Preview

Tyranny In The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tyranny In The United States
At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, fifty-five men attend. They are all wealthy, and they are all white. The newly-formed United States of America is in need of a stronger central government. This is because the Articles of Confederation are too weak to properly govern. Tyranny, which means cruel and oppressive government or rule, was one of the main focuses of the leaders of the new United States of America. In this essay, tyranny and guarding against it is the main focus.
The United States couldn’t keep all of its power in its central government. “In the compound government of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments…” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788) James Madison believes that there should first be two types of governments. Those are the state governments and the central governments. Without balance of power, people feared there would be tyranny, and I think that’s exactly what James Madison was saying. …show more content…
That’s why our founders decided to split the central government’s power up even more. Now, we have three houses and they all look over each other, making sure one isn’t too powerful. “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47) This is another quote by James Madison that I feel best represents why we have three different houses in our United States government. He’s saying that all the power that the United States government has in either one person’s hands or many could lead to tyranny if we’re not careful and watch over
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Checks And Balances Essay
    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Checks And Balances Essay

    Our checks and balances system is an endless circle of power. Delegates at the constitutional convention did not want any one man or group of men to have all the power over the United States of America. They were afraid that if they gave too much power to one person or a group of people the United States would end up in a dictatorship. In order to avoid such problem they divided the government into three branches: executive branch, legislative branch and judicial branch.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Analysis
    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Analysis

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny through checks and balances. Checks and Balances is where the three branches work together to make sure no one branch has too much power. Each branch receives control over the other branches. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote the federalist papers in 1787 and 1788. According to Doc. C, and Federalist paper number 51,” Constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices is in such a manner… check on the other.” James Madison, is explaining how the government got split into three branches. Next he explained that the three branches were framed/setup to check on each other…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Essay
    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Essay

    In Document A Federalism it answers the question of why did the constitution guard against tyranny they guard against to portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments They divided state/national into something that both governments wouldn’t have too much power. Central government and state are the two pieces that make up Madison's compound government. Central government has powers needed to run the nation, and state government has important local powers.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    English Bill Of Rights Vs Federalist 10 Analysis
    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    English Bill Of Rights Vs Federalist 10 Analysis

    Throughout English and Anglo- American history, the idea of checking and placing limits on political power became necessary after a history of a central government with too much control. During the 17th and 18th centuries, the English Bill of Rights and Federalist 10 were written in hopes of limiting political authority while still placing sufficient power in the hands of the government to maintain order. While both documents outlined power of the central government, they differed in terms of who’s voices mattered in politics. However, both documents focused on how a strong national legislature served as a check against tyranny.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison
    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of The Second Treatise Of Government By James Davison Hunter
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of The Second Treatise Of Government By James Davison Hunter

    The United States’ government has progressively changed since its founding. John Locke’s description of a government is not exactly how it should be as described by James Davison Hunter. Locke wrote “The Second Treatise of Government” which pointed out the role of a government and the liberties of its citizens. On the other hand, Hunter wrote “The Enduring Culture War” that noted the ongoing “war” of large institutions and government that misrepresents its own people.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Federalist Paper 10 And 51
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Federalist Paper 10 And 51

    In response to the formidable factions fear, Madison explained in Federalist Paper 10 how the proposed government would be able to control the effects of any one faction or group. He stated that the larger the government, the better to control factions as it would be more difficult to deceive all the people, and there would be more factions in a larger government and nation, effectively weakening them. In addition to the faction fear, Madison addressed the public’s concern about the strength of the presented government by depicting the checks and balances that were to be implemented. Madison justified the need of a strong, central government by illustrating the practicality of checks and balances and a representative republic…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    The government was set up under the Articles of Confederation, America’s first constitution. The founders were so afraid of a strong central government that they gave all power to the states, rather than set up an over-seeing national government. The Revolution was fought to get away from an overbearing and unfair ruler, so it is understandable why they wouldn’t want another monarchy to take over. The problem was that the Articles of Confederation gave little to no power at all to their national government, causing distress and non-compliance between the states. The Articles of Confederation denied the government the ability to take care of the states and the union. An influential philosopher at the time, Hobbes, believes that it is the sole purpose of the national government to enforce peace and laws; thus making life, liberty, and the pursuit of property possible. Another influential philosopher at the time, Locke, also believes that a central government is necessary to promote public good, to protect property and promote…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Confederation Dbq
    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Confederation Dbq

    They didn’t want it to be that same type of centralized government, although they did want it to be a type of centralized government; specifically a federalized one. The difference between a centralized government and a federalized government is that a federalized one is more of a democracy. It is many different societies and smaller powers all operated and governed under one big power. America is the first ever example of that, with each state being operated under the central government. A centralized government is one with just a huge government that has all the power over one country. Our government is that as well, but this is a broad term. Dictatorships or monarchies are examples of other centralized but not federalized governments that have not worked very well. The U.S is both, and it works great under the…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist paper number 51
    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist paper number 51

    A separation of powers helps prevent anyone gaining too much power however Madison argues power must not be divided equally. In a republican form of government the legislative branch is the most powerful, and therefore must be divided into two different branches. These two branches, the House of Representatives and the Senate, must remain separate and have different principles of action. While protecting against the oppression of rulers is important it is also important to guard against the injustice of groups or citizens. Madison acknowledges that…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Meep Meep
    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Meep Meep

    Chapter 9 The Confederation and the Constitution AP US History 1.|Abigail Adams| 2.|Daniel Shays| 3.|Alexander Hamilton| 4.|James Madison| 5.|Gouverneur Morris| 6.|Thomas Jefferson| 7.|primogeniture| 8.|federation| 9.|checks and balances| 10.|sovereignty| 11.|“mobocracy”| 12.|consent of the governed| 13.|republicanism| 14.|states' rights|…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Anti Federalists
    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On Anti Federalists

    As stated in Federalist paper #39 says "It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it.” Their intentions were to keep the government from getting way too powerful and unbalanced. If we separate the government into different branches the government would have checks and balances to…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    inspiring
    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    inspiring

    The deceitful ways of the government, prompted congress to recommend that each colony should form a new government by the “authority of the people.” The restrictions would prevent free suffrage and initiate inequality for the people. I shall argue that equality didn’t exist among all Americans but for those who were free from slavery,who owned property and property being the basis of freedom.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics