Unifying Principles of

Topics: Organizational studies, Organizational culture, Management, Organization / Pages: 41 (10018 words) / Published: Aug 30th, 2010
UNIFYING PRINCIPLES OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND MANAGEMENT

ABSTRACT Theories and models of organizational behavior and management continue to increase in number and complexity. While much of the recent research has not made its way into standard business textbooks, these textbooks nonetheless offer a broad array of topics and concepts that can easily overwhelm both student and practitioner. No common thread appears to link these disparate topics, despite the fact that variations on the same theory often can be found across topics. This paper describes four underlying principles of organizational behavior and management that distill and synthesize essential features of many of the established theories and models. Each principle is described in terms of two concepts, which can be viewed as dichotomous, continuous, or paradoxical measures of the principle, and applied independently or in combination to explain representative theories. The implications of these underlying principles for teaching organizational behavior and management as well as for conducting organizational analyses are discussed.

INTRODUCTION For several decades, business schools have offered introductory courses in management principles, organizational theory, and organizational behavior. One or more of these courses is generally among the eight to ten required/core courses in a bachelors or masters degree in business. These management courses draw from a wide variety of sciences, including psychology, sociology, social psychology, anthropology, political science, and systems theory. Concepts and theories from both pure and applied science are introduced to help explain the nature of life in organizations in terms of personality, motivation, communication, planning and control, decision making, leadership, power, conflict, job design, teambuilding, organizational design, organizational culture, and change (Miner, 2002). In part because these topics are drawn from so many



References: Alderfer, C.P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth: Human needs in organizational settings Christensen, C.M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail Denison, D.R., Hart, S.L., & Kahn, J.A. (1996). From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model Duncan, R. (1979). What is the right organization structure? Decision tree analysis provides the answer Freud, S. (1965). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. New York: Norton. Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking. Greiner, L.E. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 50, 37-46. Hackman, J.R. & Oldham, G.R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K.H. (1969). Life cycle theory of leadership. Training and Development Journal, 23 (2), 26-34. Hofstede, G.H. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill. Janis, I.L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Jung, C.G. (1933). Psychological types. New York: Harcourt. Kelley, H.H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128. Kerr, S. (1977). Substitutes for leadership: Some implications for organizational design. Kolhberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row. Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396. McClelland, D.C. (1984). Motives, personality, and society: Selected papers. New York: Praeger. McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill. Miner, J.B. (2002). Organizational behavior: Foundations, theories, and analyses. New York: Oxford University Press. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Poole, M.S. & Van de Ven, A.H. (1989). Using a paradox to build management and organization theories Porter, L.W. & Lawler, E.E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin. Segal, N.L. (2000). Entwined lives: Twins and what they tell us about human behavior. New York: Plume. Smith, K.K. & Berg, D.N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics Tuckman, B.W. & Jensen, M.A.C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2 (3), 419-427. Van Gundy, A.B. (1992). Idea power: Techniques and resources to unleash the creativity in your organization Volkema, R.J. (1999). The negotiation toolkit. New York: AMACOM. Vroom, V.H. & Jago, A.G. (1988). The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Unifying Germany
  • Unifying Greece
  • Elements Unifying a Report
  • Miranda: The Unifying Force in the Tempest
  • Religion: A Unifying Force in History
  • The Unifying Kerygma of the New Testament
  • Unifying River in Huck Finn
  • Unifying Is The Human Condition Research
  • Vijnanabhiksu: Unifying Hinduism And Indian History
  • “Migration”-Diversifying or Unifying the Cultural Landscape