United States V. Lee (1982)

Topics: Faith, First Amendment to the United States Constitution, Employment Pages: 2 (426 words) Published: February 18, 2013

United States v. Lee (1982)
This case involved a conflict between the beliefs of the Old Order Amish and government regulations on employment and Social Security. The Amish regard the care of the sick and elderly to be one of their religious obligations; as a consequence, they believe that paying Social Security taxes (designed to care for the sick and elderly) would entail acknowledging that the government had that task rather than they. Thus, paying Social Security taxes would mean denying an important aspect of their faith. Lee, an Amish employer, employed other Amish to work on his farm and in his carpentry shop, but failed to withhold social security taxes from his employees or to pay the employer's share of such taxes. The IRS assessed him for back taxes and Lee sued, arguing that the requirement to pay Social Security taxes infringed upon his right to the free exercise of his religion. Court Decision

Although Congress had exempted Amish employees from participation in the Social Security program in order to accommodate their religious beliefs, the Supreme Court refused to extend this exemption by allowing Amish employers to also avoid Social Security taxes. Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Burger offered two arguments as a basis for this decision. First, pointed out that the Congressional exemption was only for self-employed Amish, not Amish who employed others; therefore, that exemption could not be construed as being applicable here. Second, although Burger agreed that Lee's religious beliefs were sincerely held, it simply was not true that all burdens on religion are necessarily unconstitutional. So long as the government can demonstrate a compelling interest, it could be permissible for it to create a limitation on religious liberty: The tax system could not function if denominations were allowed to challenge it because tax payments were spent in a manner that violates their religious belief. Because the broad public interest in maintaining...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay about Arizona V United States
  • Essay on Braswell V. United States
  • Essay on United States V. Nixon
  • Korematsu V. United States Essay
  • The United States of Immigrants Essay
  • Adversary System in United States Research Paper
  • Henderson V. United States of America Essay
  • Schenck v. United States 1919 Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free