Uses of Force Policy
Uses of Force Policy
Furman Glass
Colorado Technical University Online Prof. Blair D. Ettinger
CJUS483-1301A-01
January 14, 2013
Abstract
Numerous authorized and program limitations control the use of force by law enforcement, starting with the 4th Amendment’s prevention against arbitrary searches and seizures and decentralizing downhill to state decrees and departmental guidelines that manage how and under what circumstances police officer may use force. In most police agencies at present, the use of force is closely regulated by guidelines, and more critical employments of force are evaluated and/or examined by directorial staffs or internal affairs sections. Whenever the law enforcement agency or a defendant uses force, there is a likelihood of harm. Until lately, a small amount was known concerning the incidence, reasons, or associates of force- linked damages. Over the previous few epochs, there have been progressions in preparation and knowledge with the purpose of decreasing the regularity and seriousness of injuries to the law enforcement agency and the community while sustaining the protected and real control over fighting accused.
Along with use of force continuum the California Highway Patrol (CHP) has continuously had a well-made procedure concerning the use of force; nevertheless, the situations encompassing the Rodney King event triggered a reappraisal of this guidelines, for not merely the CHP, but also countless other police organizations all through the nation. Seventy-five percent of attackers who confrontation Highway Patrol officers depend on hands and feet. The CHP answer is practically always something other than a sidearm, at the beginning - while use of a firearm is not prohibited if conditions command (California, 2013). Regrettably, the instructing simulants used by countless police departments introduce typical "shoot / don 't shoot" circumstances that discount the more mainstream conflicts when a revolver is not a
Furman Glass
Colorado Technical University Online Prof. Blair D. Ettinger
CJUS483-1301A-01
January 14, 2013
Abstract
Numerous authorized and program limitations control the use of force by law enforcement, starting with the 4th Amendment’s prevention against arbitrary searches and seizures and decentralizing downhill to state decrees and departmental guidelines that manage how and under what circumstances police officer may use force. In most police agencies at present, the use of force is closely regulated by guidelines, and more critical employments of force are evaluated and/or examined by directorial staffs or internal affairs sections. Whenever the law enforcement agency or a defendant uses force, there is a likelihood of harm. Until lately, a small amount was known concerning the incidence, reasons, or associates of force- linked damages. Over the previous few epochs, there have been progressions in preparation and knowledge with the purpose of decreasing the regularity and seriousness of injuries to the law enforcement agency and the community while sustaining the protected and real control over fighting accused.
Along with use of force continuum the California Highway Patrol (CHP) has continuously had a well-made procedure concerning the use of force; nevertheless, the situations encompassing the Rodney King event triggered a reappraisal of this guidelines, for not merely the CHP, but also countless other police organizations all through the nation. Seventy-five percent of attackers who confrontation Highway Patrol officers depend on hands and feet. The CHP answer is practically always something other than a sidearm, at the beginning - while use of a firearm is not prohibited if conditions command (California, 2013). Regrettably, the instructing simulants used by countless police departments introduce typical "shoot / don 't shoot" circumstances that discount the more mainstream conflicts when a revolver is not a
References: STATE CROWE v. MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, No. WD 64374. (Missouri Court of Appeals,Western District. August 02, 2005). California, S. o. (2013). California Highway Patrol. Retrieved from http://www.chp.ca.gov/programs/fots.html Cole & Gertz. (2013). The Criminal Justice System, Politics and Policies. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Cengage learning. Police, I. S. (2011, AUGUST 25). OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTINGS / LETHAL INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS. Retrieved from http://www.icgov.org/site/CMSv2/File/police/generalOrders/genorder40.pdf .