Preview

Ultimate Testimony Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
213 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ultimate Testimony Analysis
According to our text, Ultimate Testimony Issue is “expert testimony that specifically answers the legal question in a particular case. It answers the question that the trier of fact (a judge or jury) must decide” (Costanzo & Krauss, 2015). It is better known as “Federal Rule 704” and is used to set restrictions on the language that may be used by experts when giving their opinions on whether a defendant is competent enough to stand trial. Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) prevents psychiatrists and other expert witnesses in federal criminal trials from testifying as to whether a defendant did or did not have a mental state or condition comprising either an element of the crime or an element of the defense (Buchanan, 2006). The Federal Rules

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw V Thomas

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Benic v New South Wales [2010] NSWSC 1039 the risk of harm was the plaintiff, a police officer, suffering psychiatric injury as a result of receiving a threat to his life in the course of his work. The alleged breach was the failure to provide prompt and appropriate psychological or psychiatric assistance. The court noted that whether the risk was not insignificant was to be analysed from the perspective of the defendant and was to be prospective: at [411]. The evidence was that the Commissioner of Police had taken a series of steps to address stress, including psychiatric illness, amongst police officers. This evidence satisfied Garling J that the risk of psychiatric illness from the defendant’s perspective was not insignificant: at [414]. It was reasoned that the risk of psychiatric harm:…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dusky Case Summary

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    US the Supreme Court established guidelines that satisfy due process in regards to one’s competency to stand trial. The Supreme Court determined that the court must find the defendant able to rationally, and functionally understand the charges and proceedings against them, and have a present ability to assist their attorney in their defense. It is not merely enough for one to be oriented as to person, place, and time. This standard goes on to define both the cognitive and interpersonal aspects of competency to stand trial . The cognitive element is the ability to know and understand the charges and legal process being taken. The interpersonal element is in regards to the ability of the client to assist their attorney. Moreover, the Dusky standard confirms that under Higgins v. McGrath (1951), a defendant who suffers from a severe mental mental disorder may still be competent to stand trial if the defendant can understand and assist their attorney. Furthermore, because of these new guidelines, Dusky was retried and received a guilty verdict however, his sentencing was reduced by more than half. He was sentenced to 20 years with eligibility for parole in 5 years in comparison to serving the original sentence of 45…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two cases with defendants who both have plead not guilty by reason of insanity, have been given two different rulings despite the fact that they both have mental illnesses. In James Holmes’ trial, Holmes killed twelve people and injured more than seventy in his local movie theater. Holmes was found not guilty by reason of insanity, but a psychiatrist claimed him to be legally sane, but had a mental illness.(Ingold and Phillips) If Holmes was ‘legally sane’ but mentally ill then he should not have been found not guilty by reason of INSANITY. In the Eddie Routh case, he was given a life sentence and had suffered severe PTSD and schizophrenia prior to the crime. (Banner) According to the Model Penal Code would not Routh's mental illness be the cause of his crime and excuse him from the sentence? The court is acting unjust, inconsistent, and illogical in their rulings to these defendants who both have records of mental illness, or claims of mental illness, but one walks into the prison at the end of the day and the other walks into the mental ward. The rules currently in action allow judges to rule based on what seems to be their unlogical personal opinion after maybe reviewing the mental illness records, maybe not, their pigheaded personality will…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: We Are Witnesses

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the novel ‘We Are Witnesses’ a 13 year old Orthodox Jew by the name of Moshe Flinker is highlighted through his very own diary entries during the holocaust. I personally I thought it was very easy to make a connection to Moshe and his thoughts/writing. One major connection I was able to make was when Moshe stated that he was very keen on the idea of being a Jewish diplomat in a nationalist-all Jew Israel. I to am a big dreamer and very much enjoy thinking about my future and deciding what I should do with my life. Then after days of dreaming, come to a crashing, heartbreaking discovery that the dream is either unrealistic, not worth it, or not even enjoyable.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Phyllis Dorothy James or more commonly referred to as P.D James was born in Oxford in 1920. James attended Cambridge High School for Girls. Her first published work titled Cover Her Face which she began writing in the mid 50s introduced the public to her most iconic character; investigator Adam Dagliesh. Dagliesh is a well-known character who is a reoccurring presence in a series of detective novels one of which I have had the pleasure of indulging in/reading, namely The Death of an expert witness.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    False, Once a physician offered by the prosecution as an expert witness testifies to his or her qualifications, cross-examination as to those qualifications by the defense is not permitted.…

    • 6041 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Resnick, P. J. (MD). (November 5, 2011). The Andrea Yates Case: Insanity on Trial [Video podcast]. YouTube. Retrieved from http://youtube.com/watch?v=dCnUIQtYN0…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dr. Gaskell submits a written forensic psychological evaluation report addressing competency to stand trial or fitness to stand trial, which includes:…

    • 721 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Proposal

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As the defense attorney in the case of State v. Stu Dents it is hard to argue against the insurmountable evidence that the authorities collected at the home of Stu Dents following the murder of his girlfriend Uma Opee. Among the items was a journal which the defendant started to write in six months prior to the incident. With this evidence the prosecutor speculates that Mr. Dent planned and calculated this vicious act. While the journal shows substantial incriminating evidence against Mr. Dents it also illustrates the mind of a very disturbed and confused person. Entries in the journal discuss purchasing certain items that were allegedly used during the murder, however in his confused state of mind he also made references of aliens, God, and the end of the world. The court should consider this not to be an act of a premeditated murderer, but an individual who is suffering from severe mental illness. Confirmation of his…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally, the insanity plea should not be allowed is because the ability to know if a criminal is insane at the time of the crime is near impossible without creditable witnesses.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness Testimony

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Historically, eyewitnesses have played a crucial role in arrests and convictions in New York, and elsewhere. Law enforcement, judges and juries have relied heavily on the statements and identifications of witnesses because they were actually present for, or otherwise a part of, a criminal offense. Recent studies have shown, however, that eyewitness testimony may not be as reliable as it was long thought to be.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Corrections and Treatment

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    a final concern to the justice system might reflect mental health issues that are not able to be…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diagnostic Research Grp. v. Vora, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 8691 (Tex. App.--San Antonio Aug. 19, 2015, no pet. h.). An expert witness does not have to be of the same medical specialty as the defendant to testify regarding the applicable standard of care or alleged departure from that standard. Under rule 702 of the Texas Rules of Evidence, "knowledge, skill, experience, training or education" about the issue the court is addressing is all that is required. See Tex. R. Evid. 702.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays