Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Using Context to Understand Content

Better Essays
1716 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Using Context to Understand Content
Using Context to Understand Content

The context and content of any situation are always powerful contributions to the way people view different things. People in modern society may see that content and context have equal importance, but others may not. Everyone’s perspective is different and everyone’s perspective changes through time. “The Power of Context: Bernie Goetz and the Rise and Fall of New York City Crime” by Malcolm Gladwell demonstrates how powerful context may be in many different situations. He gives many explanations to why a man named Bernie Goetz shot four young men on the train in 1984. In “Homo Religiosus”, Karen Armstrong writes about the different beliefs and religions that people followed. She tells her readers about the myths and rituals that were involved with those religions. In “Homo Religiosus” she demonstrates that people’s perceptions of religion from early times in history have changed completely compared to perceptions of religion in modern times. In selections from Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, Krakauer writes about his journey and experience into the wild where he searches for an understanding on what caused McCandless’s death while also revealing McCandless’s journey in the wilderness. All three texts depict how people’s perspective may change throughout time. Gladwell, Armstrong, and Krakauer demonstrate how context gives people a new perspective that greatly influences the way they understand the content of a situation. Context greatly affects people’s perception of any type of situation. If we were given a situation and was not given any context, then we would start to make quick judgments. For example, Malcolm Gladwell talks about the Questioner and Contestant experiment. The Questioner comes up with questions based on his or her interests or expertise. Gladwell states that after the quiz, “the Contestants rate the Questioners as being a lot smarter than they themselves are” (Gladwell 162). However, the Contestants were not informed that the Questioners were knowledgeable in the subject of the question they were asking. This shows that since the Contestant was not given much context behind the quiz game, the Contestant made a judgment that the Questioner was smarter than him. People may also make a quick judgment when reading “Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer. For example, when Krakauer questioned the men that discovered McCandless’s body, Gordon Samel and Ken Thompson state, “The kid didn’t know what the hell he was doing up here…The paper said he’d shot a moose, that told me right there he wasn’t no Alaskan. There’s a big difference between a moose and a caribou… You’d have to be pretty stupid not to be able to tell them apart” (Krakauer, 217). From there it can be seen that the two Alaskan hunters, Samel and Thompson, made judgments on McCandless based on what they saw when they discovered McCandless in the abandoned school bus. The hunters were not aware of what McCandless was trying to achieve on his journey into the wild and instead the Alaskan hunters automatically assumed that McCandless was just a stupid kid trying to survive in the wild. All of these judgments are made because people were not given much context of the situation. Context greatly affects the way people interpret the content. When some context of a situation is given, a new perspective is created. If people are presented with a situation with some context then we start to gain more meaning and more understanding of the situation. For example, when Gladwell talks more about the Contestant and the Questioner he states that “The result will come out in the same way even when you give people a clear and immediate environmental explanation of the behavior they are being asked to evaluate: that the Contestant is being asked to answer the most impossible biased and rigged set of questions” (Gladwell 162). Gladwell demonstrates that if the Contestant is given some form of context, the Contestant’s understanding of the situation will be changed. The Contestant’s opinions change because then he or she knows that the Questioner created the questions to the Questioner’s expertise. Gladwell states, “There is something in all of us that makes us instinctively want to explain the world is around us in terms of essential attributes: that person is smarter than I am” (Gladwell 162). Gladwell writes about how the Contestant’s opinion changes because the Contestant wants to look for an explanation or excuse as to why he or she did not know the answers to the quiz. The Contestants change their point of view because their judgment changes from how they were dumber than the Questioners to how they weren’t actually dumb; they were just being questioned based on subjects they did not understand. If the Contestant were to be the Questioner, then the Contestant would make questions that he or she has interest or expertise in. In Armstrong’s “Homo Religiosus” we can also see how people’s perspectives change when there is more context provided. For example, Armstrong states in her text, “The initiation ceremonies marked the adolescent boy’s rite of passage from childhood to maturity… When they reach puberty, boys are taken from their mothers and put through frightening ordeals that transform them into men” (Armstrong 25). Armstrong gives a situation with a lot of context and reason to why boys are put through an initiation ceremony. The boys in Armstrong’s text relate to the Contestants of Gladwell’s text because they are both being put through trials that change their perspectives on their situations. The Contestants’ understanding of how smart the Questioners were changed, and the boys of Armstrong’s essay change their understanding of their religion while going through the initiation ceremony. As for Krakauer, he goes into the wild himself and sees the moose that McCandless killed, then Krakauer’s perspective changes. For example, Krakauer states, “The ungulate McCandless shot was exactly what he’d said it was. Contrary to what I reported, the animal was a moose…the boy made some mistakes on the Stampede Trail, but confusing a caribou with a moose wasn’t among them” (Krakauer, 216). This demonstrates that Krakauer went into the wild to see for himself and proved that McCandless did shoot a moose, and the Alaskan Hunters were wrong. Then Krakauer’s perspective began to change because all these critics thought that McCandless was stupid for mixing up a caribou and a moose. Krakauer’s point of view on McCandless changed because McCandless was not as stupid as the critics made him out to be. All three texts provide many examples of how a person may create a new perspective on a situation when reason and explanation through context is provided. When people change their perspective on a situation, it gives them new understanding and judgment of content. For example, when Gladwell commented on the Contestant and Questioner experiment, he says, “We are a lot more attuned to personal cues than contextual cues” (Gladwell, 162). Gladwell is trying to say that people pay more attention to the opinions rather than the context of the situation. The Contestant said that the Questioner was smarter than him, although the Contestant was just not as knowledgeable in that subject area. The Contestant had a new perspective and changed his judgment on content. Another example would be that throughout Armstrong’s essay she analyzes how the boys that go through the initiation ceremony change. Armstrong states in her text, “if the initiation is skillfully handled, it can lead to a constructive reorganization of the young man’s powers. He has faced death, come out the other side, and is now psychologically prepared to risk his life for his people” (Armstrong, 25). The boys that go through the initiation are forced to go through many frightening trials, but after the initiation is over their entire outlook on life has changed and it gave them a new understanding and connection for their religion. The boys have changed their perspective and it gave them a new understanding of the men that they have become. Another example from Armstrong is when she states that “Before the modern period, most men and women were naturally inclined to religion and they were prepared to work at it. Today many of us are no longer willing to make this effort” (Armstrong 27). Armstrong demonstrates that people’s perspectives on religion have changed from believing in their religion because it gave their lives meaning to believing in their religion because someone told them to. Also in Armstrong’s text she demonstrates how her perspective on religion has changed which gave her a new understanding of the content in religion. Other than Armstrong, Krakauer presents himself as an example of a person that changes his perspective on a situation, which leads to a new understanding of content. Krakauer writes in his text that he and his friends “talk about this peculiar person whom none of us ever met, trying to get a handle on how he came to grief, trying to understand why some people seem to despise him so intensely for dying here” (Krakauer 217). As Krakauer went on his own journey his perspective changed and he uses the context from McCandless’s past with the moose to try and understand the content that explains why McCandless died. All three texts show how when a person’s perspective changes on a situation, it effects their understanding of content. In conclusion, situations without and context given may cause people to make quick judgments. However, when situations are presented with a lot of context and detail, it causes people to create a new perspective. Then along with this new perspective it gives people new understanding of content based on the context given. Krakauer, Armstrong, and Gladwell demonstrate this relationship between context and content and how strongly both context and content affect people. Before people read into the context of a situation, they might make judgments that can be seen so negatively. Context greatly affects the way people understand content.

Works Cited
Krakauer, Jon. “Selections from Into the Wild.” The New Humanities Reader 4th Edition. Wadsworth, Boston, MA (2012) 202-222. Print. Armstrong, Karen. “Homo Religiosus” The New Humanities Reader 4th Edition. Wadsworth, Boston, MA (2012) 21-38. Print. Gladwell, Malcolm. “The Power of Context: Bernie Goetz and the Rise and Fall of New York City Crime.” The New Humanities Reader 4th Edition. Wadsworth, Boston, MA (2012) 151-165. Print.

Cited: Krakauer, Jon. “Selections from Into the Wild.” The New Humanities Reader 4th Edition. Wadsworth, Boston, MA (2012) 202-222. Print. Armstrong, Karen. “Homo Religiosus” The New Humanities Reader 4th Edition. Wadsworth, Boston, MA (2012) 21-38. Print. Gladwell, Malcolm. “The Power of Context: Bernie Goetz and the Rise and Fall of New York City Crime.” The New Humanities Reader 4th Edition. Wadsworth, Boston, MA (2012) 151-165. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the 1980s, the City of New York was a City polluted with waste and graffiti, where people would always get away with committing a crime. In Malcolm Gladwell’s essay “The Power of Context: Bernie Goetz and the Rise and Fall of New York City Crime” gives us a probable explanation of how a change like this can happen. The essay is an environmental argument, with varying kinds of a seemingly endless amount of verification, which suggests that crimes can be prohibited depending on what the environment is like. Malcolm Gladwell, provides evidence throughout his entire essay that explains The Power of Context. The Power of Context indicates that the situation people are in has an effect on how they act wherever they are at. For example many people believe that if children are raised in a bad neighborhood where there is gang bangers, drug dealers, crimes happening every day, and people doing bad things, then in the future that person will become a criminal/ bad person. Gladwell shows several experiments like the broken windows theory, the zimbardo experiment and more to support his argument.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout life, people are always seeking something, whether it is discovering solutions to satisfy desires or seeking the purpose of life. However, the recognition and fulfillment of one's true self-are the hardest things in the world simply because one always seems certain of him or herself, and is strongly influenced by his or her surroundings. In his essay, “The Power of Context,” Malcolm Gladwell says that human behavior is susceptible to and strongly predisposed by the environment in which they live. He further poses that, "epidemics are sensitive to the surroundings and situation of the places and times in which they transpire." The essay extensively states that the features of one’s current social and physical…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tipping Point

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When referring to the Power of Context, Gladwell states the theory and the facts to support it. The theory that follows the Power of Context is that “…the convictions of your heart and the actual contents of your thoughts are less important, in the end, in guiding your actions than the immediate context of you behavior” (Gladwell 165). Ultimately, no matter what a person’s regular behavior is, as soon as his or her immediate context is altered, his or her behavior is altered also. The fact that goes along to support it is the study done by two psychologists that is based on research and actual events. The students who were on their way to talk about Good Samaritans “…literally stepped over the victim…” (Gladwell 165). To the reader’s astonishment, the students who presented the ideas of a Good Samaritan were not the ones who stopped to help the beaten victim. In fact, the students who stopped and the students who didn’t stop were separated into two groups: the ones who were rushing, and the ones who had time. It would seem logical to think that the speakers who were on their way to speak about Good Samaritans would stop. However, the use of this study, which is an example of logos, only shows the reader the strength of the Power of Context and also makes the reader more prone to believing it.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Power of Context

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Malcolm Gladwell’s “The Power of Context,” Gladwell states that actions that people commit, whether good or bad, are influenced by the nature of the situation more than their actual intentions. The psychological tendency for our minds to morph mannerisms and behavioral information into character explains the “context” portion of Gladwell’s theory. Gladwell wanted to prove his theory that by applying his “Power of Context” theory into the numerous incidents and experiments that were conducted in history. Throughout history, experiments showed that there was a strong correlation between the changes in context with the changes in character. In modern society, people often take impromptu action and abandon their responsibilities as a law-abiding citizen when in a critical situation because the Power of Context states that the human behavior is strongly influenced by its environment.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The focal purpose of the article ‘Americans get an ‘F’ in religion’ by Cathy Lynn Grossman is to explain how ignorant Americans are when it comes to other religions around the world and their own. Religion is a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs; a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons and sects. Being ignorant to something as vital as religion scares the author of this article because religion is not only all of the actualities stated in the preceding sentence but it is what motivates the people around us and why they behave as they do. Additionally, Grossman’s purpose of writing this article is to inform the readers that being ignorant about something that is this heavily weighted is not okay. This article was written in the year 2007; as a result the context has relevance and can still be comprehended and understood the same way today. The reason being that the article can still be construed the same way six years after it was written is because Americans still aren’t as knowledgeable as they should be about the religions of the world, their peers, or their own.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Common belief in todays society would most likely base an individuals behavior on factors such as genes, upbringing, personal convictions, a persons history, personality, etc. These factors seem like reasonable and logical conclusions, but which is most significant? Is there anything missing? Malcolm Gladwell, a writer for The New Yorker and author of The Tipping Point: How Little Things Make a Big Difference, has a special desire to come up with an answer to this question. In the chapter “The Power of Context: Bernie Goetz and the Rise and Fall of New York City Crime” Gladwell examines this interesting question and comes up with an answer of his own. According to Gladwell the different conclusions listed above do play a role in determining how one behaves but are not the most significant factors. Gladwell believes that the immediate environment has the most significant influence on ones behavior, also referred to as his Power of Context theory. Although Gladwell understands that this theory might sound a bit crazy to most he stands by his belief by offering different means, both directly and indirectly, to help persuade his readers into accepting this “radical idea”.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dershowitz, Alan M. Shouting fire: civil liberties in a turbulent age. Boston: Little, Brown, 2002: 205-211…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power of Context

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most people would believe that we are shaped and defined by our values and moral character. However, Malcolm Gladwell argues, in the chapter “The Power of Context, Bernie Goetz and the Rise and Fall of New York City Crime” In other words, The Power of Context is the social setting and or the environment around you and how it affects your behavior. Anticipating resistance from the reader Gladwell uses rhetorical strategies such as real life examples, controlled experiments and theories to help advance his claim and to help persuade the reader to side with his argument.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contextualism in Bible

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the biggest debates between Christians is how to read the Bible. By understanding what He meant by what He said, one can fulfill God’s will. There are various interpretations to His words. Contextualism, in the Bible, refers to interpreting text in context to which the Bible was written. From a contextualist view, because there are many books that come from various years, the reader must take into account the historical context at the time the book was written. Also, the reader must take into account the social, political, and theological context in order to get meaning from text. Contextualists also believe that God is the author of the Bible, through the words of human authors. When reading interpretations of scripture, it is easy to notice whether the interpretations have a contextual view or a literal view. One can also see the pros and cons of contextualism in its practice.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russian Prime Minister Joseph Stalin once said, "A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic." The impersonalization of war and death that he shares is an realistic characterization of war; originally intending to improve the lives of people, yet inevitably leading to the destruction of human life. Author Kurt Vonnegut endorses this view in his novel Slaughterhouse-Five; he shows that war can never be justified as long as innocent life is lost. Throughout Slaughterhouse-Five, Vonnegut explores the theme of free will in order to illustrate the absurdity of war. Vonnegut conveys this through setting, characters, structure, and style.…

    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Context changes due to audience, writers and time; though it still has the effect of influencing perspectives and creating/ reshaping meaning. Through the context, us as readers are able to establish an understanding of the time period, the writer and the purpose of the text. Through the exploration of both contexts relationships are established to enrich and illuminate connections on the unchanging nature and universality of certain values, ideas and language forms, also highlighting through implicit or explicit means relationships, writing and societal changes. Connections are…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to choose between good and evil is one simple choice that separates a human from being a machine. Being unable to choose from the two is “…like little chellovecks made out of tin and with a spring inside and then a winding handle on the outside” (Burgess, 203). There comes a point in a man’s life where he stops being a machine and becomes something else entirely. In the book A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess, the twenty-first chapter was excluded from the earlier publications, but then added to the latter ones; although the ending of chapter twenty provides beneficial lessons, the twenty-first chapter of A Clockwork Orange…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Notes for Eng100

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the introduction to section 5 of Convergences, entitled “Dividing Lines,” Robert Atwan discusses the adversarial model of American cultural conversations. The sides are identified with labels like conservative/liberal, Republican/Democrat, white/black, and religious/secular. These labels sometimes simplify complicated issues and prevent us from reaching a compromise, but these types of arguments and debates are also used to determine how power is distributed and problems solved in our communities. While we may not have the individual power needed to solve a community dilemma, we do have the power to write and argue and convince others of our views in an attempt to solve these problems. In this assignment you will argue about one of the issues from Convergences. You may argue against or in conjunction with the texts. Identify an issue about which you want to argue, use two texts from the book and one outside source of any type (book, article, website, documentary, etc), and argue for a particular view and/or resolution of the issue.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    No discussion of postmodernism in literature can avoid beginning and ending without examining the truth and understanding of the role of God. In the philosophical and psychological contributions of Sigmund Freud, his views on social conflict, and individual suffering resulted in his theories on the state of mental health and its effect on individuals in the face of culture and religion. Through practicing such theories of psychoanalysis and the unconscious, he pursued and cured fears in many of his patients. Yet, ironically in his statement above, it became evident from his philosophical work, Civilization and its Discontents, that he concluded many social sanctions around devotion to religion as well as the social rules and social structures were somewhat protective against changing away from suffering and conflict. His observation inferred that faith and devotion were intended to deflect the truth of irrationality and uncertainty in the world, and Christianity provided comfort. It required a leap of faith, as demonstrated by a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns in Christian knowledge; eventually it lead people to have an inability to question what they were told from the disseminators of the truth of the words of God. Freud’s writings reflected that no matter how much negative social conditions like war, poverty, and crime became tragic and severe, for 2000 years Christianity readily supplied…

    • 4269 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Context and Meaning

    • 584 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Books, articles, newspapers etc. also contain a wide variety of text types and language styles not easily found in conventional teaching materials. They can encourage reading for pleasure because they are likely to contain topics of interest to learners, especially if students are given the chance to have a say about the topics or kinds of authentic materials to be used in class.…

    • 584 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays