This week’s studies were an examination of organizational and individual barriers to change. We learn to identify the role of strategic renewal, the behavioral aspect of organizational change, analyzed the dynamic of motivating employee behavioral change, differentiated the three faces of change, and finally explored the sources of employee resistance. A primary focus was Lewin’s Field Theory in Social Sciences and for this paper identified three theoretical organization change models.…
Dibella, A.J., 2007. Critical Perceptions of Organisational Change. Journal of Change Management, 7 (3-4), 231-242…
“Because of increasingly dynamic environments, organizations are continually confronted with the need to implement changes in strategy, structure, process, and culture” (Anjani & Dhanapal, 2012, p. 24). Effective change implementation is crucial for the change process to be successful. “Although there are undoubtedly a variety of contributing explanations for the high percentage of failure that occurs in organizational change efforts, management researchers have increasingly concluded that employees play a major role in the success or failure of change in their organizations” (Shin, Taylor, & Seo, 2012, p. 727). Continually assessing employee’s behavior and progress during the implementation phase is crucial to detecting potential pitfalls in the change process. “It is critical that managers be aware of the meaning of the importance of employee commitment to, and behavioral engagement in, organizational change” (Shin, Taylor, & Seo, 2012, p. 742). An employee’s commitment to change can have a significant affect on the process of change implementation. Shin, Taylor, & Seo (2012) states, “we urge managers concerned with change implementation to monitor and closely attend to their employees’ level of change commitment through frequent and open…
change is essential to any establishment so as to survive, remain competitive in today’s market, and for continued success (Anderson and Anderson, 2010; Wittig, 2012). In most literatures (Bovey and Hede, 2001; Yılmaz and Kılıçoğlu, 2013) concerning leadership and management, concept of ‘change’ has been defined as a process which involves going from the known to the unknown. In this regard, it is hard for employees to adapt to change at most organizations (Ravichandran and Piramuthu, 2012), therefore, employee resistance is inevitable, and management must be well equipped to deal with it (Baker, 1989 cited Fine, 1986).…
Organizational change is difficult, although necessary to support growth and excellence in the market place. The concept of change can have negative connotations among employees, especially if change implementations have not been successful in the past. This paper is going to describe the need for change, barriers to change, factors that might influence change, readiness for change, the theoretical change model that relates to the change, and resources that support change implementation.…
One of the reason why employees are resistant to change is lack of understanding around the vision and need for change ("Top Reasons For Change Resistance", n.d.). When people cannot see the reasoning behind something, they seem to be a little more resistant to change. Another reason could be comfort with the status quo and fear of the unknown ("Top Reasons For Change Resistance", n.d.). Some people are just plain out fearful of change and not knowing what to expect. Then there is corporate history and culture ("Top Reasons For Change Resistance", n.d.). Some people do like to be compared to other people of the past. Then there is opposition to the new technologies, requirements and processes introduced by the change ("Top Reasons For Change Resistance", n.d.). Last there is fear of job loss. Employees perceived the business change as a threat to their own job security. Some…
For many years, the world of business has experienced an increasing rate of change. Alvin Toffler (1970) predicted the trend several decades ago. Toffler also noted that people exhibit a natural tendency to resist change. This resistance to change is a major organizational challenge that organizations must learn to manage. As individuals respond to change in different ways, and as variations in responses produce different outcomes the recognition of this resistance to change is an essential step in the development and implementation of effective change management strategies. Change, positive or negative, is unsettling because people seek stability. Certain individuals are more resistant to change than others, at times there can be situational characteristics such as a lack of trust in management contributing to this resistance to change. Often this resistance to change is out of self interest, at stake can be factors such as income, job security, prestige, power, and personal convenience. Low tolerance for change, lack of trust in management, and self interest are all factors which result in resistance to change. However my experience suggests that lack of understanding of the need for change can be the single greatest contributing factor and is the factor which the organization has the greatest control over.…
According to Mcshane & Steen in Canadian Organizational Behaviour, 8th Edition, many people today still resist change as it was reported that 71% of Canadian managers says that their employees resist change (Mcshane & Steen, 410). There are several reasons to the resistance of change among employees and one of the most common factor is related to the direct cost in which…
Generally, the most common threat to successful organizational change is posed by the employees of that organization, as any perceived threat to their self-interests increases the level of resistance they exhibit towards that change. A negative response to organizational change is…
There are several models of change available for use when organizations begin the process of implementing change. The stakeholder analysis model focuses on the position of key stakeholders in regard to the planned change. Stakeholders in a company include individuals or groups inside or outside the company who can influence the success of the change (Palmer, Dunford, and Akin, 2006). This review involves a six step process and includes identifying stakeholders, recognizing the capacity to influence change, checking stakeholder track record, interest in change, ability to affect change, and determine position on change. The main purpose of the stakeholder analysis is to inform the change manager of the likelihood of the change being successful and widely accepted. As a supplement to the analysis, the change manager may use the power-interest matrix to plot the level of stakeholder interest against stakeholder power. The matrix can identify specific action to be taken based on the classification of specific stakeholders. Upon concluding the analysis and power-interest matrix, if the change manager determines weak favorability by key stakeholders, steps can be taken to improve the projection of the change initiative (Palmer, Dunford, and Akin, 2006). The change manager can take action by adding agreeable stakeholders, removing oppositional individuals, or modifying the proposed change to address stakeholder concerns without compromising the initiative. As with all things, there are pros and cons of the stakeholder analysis. A pro is that this analysis is a thorough way to review the business and needs of stakeholders. In addition, it helps to determine the appropriate changes that would benefit the majority. This detailed approach to implementing a change may lead to better results with respect to stakeholder acceptance of the change. A con to…
“we will just offer the new technology along with our existing line and let the customer decide”…
Through this report, yours truly will conduct a thorough analysis to address the different issues associated with resistance to change and come up with answer to the following questions: Why employees are resistant to change? Why employees stay? Why employees leave? How to motivate employees to work and accept the change initiatives? What are the negative effects of employee’s resistant to change? How to handle employees who doesn’t want to change? What are different steps to implement in order to solve this resistance to change? Also, I’m using our case study on Accent Systems Technology Inc. as one of the case examples. To successfully answer the above questions, I will look into the different change diagnostic models (McKinsey’s 7S Framework, Weisbord’s Six Box Organizational Model and Star Model), change theories (Kotter’s Eight-Step Model, Lewin’s Three-Step Change Theory and Lippitt’s Phases of Change Theory) and the different theories of motivation (Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg’s Two Factor Theory and McGregor’s Theory X & Theory Y and Vroom’s “Expectancy Theory). At the end, I will provide solutions and recommendations to effectively implement the change initiative project.…
In today’s world changes are relevant because of multiple factors forcing organizations to change faster than ever before. Factors both internal and external include; increased competition, globalization, technological changes, financial upheaval, political uncertainty, and changing workforce demographics. Resistance is an inevitable response to any major change. If management does not understand, accept and make an effort to work with resistance it can undermine the best intentional change efforts.…
Business is about creating an organization that will develop and implement changes that will lead to growth and success. Organizational change is not easy, but is an integral part that often allows the company and its employees to be prosperous. Dealing with change requires management to understand internal and external driving forces that create organizational change. A company needs to strategically devise a theory based plan that will allow implementation of changes based on driving forces. Management must also anticipate employee resistance to change. Therefore, leaders must employ strategies to minimize resistance to change in order to transform the organization.…
Two main groups of changes affect managers’ jobs and are significant to an organization: external forces and internal forces. With external forces, the need for change comes from various sources outside the organization: marketplace, governmental laws and regulations, technology, labor markets, and economic changes. Internal forces originate from the internal operations of the organization or from the impact of external changes. They include redefining an organization’s strategy, workforce, new equipment, and employee attitudes. Both types of changes are critical to the success of a manager and his/her organization.…