Using Animals in Research Shouldn’t Be Forbidden

USING ANIMALS IN RESEARCH SHOULDN’T BE FORBIDDEN Nowadays, many scientific researchers use many animals for their experiments, which has become a very controversial subject among scientists, government officials, and citizens. Differences of opinion have emerged on this issue over time in the world. Although some people who are generally animal right activists argue that animals shouldn’t be used in scientific researchers and this should be totally banned, others don’t agree with the some idea for the sake of human life. In my opinion, using animals in scientific experiments shouldn’t be exactly forbidden for humanity and science. To begin with, animals should be used in research for human life. Every day, thousands of people are saved from painful diseases and death by powerful medical drugs and treatments. These incredible inventions of medicine wouldn’t be possible without animal testing because animals are similar to humans in terms of common genes. Scientists observe to find out how new drugs and virus affect animals by using them in medicine researches and animal reactions can help predict how humans will react to a substance. For example, treatments for cancer and HIV, antibiotics, insulin for diabetics, and vaccines have all been developed though animal research. Without animal testing, the development of these products would have required extensive human testing. As a result, if new finding chance on humans rather than animals or the experiment was never done, this could cost in human life because we don’t know what the outcome would be. Secondly, using animals in research shouldn’t be forbidden for science. When a new technique tested on something which should have common genes, this research would be a scientific experiment at that time. A non-scientific invention or research without evaluating and trial will not serve to people because their lives can run a risk. However, something should be produced or