Use of Knowledge

Topics: High school, Private school, Public school Pages: 28 (8776 words) Published: December 17, 2012
Heterogeneous effects from school competition:
New evidence from Norway
Hans Bonesrønninga, , Linn Renée Naperb
aNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
bCentre for Economic Research at NTNU, Norway

Date of submission: February 12., 2008

Abstract: We examine whether potential competition effects from private schools differ across student subgroups in Norwegian public schools. Competition is measured by the share of students attending private schools. This measure is potentially endogenous to student achievement, and is treated by IV estimation. Sorting of parents across municipalities is considered by exploiting the location of universities and colleges. Indications of non-uniform competition effects are provided: while there is no evidence that students with less educated parents gain from competition, the effect for students with highly educated parents is positive. The exact size and significance level of the effect for the latter subgroup is hard to pin down.

Keywords: school competition; private schools; student achievement JEL-classifications: I21, H42

1. Introduction
There are two major ways charter schools might improve the average student achievement in an economy: by being better than public schools; and by improving the performance in public schools by introducing more school competition. The present paper evaluates the second effect. It is a controversial issue whether school competition will work as intended. From a theoretical point of view, the nature of competition between schools is not clear-cut: The education market seems to be a differentiated product market, where schools differ in their characteristics and where parental preferences over school characteristics differ. One conjecture is therefore that the degree and character of competition will vary with the characteristics of both suppliers and demanders. Not surprisingly then, the existing empirical literature on school competition – between public and private schools or between public schools – does not provide any sweeping and clear-cut conclusions (see for instance, Hoxby 1994, 2000, Dee 1998, Fiske and Ladd 2001, Levačić 2004, Bettinger 2005, Sandstrøm and Bergstrøm, 2005, Bayer and McMillan, 2005, Gibbons, Machin and Silva, 2005, Hsieh and Urquiola, 2006, Card, Dooley and Payne, 2006).

The present paper adds to the existing literature by providing empirical evidence from Norway. First, we investigate whether the overall performance of public schools in Norway is affected by competition from private schools. Thereafter, we ask whether the competition effects differ across student subgroups. Our hypothesis is that principals and teachers within public schools might realize that they can influence parental school choices by reallocating resources and/or attention towards the students they think are most likely to opt out. The incentives to reallocate resources or attention might vary with the attractiveness of the most mobile students (it is not unlikely that mobility and attractiveness is correlated). Thus, if the public sector actors’ responses to competition are to reallocate resources between student subgroups, we expect the attractive and mobile student subgroups to gain, and the less attractive and less mobile students, to lose from competition.

The private school sector in Norway is small, and has some distinct characteristics. Most privately owned schools are religious schools or schools with an alternative pedagogy, reflecting the Private School Law of 1970 which offers only these kinds of private schools public funding. Private schools are offered (almost) free of charge to the students. The municipalities experience a decrease in their budgets when students exit for private schools; implying that the financing of private schools very much portrays a voucher system. Private schools are not allowed to discriminate between applicants, but the rules that can be applied when schools are...

References: Aardal, B., Valen, H., Karlsen, R., Kleven. Ø. and Normann, T.M. (2003) ‘Valgundersøkelsen 2001’. Report 2003/14, Statistics Norway
Ahlin, Å
Barrow, L. (2007) ‘Private School Location and Neighborhood Characteristics.’ Economics of Education Review, forthcoming
Bayer, P
NBER Working paper No. 11802, November 2005.
Bettinger, E. (2005) ‘The Effect of Charter Schools on Charter Students and Public Schools.’
Economics of Education Review
Card, D., Dooley, M. and Payne, A.A. (2006) ‘School Competition with Publicly-Funded
Catholic Schools: Evidence on Student Mobility and Achievement.’ Unpublished manuscript
Dee, T.S. (1998) ‘Competition and the Quality of Public Schools. Economics of Education
Review, Vol 17, 419-427
Figlio, D.N. and Stone, J.A. (2001) ‘Can Public Policy Affect Private School Cream Skimming?’ Journal of Urban Economics, Vol 49, 240-266.
Gibbons, S, S. Machin, S and Silva, O. (2005) ‘Competition, Choice and Pupil
Achievement.’ Working paper
Glomm, G., Harris, D. and Lo, Te-Fen (2005) ‘Charter School Location.’ Economics of Education Review, Vol 24, 451-457.
Hanushek E. A. (2002) ‘Publicly provided education.’ In: Auerbach, A.J., Feldstein, M. (Eds.), Handbook in Public Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2045-2141.
Hanushek, E. A. and Rivkin, S.G. (2003) ‘Does Public School Competition Affect Teacher
Quality?’ In: Hoxby, C.M
Hoxby, C.M. (1994) Do Private Schools Provide Competition for Public Schools? NBER
Working Paper no
Hoxby, C.M. (2000) ‘Does Competition Among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers?’ American Economic Review, Vol. 90, 1209-1238 (December 2000).
Hsieh, C.T. and Urquiola, M. (2006) ‘The Effects of generalized School Choice on Achievement and Stratification: Evidence from Chile’s Voucher Program.’ Journal of Public Economics, Vol 90, 1477-1503
Ladd, H
Levačić, R. (2004) ‘Competition and the Performance of English Secondary Schools: Further
Evidence.’ Education Economics, Vol 12, 177-193.
Moulton, B.R. (1986) ‘Random Group Effects and the Precision of Regression Estimates.’ Journal of Econometrics, Vol 32, 385-397.
Newmark, C. M. (1995) ‘Another Look at Whether Private Schools Influence Public School Quality.’ Public Choice , Vol 82, 365-373.
Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E.A., and Kain, J.F. (2005) ‘Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement.’ Econometrica, Vol 73, 417-458.
Sandstrøm, F.M., and Bergstrøm, F. (2005) ’School Vouchers in Practice: Competition Will Not Hurt You.’ Journal of Public Economics, Vol 89, 351-380.
Wikstrøm, C., and Wikstrøm, M. (2005) ’Grade Inflation and School Competition: an Empirical Analysis Based on the Swedish Upper Secondary Schools. Economics of Education Review, Vol 24, 251-267
APPENDIX
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Use of Reason in the Areas of Knowledge Essay
  • Knowledge Essay
  • Knowledge Essay
  • Theory of Knowledge Essay
  • knowledge management Essay
  • Knowledge Essay
  • Essay on The Use of Knowledge in Society
  • Essay on Knowledge Management: Nursing and the Use of Information Technology

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free