Preview

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4396 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law
A/CN.9/SER.C/ABSTRACTS/105

United Nations

General Assembly

Distr.: General
16 February 2011
English
Original: Spanish

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law
CASE LAW ON UNCITRAL TEXTS
(CLOUT)

Contents
Page

Cases relating to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International
Sale of Goods (CISG) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3

Case 1033: CISG 14; 15; 16; 74; 75; 77 - Spain: Murcia Provincial High Court
(15 July 2010) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3

Case 1034: CISG 8 - Spain: Cáceres Provincial High Court (14 July 2010) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4

Case 1035: CISG 35 - Spain: Barcelona Provincial High Court (27 January 2010) . . . . . . . . . .

4

Case 1036: CISG 7; 35.1; 35.2; 38; 39; 40; 46; 47; 48; 77; 86; 87; 88 - Spain: Zaragoza
Provincial High Court (31 March 2009) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4

Case 1037: CISG 25; 30; 31; 34; 35; 37; 38; 39; 48; 50 - Spain: Barcelona Provincial High
Court (24 March 2009) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6

Case 1038: CISG 1.1 (a); 39; 53; 59; 78 - Spain: Valencia Provincial High Court
(8 April 2008) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6

Case 1039: CISG 7; 8; 8.1; 8.3; 25; 26; 39; 46; 49.1 (a) - Spain: Navarra Provincial High
Court, Section 3 (27 December 2007)

7

Case 1040: CISG [14.1; 15.1; 18.1; 23; 24; 25; 30;] 39.1; [78] - Spain: Cuenca Provincial
High Court (31 January 2005) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief
    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Case Brief

    NOTICE: [***1] THESE ARE NOT OFFICIAL HEADNOTES OR SYLLABI AND ARE NEITHER APPROVED IN ADVANCE NOR ENDORSED BY THE COURT. PLEASE REVIEW THE CASE IN FULL.…

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rochin Case Summary
    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rochin Case Summary

    It is hard to tell what the future holds in respect to the justice system since it is not often determined by one’s intentions, but the events people encounter as they purse their goals. Therefore, the decision of this case may affect a criminal justice professional I the sense he or she might want to maintain a strong and focused philosophy. This may involve the consideration of both crime control and due process models when dealing with some cases because the use of the two appears to be the best strategy to deal with crime in the…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitutional Review- Two Distinct Approaches
    • 2886 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Constitutional Review- Two Distinct Approaches

    Ministry of Justice of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Netherlands. Legislationline. (2003). [25 April 2007].…

    • 2886 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retard
    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Retard

    (d) The case: (12 marks) • What happened in this case? (1 mark) Summarise the facts. PLEASE BE CAREFUL NOT TO SIMPLY RE-WRITE OR RE-STATE THE FACTS. What is required is a BRIEF summary, in your own words. What was the decision in the case? (1 mark) Identify and explain the main legal issue or issues of the case in your own words. (10 marks) NOTE: this part of the question will require students to do some reading and to conduct some independent research beyond the case and beyond the prescribed textbook. Please see the attached Guidelines for this Assignment, as well as the Research Guidance Notes for Assignment 1 on Blackboard to help you with your research.) 3. Please include footnotes AND a bibliography (list of references at the end of your assignment). Please note footnotes and the bibliography will NOT be included in the word limit. NOTE: You should also refer to the Course Outline (section 4) regarding Assessment Format (paragraph 4.3), Assignment Submission Procedure (paragraph 4.4) and penalty for late submission (paragraph 4.5).…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison
    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marbury Vs Madison

    In order to examine the historical and political significance of this case, it is fundamental to review the political discourse of the period in conjunction with case facts, notes, and finally, the decision. This assists us in our understanding of this benchmark case in completeness.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    R V Bilal Skaf, Legal Studies Research Report
    • 2795 Words
    • 12 Pages

    R V Bilal Skaf, Legal Studies Research Report

    Legal citation of the case: Regina v Bilal Skaf; Regina v Mohammed Skaf [2006] NSWSC 394, 28 July 2006 AND amendment to this decision with the appeal: R v Skaf & Skaf [2008] NSWCCA 303, 17 December 2008…

    • 2795 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Applied Management Project
    • 13570 Words
    • 55 Pages

    Applied Management Project

    17. Tsang (1999), “Law society Gazette-Focus ' '. Available at www.lawgazette.co.uk/archives/1999-10-08/00000012.html, (Accessed: 27th July, 2010)…

    • 13570 Words
    • 55 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice for the Creation of the State Liability Doctrine
    • 2511 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice for the Creation of the State Liability Doctrine

    ** Cases C-46 and 48/93 Brasserie du Pecheur v. Germany and Factortame v. UK (Factortame III) [1996] ECR I-1029…

    • 2511 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    MLC707 Assignment T3 2014
    • 1867 Words
    • 6 Pages

    MLC707 Assignment T3 2014

     Some students will merely refer to the principles in Amadio case to support their…

    • 1867 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    National Enquirer
    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    National Enquirer

    1162, 1168 (11th Cir. 2005); Posner v. Essex Ins. Co., Ltd., 178 F.3d 1209 (11th…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Lawsuit
    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Lawsuit

    Work cited: Najera, Bryan. "Bryan Najera Eng 1B." : THE LAWSUIT by Naguib Mahfouz. N.p., 15 Nov. 2010. Web. 04 June 2013.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Spousal Compellability? Support for Marriage or Complete Myth
    • 2217 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Spousal Compellability? Support for Marriage or Complete Myth

    Hamer v United Kingdom App no 7114/75 (ECHR 13 December 1979); (1982) 4 E.H.R.R 139…

    • 2217 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    R. V. Vaillancourt
    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    R. V. Vaillancourt

    This is a formal request for an appeal against the ruling in the case of R . v. Vaillancourt. . Mr. Vaillancourt seeks to appeal the court’s decision based on the inconsistency with s.230(d) of the Criminal Code, and s. 7 and 11 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This is present in this case, evident when Vaillancourt’s accomplice does not inform him of his plan to bring weapons to the crime scene, leading Vaillancourt to believe that his lack of knowledge of the presence of weapons should not constitute section 230 (d), as he believes that it imposes a certain degree of absolute criminal liability when it shouldn’t apply, as Vaillancourt had no mens rea present.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Case History of de Vera vs. de Vera - A Bigamy Case
    • 15570 Words
    • 63 Pages

    Case History of de Vera vs. de Vera - A Bigamy Case

    Petitioner, Rosario T. de Vera, filed a bigamy case against her spouse Geren A. de Vera and Josephine F. Juliano after allegedly contracting a second marriage with the latter, which likewise has previous knowledge that accused he is still validly married to petitioner. Accused Geren pleaded guilty on arraignment but prayed on a latter motion that he be allowed to withdraw it in order to avail of the mitigating circumstance of voluntary surrender. Said motion was opposed by petitioner arguing that it shouldn’t be entertained for the case is already for promulgation and that not all the elements of voluntary surrender is present. The RTC granted the motion and held the accused guilty of bigamy but likewise appreciated the mitigating circumstances of voluntary surrender and plea of guilty in the determination of the penalty to be imposed. Petitioner moved for the partial reconsideration of the case which was denied. In 2005, Geren applied for probation which was favorably acted upon and referred to the probation office of San Juan. Petitioner filed a special civil action in the appellate court which affirmed the decision of the RTC and ruled that all the mitigating circumstance of voluntary surrender were present.…

    • 15570 Words
    • 63 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TATEL VS virac
    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    TATEL VS virac

    Petitioner Celestino Tatel owns a warehouse in barrio Sta. Elena, Municipality of Virac. Complaints were received by the municipality concerning the disturbance caused by the operation of the abaca bailing machine inside petitioner's warehouse. A committee was then appointed by the municipal council, and it noted from its investigation on the matter that an accidental fire within the warehouse of the petitioner created a danger to the lives and properties of the people in the neighborhood. Resolution No. 29 was then passed by the Municipal council declaring said warehouse as a public nuisance within a purview of Article 694 of the New Civil Code. According to respondent municipal officials, petitioner's warehouse was constructed in violation of Ordinance No. 13, series of 1952, prohibiting the construction of warehouses near a block of houses either in the poblacion or barrios without maintaining the necessary distance of 200 meters from said block of houses to avoid loss of lives and properties by accidental fire. On the other hand, petitioner contends that Ordinance No. 13 is unconstitutional.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics