Unit 8 Psychology 
Unit 8 Psychological Perspectives in Health and Social Care
Task Two (m2)
In this essay, I will be comparing and evaluating two psychological approaches to health and social care provision. I have chosen behaviourism and psychodynamic to evaluate the similarities and differences and relate them to health and social care.
Behaviourism
The Behaviourism approach differs from psychodynamic greatly, because behaviourism is founded on observation, physical stimuli and responses that are somewhat measureable by using many experiments to support its theories. Furthermore, behaviourists use science to analyze everything and regard seeing as believing. Compared to psychodynamic that is based on assumptions, it is more of a leap of faith than a science as there is no hard evidence to support its theories. In addition, psychodynamic approach criticises behaviourists as it does not accept that the unconscious mind influences behaviour.
Find out more from UK Essays here: http://www.ukessays.com/essays/psychology/similarities-and-differences-in-the-approaches-to-psychology-psychology-essay.php#ixzz3O4OUhMwJ
The psychodynamic approach takes into account both nature and nurture, however the cognitive approach has failed to recognise the influence of nature and nurture. Freud claimed that adult personality is the product of innate drives (nature) and childhood experiences (nurture). These innate drives include the structure of the personality, Id, ego and superego as well as the psychosexual development every child passes through. If a child does not pass through these processes successfully it could lead to abnormalities in behaviour. The cognitive approach has carried out research into intelligence but has not looked at the influence of genes in its research or environmental factors (such as wealth) that could influence intelligence. Therefore this clearly indicates that both approaches are different in terms of nature and nurture. The cognitive approach is useful and has
Task Two (m2)
In this essay, I will be comparing and evaluating two psychological approaches to health and social care provision. I have chosen behaviourism and psychodynamic to evaluate the similarities and differences and relate them to health and social care.
Behaviourism
The Behaviourism approach differs from psychodynamic greatly, because behaviourism is founded on observation, physical stimuli and responses that are somewhat measureable by using many experiments to support its theories. Furthermore, behaviourists use science to analyze everything and regard seeing as believing. Compared to psychodynamic that is based on assumptions, it is more of a leap of faith than a science as there is no hard evidence to support its theories. In addition, psychodynamic approach criticises behaviourists as it does not accept that the unconscious mind influences behaviour.
Find out more from UK Essays here: http://www.ukessays.com/essays/psychology/similarities-and-differences-in-the-approaches-to-psychology-psychology-essay.php#ixzz3O4OUhMwJ
The psychodynamic approach takes into account both nature and nurture, however the cognitive approach has failed to recognise the influence of nature and nurture. Freud claimed that adult personality is the product of innate drives (nature) and childhood experiences (nurture). These innate drives include the structure of the personality, Id, ego and superego as well as the psychosexual development every child passes through. If a child does not pass through these processes successfully it could lead to abnormalities in behaviour. The cognitive approach has carried out research into intelligence but has not looked at the influence of genes in its research or environmental factors (such as wealth) that could influence intelligence. Therefore this clearly indicates that both approaches are different in terms of nature and nurture. The cognitive approach is useful and has