Preview

Understanding Company Law 16 Edition

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
41100 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Understanding Company Law 16 Edition
The Students’ Answers in this document are for the questions in the below textbook (which can be borrowed in Beanland Library):

Additional information for this title

Main Title:

Understanding company law / Phillip Lipton, Abe Herzberg, Michelle Welsh.
Author:

Lipton, P. (Phillip)
Herzberg, A. (Abraham)
Welsh, Michelle
Edition:

16th ed.
Imprint:

Pyrmont, N.S.W. : Thomson Reuters, c2012.
Collation:

viii, 987 p.; 26 cm.
Notes:

Previous ed.: 2010.
"The 16th edition incorporates a number of significant recent amendments to legislation and case law. These include: Personal Property Securities (Corporations and Other Amendments) Act 2011 [...], Corporations Amendment (Financial Market Supervision) Act 2010 [...], Corporations Amendment (Corporate Reporting Reform) Act 2011 [...], Corporations Amendment (Sons of Gwalia) Act 2011 [...], Corporations Amendment (Improving Accountability on Director and Executive Remuneration) Act 2011 [...]. This edition also includes a number of important cases, the most significant of which are Morley v ASIC and ASIC v Healey, dealing with directors' duty of care." -- Back cover.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:

9780455230054 (pbk)
Dewey Class:

346.940 66
Language:

English
Subject:

Corporation law -- Australia
Average Rating:

No reviews available as yet
Add your review
BRN:

33069

Holdings:
Location
Collection
Call Number
Status/Desc
Beanland Library (HCMC)
Commerce - Accountancy
346.940 66 L767 2012

Beanland Library (HCMC)
Commerce - Accountancy
346.940 66 L767 2012

Beanland Library (HCMC)
Commerce - Accountancy
346.940 66 L767 2012

Beanland Library (HCMC)
Commerce - Accountancy
346.940 66 L767 2012

Beanland Library (HCMC)
Commerce - Accountancy
346.940 66 L767 2012

Library (Hanoi)
Commerce - Accountancy
346.940 66 L767 2012

Table of Contents

List of Students’ Answers

1. Regulatory Framework 7
2. Registration and Its Effects 8
Question 2 – Page 70 : Raw Student’s Answer 8
Question 3 – Page 70 :

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Ch11-15

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dorris Reed, the plaintiff, purchased a home from Robert King. Robert King and his real estate agent did not tell Dorris Reed that a woman and her four children were murdered 10 years ago, because the murder would affect the value of the home. Dorris Reed, however, did find out about the murder from a neighbor and sued Robert King and his real estate agent for rescission and damages. Dorris Reed paid $76,000 for the home but the value of the house, once the murder was taken into consideration, was only worth $65,000. Due to Dorris Reed failing to state a cause of action, the trial court sided with Robert King and his real estate agent. Dorris Reed appealed. Fraud is being looked at in the case of Reed vs. King. There are five elements to proving fraud, 1) material misrepresentation, 2) facts/knowledge, 3) intent, 4) reliance, and 5) damage (quoted from text book). Robert King and his real estate agent hid the first and second element of fraud. They knew about the murders and did not present Dorris Reed with this information, which would have affected Dorris Reed decision to buy the house. However, when dealing with the selling of real property, the question of materially is the main issue. Materiality is based on three conditions, 1) the gravity of the harm inflicted by nondisclosure, 2) the fairness of imposing a duty of discovery on the buyer as an alternative to compelling disclosure, and 3) the impact on the stability of contracts if rescission is permitted (citation from text book). Even though murder is horrible and it would affect a person’s judgment on buying that particulate house, there is no evidence to support Dorris Reed claim that the murder would in fact affect the market value of the house. The judgment was later reversed because Dorris Reed was able to present enough evidence to show that history can affect the value of property.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business law Ch 4

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    17-3. Daniel is not liable for the debt Rubya defaulted on. The contract did not make Rubya a partner, even those she was given profit sharing and management responsibilities, she did not poses any ownership of the business. Also under UPA 202(c)(3) no presumption of partnership is made since the profits are wages of an employee or for the services of an independent contractor. Not to mention Daniel did not have any knowledge of the credit extended to Rubya.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This question paper may be retained by the candidate There are 14 pages in this exam paper.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Chapter 5 6

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No, Emerson is not liable. Emerson clearly stated that children should be kept away. In the owner’s…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Us Summer Assignment

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Part I: Textbook Assignment. (Use the textbook if you received it in June or download the PDF files or use the dropbox link)…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    company law

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Issue: the issue about company’s constitution and whether the loan contract between ABC bank and Sambal Pty Ltd is invalid.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Breaches of s180-184 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), and Breaches of Common Law and Equitable Principles…

    • 3164 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maths C1

    • 3132 Words
    • 24 Pages

    There are 11 questions in this question paper. The total mark for this paper is 75.…

    • 3132 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Term paper

    • 2359 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Since this text is available electronically, it has NOT been ordered at any of the university textbook stores. Instead, it can be obtained from the following website via three different methods:…

    • 2359 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question 1 – Ideally your answer should be based around the information provided on page 2 of the course materials.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Facts: Mick, Keith, Charlie, Bill and Brian were directors and equal shareholder of Big Lips Music Pty Ltd. Brian resigned his directorship as a result of differences with Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie. The others wanted to get rid of Brian as a shareholder. However, Brian told them that he would never sell his shares in Big Lips Music. A general meeting of Big Lips Music’s shareholders is called at which there is a motion to insert a new clause in the company’s constitution that gives Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie the right to compulsorily acquire Brian’s shares for their issue price. What is the process for inserting a new clause in the company’s constitution? Can Brian prevent the new clause being inserted even thought the others shareholders passed a special resolution that that effect? Required:  Student 1 ‐ Advise the other shareholders of Big Lips Music (the Plaintiffs) what is the process for inserting this new clause in the company’s constitution. If they insert this new clause can they acquire Brian’s shares for the issue price?  Student 2 ‐ Advise Brian (the Defendant) whether he can prevent the new clause being inserted by the other shareholders and if so how? If he can not prevent it will he have to sell his shares for their issue price? Parties The Majority  Mick – Director and shareholder  Keith – Director and shareholder  Charlie – Director and shareholder  Bill – Director and shareholder The Minority  Brian – Shareholder Issues…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    management

    • 1801 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Note: Please refer to Unit Guide for the relevant pages in your textbook, and additional reading for this topic.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company Law

    • 3323 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The information revolution and the advances in technology during the past decades has brought to fore many challenges and issues to both governments and businesses, the age-old crime of espionage or the practice of spying to gather secret information is one the most potential issues facing information-based societies. Although, much has been documented as fact and fiction concerning the traditional foreign agents and spies, in today 's world of multi-national, multi-billion dollar corporations, and industrial espionage is a growing danger. Furthermore, this is aggravated by the fact that many large businesses are physically disseminated which has distributed management and administration, and more job specialization.…

    • 3323 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ciro T, Symes C, Corporations Law in Principle LBC Thomson Reuters, Sydney, 8th edition 2009…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    0309755C you enjoy no also grills distresss you ahead that date. The paper comprises sum…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays