its citizens. Safety of the citizens is far important than individual privacy. Although each individual is entitled right of liberty and privacy, the government may interfere with the privacy of individual for security reasons.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism Is Wrong
    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism Is Wrong

    First I would like to start off by defining what utilitarian mean well based off of the module a utilitarian is the person who believes in the greater good in other words a person who would take losses and justify it’s worth by the results gained from it. Now in regard to the question on how might utilitarian respond to the situation of the innocent man who was executed in order to keep the citizens from rioting. My answer to that is it would be the exact same result, because of how a utilitarian thinks. In situations like this I would guess that a utilitranian would not even hesitate to kill the innocent man, because a utilitrain would think that excuting the innocent man would be beneficial for the majority of the citizens so he would…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Liberty Vs. Security
    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Liberty Vs. Security

    This attacks always generate panic and increase anxiety. After the attack of 9/11 the government exercise some acts to give security to the citizens. Congress enacted the USA Patriot Act by overwhelming, bipartisan margins, arming law enforcement with new tools to detect and prevent terrorism. (USA Patriot Act, n.d.) Indeed the law was enacted to fight terrorism, intercept any information and punished the terrorist. Nonetheless, it raised some concerns about the civil liberties. Guantanamo Bay is an example of denied liberty of some is less important than the security of others. For the detentions in Guantanamo bay officials had to make arrest of suspected terrorist and later rely on charges. President Bush's passage of the Military Commissions Act in 2006 authorized the use of military tribunals in place of federal courts to try the detainees, and justified the use of some forms of physical coercion (or, as critics call it, torture) during interrogations (Fetini, 2008). Many of these prisoners lost their civil liberties and later it was found that many of them were wrongfully apprehended. In Captain America: Civil War another example is when Captain America team are taken in to a maximum security prison because they were supposed to be criminals. It’s a wrong thing to do to put someone in detention without giving reasons to put the innocent behind bars, to be shoddy…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism In Healthcare
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism In Healthcare

    In a recent article on healthcare, entitled Value in Cancer Care, it was announced the American Society of Clinical Oncology are proposing to provide “a tool to help patients decide if cancer drugs are worth it”. A group of doctors are proposing this tool to give people a way of measuring “what treatment will cost them and how much good it is likely to do” in making an informed decision on their care. (Marchione, 2015) The reason for this is cited as being due to the rising cost of cancer treatment and patients themselves incurring more of the costs. The original article, entitled: American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options, in referring to value states: “the definition…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument For Utilitarianism
    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argument For Utilitarianism

    Among the ethical arguments that we have seen, it is clear that a form of utilitarianism is the best option, that is, we should always do what brings about the best outcome where the outcomes are rated by the amount of good they bring about. The utilitarian argument says that in any given decision, the option that brings about the most good is the right thing to do every time. That being said, the definition of good is extremely important to the soundness of the argument. In this case, the best view of what is good is that of a hedonist, that is, a thing is good if it brings about pleasure and bad if it brings about suffering. To add to this however, I would argue that the best good outcome is the outcome which…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics