Preview

Using your own knowledge as well as the extract, explain why, in practice, parliamentary sovereignty is not undermined by the Human Rights Act.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
525 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Using your own knowledge as well as the extract, explain why, in practice, parliamentary sovereignty is not undermined by the Human Rights Act.
Using your own knowledge as well as the extract, explain why, in practice, parliamentary sovereignty is not undermined by the Human Rights Act. (10 marks)

Parliamentary gives Parliament superior and legal authority as they can make or unmake any Act of Parliament they wish and although the House of Commonsâ has most of the dominance they always need the support of the House of Lords to pass an Act. Parliamentary sovereignty refers to this joint power. The Human Rights Act 1998 is a law passed by Parliament that has limited the application of parliamentary sovereignty as it is made unlawful for any public body to act in a way which is incompatible with the Convention although the courts can only make a declaration.

Under the Human Rights Act, it is the role of the judiciary to interpret the law, as far as possible, in a way that is compatible with the rights of the Convention. However, it is not possible to interpret an Act of Parliament and make the law compatible with the Convention as they cannot override it and only make a declaration of incompatibility, a suggestion to Parliament that the law should be changed to coincide with Convention rights. It is then the majority party that will decide in Parliament of the changes, maintaining the sovereignty. The repercussions of this in terms of maintaining a democratic government because of the fact unelected and therefore unaccountable judges are influencing elected politicians. However, sanctions from the EU can be made if a member country does not come into line, for example the organisation gave Italy an economic sanction for its policy of sending away Libyan migrants who had approached Italy by sea.

It could argued that the Human Rights Act gave Tony Blairâs Government the UK a sense that their rights were much better protected and acted as an âembellishmentâ for New Labour because with parliamentary sovereignty a law can be made or unmade by parliament as it is not entrenched. Prime Minister David

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A.V Dicey gives an introduction to the doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty as, “the principle of Parliamentary sovereignty means neither more nor less than this, namely, that Parliament thus defined has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and, further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having the right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament’. However, there are many discussions as to whether the UK joining with the European Union and adherence to the Human Rights Act 1998 renders sovereignty irrelevant. It will be argued that although following these rules may appear to be contradictory to sovereignty, co-operation is entirely voluntary, necessary, and there are many examples as to why sovereignty is not irrelevant, nor archaic.…

    • 793 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rights Act of 1997, a key constitutional Act of Parliament, outlining the rights of citizens and visitors…

    • 1184 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One must find it difficult to give an accurate opinion on whether a constitutionally entrenched Bill of Rights will endeavour to create a more legitimate society. It is true that judges are introducing fundamental human rights jurisprudence by the techniques of the common law, and that legislators are enacting laws based upon international human rights principles. However, it remains valid to point out that these modes of introducing fundamental human rights, lack the legitimacy of democracy. It is…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Human Rights Act 2000

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Human Rights Act is a protective Bill of Rights. It started life at the end of the Second World War to prevent further atrocities against humanity, from happening. The Convention was drawn up by the Council of Europe to promote peace, equality and basic human rights, and it has evolved over the years.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliamentary Sovereignty

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To define parliamentary sovereignty does not seem too complicated when it is assessed in isolation. Only in connection with other constitutional principles difficult tensions arise. The orthodox view of parliamentary sovereignty is simply that only parliament has the right to make or unmake law and that no other institution can challenge that right. This also includes the rule that parliament cannot bind its successors. Parliament can follow its own procedural rules as it wishes and court cannot examine the procedure by which legislation has been passed (enrolled bill rule).…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Independence causes the formation of rights within the political context. Rights arise from this idea as, if the individual does everything independently and chooses the right things, there would be no need for laws in the first place. If someone cannot act independently without commonwealth’s guidance, rights wouldn’t even exist.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Human Rights Act 1998 was introduced in the United Kingdom in October 2000. The act gives all public authorities a general duty to ensure that everybody should be treated equally and with dignity – no matter what their circumstances.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nevertheless, parliament being the most superior body can have negative impacts on the society. Even though there is the Human Rights Act, Parliament can still override it as it’s not entrenched, like the Bill of Rights in the US is (Heywood, 2011). The following paragraph will state the third type of…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The department for constitutional affairs., 1998. A guide to the human rights act 1998. 3rd ed. [online] Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/act-studyguide.pdf [Accessed on 15th Oct 2011].…

    • 3532 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament is the supreme law-making body in the UK. This means that there are no constitutional restrains on legislative powers. This also includes the fact that courts are under an obligation to give effect to legislation passed by Parliament and not question statutes. Most importantly, Parliamentary Sovereignty is not a constitutional relic. This is simply because UK courts cannot strike down Act of Parliament. First assertion of Dicey is that Parliament’s legislative competence is unlimited. This was shown in Mortensen v Peters (1906). In this case, it was held that parliament is supreme over international law and UK courts felt bound to apply the UK Act, even though it was in contravention of international law. Another case that illustrates…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The development of social policies within the United Kingdom is extremely complex. Often involving conflicting factors. Each government must consider human rights and the individual entitlement of members, while also respecting the political and social moral values of the state. Human rights are basic rights and freedoms that every human is entitled to regardless of who they are, where they were born or how they chose to live their life. In the United Kingdom, these rights and freedoms are protected by the Human Right Act 1998 (Equality and human rights commission, 2010).…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of parliament as a law-maker. Illustrate your answer with a comparison of law-making by courts. (12 marks)…

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Parliamentary Sovereignty

    • 2300 Words
    • 10 Pages

    When we talk about 'Parliament' and 'parliamentary sovereignty' what exactly do we mean? Firstly we must take the word 'Parliament' to mean not the actual Houses of Parliament themselves but instead the Acts passed by Parliament with the consent of the Commons, Lords and the Queen. The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty is about the relationship between those who create the Acts (Parliament) and those who must apply them (courts). The argument we find ourselves trying to answer is who in fact has the supreme power? Is it the law makers or those who must apply the law? To present an analogy of the problem we could ask who has supreme power in a game of football or rugby. Is it the governing body who make the rules or is it the referee who must apply the rules in each game using his discretion as each situation occurs. The analogy may seem crude but judges find themselves in the exact position of referees. The question therefore remains, who is supreme?…

    • 2300 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural Law Theory

    • 6442 Words
    • 26 Pages

    [ 16 ]. Cambell, Ewing and Tomkins, ‘Sceptical Essays on Human Rights’ (OUP 2001) p297-315…

    • 6442 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Charter

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The best thing which has ever happened to Canada that makes Sir Charles proud to be Canadian[1] is the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Thirty years ago, on April 17, 1982, Queen Elizabeth, sitting in front of Canada’s Parliament Buildings on an overcast morning, proclaimed in force the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a key element of the new Constitution Act. The Charter, whose 30th anniversary was considered by 79% of the population worth celebrating[2], brought about many changes in Canadian society, its impact being described in revolutionary terms[3]. The focus of this essay is the analysis of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and its impact on the world, from the individual to actual nations. To do so, the evolutions of the political arena and, consequently of human rights will be investigated, together with the examination of certain rights and freedoms as viewed through the lenses of scholars situated at opposite ends of the spectrum. Through this analysis, I will evince that the enactment of the Charter is the most significant moment in Canadian history, being a unique document and a model for the world.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays