Preview

Utilitarianism and Deontology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1004 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarianism and Deontology
UTILITARIANISM AND DEONTOLOGY
Action we take must have consequences whether good or bad. Utilitarianism is a theory that focuses on consequences that will bring about the best possible outcome of any situation, in terms of individuality or people, this means some sort of pleasure and happiness must be the result. On the other hand, deontology focus on the doing the right thing, were your intentions will be understood based on the right thing where everyone in your position would do the same, more like a universal command of doing good without concentrating on the consequences. We look at utilitarianism and deontology in more detail and express which theory I find more convincing. And summing up the theories in the conclusion.
Bentham (1824. p, 392)Utilitarianism focuses on the outcome whether of an individual or a group this, means utilitarianism theory do not consider actions, because actions determine the outcome. For a utilitarian, the outcome must give a sense of happiness or pleasure. Look at the history of the former first black president of South Africa Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, “Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela was conceived on July 18, 1918” (Kramer, 2003), he was the first President of South Africa to be chosen in completely illustrative equitable races. His Given name Rolihlahla which implies one who brings inconvenience upon himself he spent 27 years in prison during the "apartheid" time, apartheid was the discrimination of people classified by their skin color where people were not equal before the law in South Africa before 1994. The former president's life was put on hold, his happiness and pleasure of being with his friends and family was taken away. Nelson Mandela as a lawyer, voluntarily represented many detainees under the ANC whilst he was volunteer-in-chief for the ANC, after he was released he showed Utilitarianism leadership through soldiering ahead to fight for apartheid and became the first black democratic president in South Africa under the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Eth 501 Module 1

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Everyone has the duty to make the right decision or action. The question with deontological ethics, however, is to whom or what is that duty. Utilitarian ethics have an easier way of determining the choice or decision at hand. What maximizes the most amount of good for the most amount of people? Deontological ethics, however, makes decision independent of consequences for the majority or for one’s self. A deontologist makes a decision because it is right. Also, deontological decisions are found to be moral only if the motivation is moral. If the motivation is not ethical, then the action itself is not ethical regardless of how much good was done in the process of doing that action. (Deontological ethics,…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The positives are that right and wrong actions are considered by a persons duties such as religion. However, the use of judgment is essential to the duties, and having the knowledge to apply those duties is key. Unlike utilitarianism, the final action will not justify the method. Deontological theories grant a stable ground for unchangeable rights and distinctive value. If the duties have no change then there will be a greater sense of stability in the acceptance of others. The rights and wrong doings do not adjust to the consequences, however there can be different circumstances. Good value wights out the bad even if the outcome was not expected.…

    • 291 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth316 Week 1 Assignment

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Having a full understanding of the similarities and difference between deontological ethics, virtue theory, and utilitarianism begins with by explaining every ethic theory. With deontology ethic theories is that there is a vital importance on the relations between liability and the principles of actions, which human take. The virtue theory is defined as humanizing excellence in life and founding an characteristic of a good person. Utilitarianism is a theory that states that an action is right when that action can create more help for yourself or group than other back up actions.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike virtue theory, deontology has a heavy emphasis on duty in action, in adherence to rules. The right action is important here, where upon completion, should bring about the greatest good for all involved. This is somewhat similar to utilitarianism, which does focus on the consequence of the greatest good. However, deontology does not lean on the consequence itself, but more so the principle behind committing the right action. (Boylan, 2009). In turn, the ethics behind deontology is about principle and following rules.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deontology: A nonconsequentialist ethical theory that claims an act is to be evaluated in terms ofits accordance with a specified set of rules. (Mosser, 2013)Virtue Ethics: An ethical theory that focuses on the character of the agent in evaluating moral behavior, in contrast to utilitarianism or deontology; often associated with Aristotle. (Mosser, 2013)Utilitarianism: A consequentialist ethical theory that evaluates moral claims in terms of their outcomes and to the extent these outcomes generate the greatest benefit for the greatest number. (Mosser, 2013)I was at the grocery store checking out in the self checkout lane, and I noticed that A single mom and her 3 kids were having to take out items because she had reached her limit, I noticed…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontology is defined by the moral obligation of rules and duties. The rules and duties are based on the correctness or principle of an action without regard to consequences. This compares to utilitarianism where the right action is determined by how the action brings about the greatest utility to the group as a whole (Boylan, 2009). Both theories disregard the consequences of that action. Deontology ignores the all consequences, where utilitarianism ignores the consequences to the individual.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The result of a situation or dilemma is through sound ethical and moral decisions. The differences between the three theories are virtue is an individual assessment, utilitarianism is for the group, and deontology is the duty of the individual or group. Virtue and the goal of achieving the best can cause an individual to question morals and ethics. Cheating to be the best is not moral or ethical. Knowing 100% is put forth toward a goal will bring out the positive characteristics of an individual. Utilitarianism refers to ethical and morality issues by focusing on the overall balance of good over bad consequences of the group. A corporation that reduces medical benefits of the employees to increase corporate bonuses is unethical. A police officer pulls a car over and a fellow officer is driving while intoxicated. The deontology theory would require the officer to arrest the friend because of duty and obligation to the…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eth316-Ethic Essay

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On the other hand, utilitarianisms are the opposite of deontology because it focuses on the individual as a team player who put the good of the team before their own good. “This theory suggests that an action is morally right when that action produces more total utility for the group than any other alternative” (Bolan, 2009, p. 153). For example, telling the lie would be justifiable if doing so results in greater good for…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    QUIZ ON MORAL PHILOSOPHY 1. Which moral theory includes the “interests” of sentient animals (other than humans) into the moral landscape as having rights which do not simply depend on what humans assign them? Aristotle Virtue Ethics. 2. In the video on Deontology, what example does Kant use to illustrate a negative duty (which is perfect) and which cannot be modified to suit the situation.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontology is an ethical theory that only focuses on the act itself, not on the actions the act itself will bring about. Deontologists do acknowledge that actions bring on certain reactions but do not believe the reaction should be taken into consideration when determining if an act was moral or not. “Deontology, taken in its largest sense, is meant that branch of art and science which has for its object the doing on each occasion what is right and proper to be done “(Louden, 1996). Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative takes this and breaks it down into rules and with these rules assumes that all people are moral. These rules have no “but” to them, they are straightforward, basically if you do this, you are moral or immoral. For example, if you kill someone, no matter if it is in self-defense or cold blooded then the person is considered immoral. This theory is not complicated and very to the point, it is easy to follow and has many supporters.…

    • 756 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Essay Eth/316

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Deontology Theory states that there is a moral duty for one to act no matter the circumstances. This theory is furthered by the thought process of not thinking through any actions or the consequences but because it is action that is taken is right. “The word “deontology” comes from two Greek words, deion+ logos. Deion comes from the particle dei which means “must.” Logos (in this context) means “the account…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Utilitarianism theory supports individual capability to foresee the costs of an act. A Utilitarian considers the decision of giving the best profit to a large number of people; this is known to be ethically correct.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deontology is an ethical theory whose name is derived from the Greek word “deon,” meaning duty or obligation. Most ethical theories are concerned with what is right or good, and they often attempt to find this by applying a rule or several rules that seem to fit with outcomes that we most commonly find are "good". Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists, such as a utilitarian, believe the end will always justify the means, a deontologist will assert that the rightness of an action lays in the intent. It is the inherent nature of the act alone that determines its ethical standing. Deontology implies that certain actions are…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In contrast to this theory is Deontology attributed to philosopher Immanuel Kant. Where a utilitarian focuses on the outcome of an action to determine the ethical choice, Deontology dictates the choice, action, or means themselves must be ethical regardless of the outcome.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 1278 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In A Critique of Utilitarianism, Bernard Williams argues that when following a Utilitarian approach for moral dilemmas, Utilitarianism might have us sacrifice or modify our moral integrity. Williams explains this argument with a hypothetical execution situation with protagonist Jim. Jim, who is a botanical expeditionary, accidentally wanders in the central square of a small South American town. There, he finds twenty Indians tied up in a row, with several armed soldiers standing in front of them. The captain in charge of the soldiers, Pedro, is ready to execute the Indians for protesting against the government. However, Jim is a foreigner and is honored by the captain. Because of this special occasion, Pedro gives Jim the option to shoot and kill one Indian. If Jim accepts, the other nineteen Indians can go free, if not, Pedro will shoot all twenty like intended. The Indians beg Jim to accept the offer and shoot one of them. Now, Jim is faced with a difficult decision whether to shoot one Indian or let Pedro shoot all of them. What should Jim do? It is not sure what the right course of action is, but four different theories could help him decide. These theories are: the Divine Command theory, Cultural Relativism, Kantianism, and Utilitarianism. In this paper, I will present these four theories and their suggestions for Jim’s right course of action, the faults in these theories, and how Utilitarianism is morally correct in this case.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays